1. Is there a new department at the Ottawa Police already dedicated to social media
2. Who's in charge.
3. Who dispatched the orders at the Niagara station.
4. No violent crime uninvestigated or requires attention? All solved?
5.who dispatched the orders at the Ottawa Police station
6. What were the precise instructions
7. What section of the Canadian criminal code are they investigating under
8. What section of any other legislation or code are they investigating under
9. What precise communications have been complained
10. Who are the complainants
11. Do they receive any renumeration for their complaints
12. Is the complainants subjective feeling an issue in the investiation
13. How many trainees or employees are devoted to this in a- the Niagara Police department b - Ottawa Police department c- law society
14. Is staffing in other Police departments now devoted , focusing , or getting trained on Social media posts
15. Are bail laws keeping Canadian offenders out of prison clearing space for social media criminals.
16. Does thevtraining presume the passage of certain bills, if so which ones.
17. Or will they be enforcing the speech 'crimes' of all the professional bodies and regulatory regimes and antibullying policies, and work place harassment laws.
I think I will assume answering any of their questions is dangerous. But putting a cold list of questions for them and having them readily available is not legal advice but not a bad idea. Criminal defence lawyers are about to meet the deep globalist state in my humble opinion.
If police come to your door get name and badges and ask what the charges are. Do not even open the door to them. Then send them back to where they came from. Don't provide them with any info they can and will twist to use against you
Run-away-authorities. They have no constitutional, legal or regulatory basis to “visit”. They are compelled off-the-record” by communications between WEF, Trudeau and local minions to demonstrate how coup plays out before Trudeau is kick out of government and sent flying in orbit with other junk (space junk). A reprehensible, vile excuse for ameboid waste material. Pathetic.
Holy Frack. I thought the lawyer in the video defended herself very well. But why did she let these two gov't lackeys into her house in the first place? Better to have filmed them standing on the porch. And their faces.
My stance is, gov't will push until it gets pushback. Free speech is a right, not a privilege. The minute you accept that free speech is not your right, it's not. And then, by the by, those in power who find what you have to say in any way inconvenient will quash your privilege because they can.
I'm involved in a LAWFARE matter and will be back in court again on Oct 28th.
.
The Full Disclosure provided after a 6-month wait, indicates that I am INNOCENT, so I'll be representing myself.
.
My plan is to devote about 10% of my time defending myself and the rest to KICKING BUTT.
.
IRRELEVANT SIDE NOTE ... I once faced a charge in a Montreal Municipal Court. I was represented by Morris Fish who years later was appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada. I understand the WEIGHT that a good Lawyer carries, but I'm sure there will be no need for one. The big challenge will be figuring out how to Introduce Evidence, but I can manage that.
Anyone remember the 'wolf sounds' the Army was playing over speakers hidden in in the woods to frighten people into believing that wolves were descending on the province?
1. Is there a new department at the Ottawa Police already dedicated to social media
2. Who's in charge.
3. Who dispatched the orders at the Niagara station.
4. No violent crime uninvestigated or requires attention? All solved?
5.who dispatched the orders at the Ottawa Police station
6. What were the precise instructions
7. What section of the Canadian criminal code are they investigating under
8. What section of any other legislation or code are they investigating under
9. What precise communications have been complained
10. Who are the complainants
11. Do they receive any renumeration for their complaints
12. Is the complainants subjective feeling an issue in the investiation
13. How many trainees or employees are devoted to this in a- the Niagara Police department b - Ottawa Police department c- law society
14. Is staffing in other Police departments now devoted , focusing , or getting trained on Social media posts
15. Are bail laws keeping Canadian offenders out of prison clearing space for social media criminals.
16. Does thevtraining presume the passage of certain bills, if so which ones.
17. Or will they be enforcing the speech 'crimes' of all the professional bodies and regulatory regimes and antibullying policies, and work place harassment laws.
I think I will assume answering any of their questions is dangerous. But putting a cold list of questions for them and having them readily available is not legal advice but not a bad idea. Criminal defence lawyers are about to meet the deep globalist state in my humble opinion.
If police come to your door get name and badges and ask what the charges are. Do not even open the door to them. Then send them back to where they came from. Don't provide them with any info they can and will twist to use against you
That is 🤪 crazy. A society of extreme correctness according to the government.
Run-away-authorities. They have no constitutional, legal or regulatory basis to “visit”. They are compelled off-the-record” by communications between WEF, Trudeau and local minions to demonstrate how coup plays out before Trudeau is kick out of government and sent flying in orbit with other junk (space junk). A reprehensible, vile excuse for ameboid waste material. Pathetic.
Why are their faces blurred? We need to know who these low-life thugs are.
Holy Frack. I thought the lawyer in the video defended herself very well. But why did she let these two gov't lackeys into her house in the first place? Better to have filmed them standing on the porch. And their faces.
My stance is, gov't will push until it gets pushback. Free speech is a right, not a privilege. The minute you accept that free speech is not your right, it's not. And then, by the by, those in power who find what you have to say in any way inconvenient will quash your privilege because they can.
What stage are we in, 2 ?
At what stage do they open the camps, 3 ?
Which would could only mean the trains will arrive in stage 4.
I'm involved in a LAWFARE matter and will be back in court again on Oct 28th.
.
The Full Disclosure provided after a 6-month wait, indicates that I am INNOCENT, so I'll be representing myself.
.
My plan is to devote about 10% of my time defending myself and the rest to KICKING BUTT.
.
IRRELEVANT SIDE NOTE ... I once faced a charge in a Montreal Municipal Court. I was represented by Morris Fish who years later was appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada. I understand the WEIGHT that a good Lawyer carries, but I'm sure there will be no need for one. The big challenge will be figuring out how to Introduce Evidence, but I can manage that.
.
I'm a huge believer in REVENGE.
.
Anyone remember the 'wolf sounds' the Army was playing over speakers hidden in in the woods to frighten people into believing that wolves were descending on the province?