19 Comments

The demonic agenda is well on its track. The fallen angels always wanted to mess up with our reproduction and our clear sexual identification at birth, and this, since the creation of man. They are obsessed with our God-given DNA. And fiercely jealous of humans. That explains it all. Ok, really spooky comment... the solution?: Let's go back to God's will and rest in his presence.

Expand full comment

....(N)ot on our laurels. And Satan's evil minions are not only extremely jealous of human beings, the apple of God's eye, but exceedingly hateful against all of us, thus the present neo-holocaust.

Expand full comment

Absolutely! their attacks are getting pretty vicious. Going after the children with determination. God protect them!

Expand full comment

Any humanists here? Or just more complicated labels that do not really fit?

Expand full comment

The irony is at the 30 minute mark

Expand full comment

I imagine these new feminists (male or female today) in front of St. Peter at the pearly gates:

"I'm a androgyne AMAB cishet feminine-presenting as xe/xem/xyrs graygender maverique third gender stone butch".

St. Peter:

"Elevator to hell is to the left."

Expand full comment

Why would I be blocked from "Liking" your comment, but not from doing so on other's comments? I don't recall us having a disagreement. Do you just not like my beliefs and my expression of them? Whaz up with that? [I didn't even know we could block individual commenters (or do you have me blocked completely for some reason{s})?]

Oh, I think I know what's going on, you reported one or more of my comments (do you truly understand freedom of speech at all, and that it includes "offensive"/"inflamatory" speech?), and blocked me then(?). (SEE Brandenburg vs. Ohio.)

"Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".[2][3]: 702  Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927)[4] was explicitly overruled, and Schenck v. United States (1919),[5] Abrams v. United States (1919),[6] Gitlow v. New York (1925),[7] and Dennis v. United States (1951)[8] were overturned." Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

And this applies not just to the government. It is every True American's DUTY to obey the Constitution without fail, second only to the first law book, the Word(s) of God, the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments, because the Constitution is the Supreme Law(s) of the Land. [And the Bible is the Supreme Law(s) of God.] NO ONE has ANY right(s) WHATSOEVER to not be offended, since free speech includes "offensive", or as it was put above, "inflamatory", speech. Even including threatening speech as long as such threats are not likely to actually be imminently carried out. So, again, no one has a right to not be offended and/or inflamed. And, since the opposite actual right(s) are in-, or un-, alienable, meaning they cannot be taken away from and/or withheld from us AT ALL WHATSOEVER, UNDER ANY CONSTITUTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, and thus also meaning that we have it/them EVERYWHERE, and therefore also meaning that EVERYONE (every True American) has the duty to not violate that, and/or to not violate ANYONE'S right to speak "offensive" and/or "inflamatory" speech, and even non-actually-imminent-action(s) of PHYSICAL violence speech, FREELY. ....PERIOD. EVERYONE. EVERYWHERE. AT ALL TIMES. WITH NO EXCEPTION(S), EXCEPT SUCH THINGS AS CRYING FIRE IN A CROWDED THEATER WHEN THERE IS NO FIRE, AND/OR NOT BEING A DIRECT PARTY TO A LEGAL ACTION IN A COURT OF LAW AND DISRUPTING THE PROCEEDINGS UNJUSTIFIABLY. THAT'S IT, NO OTHER EXCEPTION(S) WHATSOEVER. [Remember, I said "such things as", so I'm not saying that there aren't other examples, like disrupting the operation(s) of government agencies, unless it is a legitimate protest that is also "protected(-by-law)" free speech under the First Amendment.]

Expand full comment

Nsomi Wolf is very popular now that she is seen as a human rights activist rather than as a feminist. To many men and intelligent non-feminist women, feminism is inherently of the left. Specifically, it's seen as the second heresy of Marxism. Nazism, with which feminism has much in common, is seen as the first heresy. Nazism replaces the working class with "Aryan" and the ruling class with "Jew." Feminism replaces "Aryan" with female and "Jew" with male. Most men don't see it as a movement for equality. They see it as female supremacist, gynocentric, "femi-narcissistic" and misandristic. When men think of male supporters of feminism, they think of Jusin Trudeau. One can suppoort women's rights without being a feminist. Many men have daughters. We don't consider them as lesser than men. We see men and women as different but of equal value. Unfortunately, there are worse threats to women that have been spawned by feminists than transwomen. The MGTOWs, the male version of lesbian separatists, but hetero, want women extermjnated off the face of the earth. They don't want women oppressed or subjugated. They want them gone, exterminated off the face of the planet. .They believe that inceasingly realistic robot females and womb machines will take over. Men will marry these robots.

.Japan Releases Fully Functioning Female Robots

https://youtu.be/PLBAbmETEmo?si=3xPHvIg87roQWRGe

Expand full comment

you are bang on that women are up next when the wombs are ready. The last patents were filled so long ago. I think the silence means they could be ready and are now proceeding on the IP equivalent of trade secret. I have posted this along time ago. My own view is that marriage is massively protective of women and children. My post on terminator seeds deals with this.

You should watch her video. She concurs with your assessment

Expand full comment

The problem for me with watching it Lisa is that whenever I hear the words "feminism" or "feminist" repeatedly I feel nauseous and I think with my amygdala. I act reflexively. Whenever I hear those words I release the safety catch on my Browning. But I'll try. Thanks for all your excellent substacks.

Expand full comment

The truth is, modern feminism - not Susan B. Anthony type - was the product of Marxists. Such as Friedan, Firestone, Steinem, ad nauseam. Marxists, victimhood types, and biggest H8TERS on the planet. And the truth is, as the Fraser Inst. pointed out years, around 1990, ago, never married women made as much even in the preceeding decades as never married men. The equation changed when women got married, and many CHOSE to stay home to raise healthy, well adjusted kids rather than put "I created Windows 98" or "I created the Edsel" or "See the piece of junk from StuffMart there in the garbage? I created that." The marketplace militates against discrimination by its very nature... assuming it can operate freely.

"A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle" trope from the later married Steinem should actually be a "feminazi without a brain is like... well.... like their leader, Joe Biden."

Radical feminism started the cultural descent we see today, and are the original locus of evil.

And yes, I am married to a wonderful university educated, brilliant woman... who also despises radical feminism.

Expand full comment

////

Dear Lisa (and I mean that in nothing but the most literal, sincere fashion),

During all those many years of college, didn't you have to take English classes, particularly composition (like English 1A in the U.S.---I confess I never took it, because I dropped out of college, thank God, only two grad requirement courses away from graduating with a B.A. in Art)? By the grace of God I recognized early on, even before I knew who God was (although I was starting to move in His and Jesus the Christ's direction since I was trying to figure out why this insane world operated the way it does, and why there is so much hate, violence, war and mass-murder), when I was too young and an idiot (I'm still a sinful idiot, by the way), that getting a college degree was against Right, was wrong, was incorrect, and that it leads to egotism, self-righteousness, and self-"superiority". I didn't want to sell out to the almighty dollar and become a "yuppie" or, as I call it, a "fitter-inner". I have NEVER regretted dropping out of college. Thank God that I couldn't fit it to all or most of Satan's counterfeits of God's Way and Will. Thank God I didn't become a conformist, or become one of the mostly "fitter-inners", and especially come to believe that being such is "right", becoming more and more sold out to the love of money and Satan's will. No one can get away with "kicking and screaming" against God.

On feminism, it was created by Satan and "al CIAduh(!)" [it appears Naomi Wolf and the like will never come to recognize that (even though she now claims to be a Jewish Christian and to believe that Jesus is the Messiah), will continue to remain sold out to this evil world, and to Satan's will and way, contrary to God's Way and Will, and will continue in her/their self-righteousness, self-"superiority" and ego-tripping]. Feminism is one of Satan's many counterfeits of God's Will and Way, to get women to go the opposite direction from God's will for women, and for men. [With "trans-gression" and acceptance of the extreme evil(s) of homosexuality, and soon acceptance of pedophelia, leading people to accept the evils of perversion and the opposite of God's Will, and leading far too many people to falsely believe wholeheartedly that God's Way and Will is "wrong"]. God isn't going to tolerate this increasingly bizarre situation much longer, praise Him! Relatively soon He will return and do away with all of this insanity and madness, and with all of the evil and suffering, and bring about nothing but True Justice and True Peace. Anyone really believe that anyone, or any group, like "trans-gressive" people and homosexuals, are truly happy, even though they are so sure, to the point of increasingly-violent militancy, that they are right and doing the "right" thing(s), in going against God [or falsely believe they're "Christian(s)" and that their lifestyle is "okay" with God]? Of course they aren't happy! They are ONLY phonily, and/or "countefeitly", "happy".

Getting back to English skill(s), I didn't pay attention in English classes in junior high school (I sat in the back, ignored the teachers, and drew pictures of Frodo and the Starship Enterprise---and I believe I was/am somewhat "on the spectrum" from vaccine injury when I was about five years of age), and I cut most classes in high school, except shop classes most of the time (I got all A's and one B in them---I should have been in a polytechnic high school). I think it was only because of those high grades in shop classes, that my high school graduated me at all in 1973 [and they were doing away with "low and high" semesters, so they graduated me and my whole class an entire semester early (thus I graduated when I was 17, not due to any "brains").] :o) So, my English grammar skills were abysmal, and virtually non-existent. But about twenty-five years ago, with the advent of computers (late for me in '98---oh, I used them in jobs, but I didn't own my first one until then), I began teaching myself to write better, little by little over the years since, with less and less extremely-long run-on sentences and paragraphs, and bad grammar, and discontinuing not knowing how to use punctuation correctly, etc. (I don't give ANY credence to what I call "the texting mentality" today, and I don't accept it, and accept that communication is degenerating into over-simplification and simpleminded "code", such that most people don't understand intelligent writing and conversation, and increasingly feel threatened by it and intelligent people, much more than they always did/were.) But, starting after high school, I read a lot of mostly fiction (I love science sci-fi), which increasingly taught me how to write a little bit better over time, and to overcome bad writing habits. (But I'm aware that I'm still a lousy writer.)

One can read, to this day, my original website ( www.form-legal.com ), "Wolf Britain's Human Rights Webpages", and see how poorly I "wrote" (I was also idiotically a "liberal", or thought I was---so, if you read any of it, please don't hold it against me or let it turn you off to me too much---I'm now nothing but an independent constitutionalist, and neither "liberal", "conservative" nor "centrist"). To this day I embrace what both sides of the aisle have correct, and discard ALL of the rest. As I already alluded to, I don't go along with ANY of the degradation of language, people's refusal to take language seriously, and any of their butchering of it, since it leads to simplemindedness and/or willfull stupidity and ignorance. In order to truly, fully, completely and correctly understand what we need to stand up against, and how to do so nothing but properly, as well as fully convey its necessity correctly, we must take our use of language seriously, and not let ourselves, at all, contribute, or continue to contribute, to the degradation of language, and our accepting not conveying it in as much of a fully-correct fashion as we possibly can, being as clear and concise as we can be, without being nonsensicle and/or "too difficult to decipher"; as, forgive me, you Lisa, and far too many others, are in your and/or their writing(s). It makes all of you sound "schizophrenic", or like your "elevator doesn't go all the way to the top", or like you're "not operating with a full deck".

My point is, I know, since you have told me, that you believe you've just got to get the truth out to people without "wasting" any, or enough, time editing and correcting the grammatics of your articles and rants, yet that is nothing but an unacceptable "excuse". Thus, I recommend that you teach yourself to be a better writer, to not rant so excessively so much, and I encourage you to take the time to edit and correct the errors, poor grammatics, and abysmal punctuation in your writing(s), and at least make them somewhat better and easier to understand without your readers having to entertain mental gymnastics in order to understand correctly what you are saying. I find much of what you have to contribute exceedingly beneficial, but your lack of writing skill(s) turns many people away from being fully benefited and edified by your writing(s), especially as you intend(ed). "All I know" is, you and your writing(s), and your "reach", would be much better served if you didn't sound like you are other than the intelligent person you are, like you're "bipolar manic depressive", "schizophrenic" (as I already said), and/or suffering from some other mental imbalance. I'm sure you don't want to sound that way, and that you do want to write better, so I hope you will take what I'm saying to heart, and will educate yourself to write better.

Otherwise, I don't say any of this with an axe to grind. Nor do I feel at all "superior", and/or "better than", you or anyone else, or like my teaching myself to write better in any way(s) makes me any of those things, even partially. As I've made clear over and over again in previous Substack and other threads, I feel similar to the Apostle Paul, like I'm the worst of all sinners (though I'm not), because that is, according to God and His Word(s), the kind of humility and/or self-deprecation that we're all supposed to have, and I don't feel that the gain of better writing skill(s) does anything but make us more accurately able to convey what God wants us to convey. I cannot fail to recognize that you have great potential (I don't AT ALL mean that condescendingly or patronizingly), and that you are highly intelligent, but please don't let your poor writing skill(s) continue to overshadow that and drive readers away. Your "gain of (increasingly better) function", so to speak, will only make your writings more attractive, draw a greater audience, and benefit more people. So, I hope and pray you will not feel at all defensive or offended by my trying to help you become the better person that God only wants you to be, in a completely "humbled-in-the-dust" sort of way [a "(t)ake the shoes from off your feet, for the ground upon which you stand is holy ground" kind of humility], which is something I also aspire to.

Yours for ONLY True Peace through the Prince of Peace, Jesus the Christ, and wishing you and yours nothing but the very best, without any exception(s), signed,

Wolf

S. Wolf Britain [simply, and only, a lamb in wolves' clothing, NOT a wolf in sheep's clothing] :o) [Oh, and also known as "Steppen-Wolf(gang) Amadeus Cerveza Allemagne Britain, non-esquire] ['These are the voyages of the Starship Steppen-Wolf, on a lifelong mission to explore and obtain nothing but Godliness, and boldly go where few people have gone before! ("And absolutely NOT, WHATSOEVER, EVER go quietly into this evil night!")' Cheers!]

////

Expand full comment

It is my very poor eyes.

Expand full comment

Seriously?! If so, I have nothing but compassion for that. And then, by all means, keep up the good work, and take my suggestions with a grain of salt. Only TRUE Peace! Much True Love!

Expand full comment

I am using Grammarly for my book for the reasons you outline. I hope you like the book. but yes my sight is worse all the time.

Expand full comment

I hope it's not the nanotech affecting your eyes! Are you trying the natural treatment protocols like McCullough's and the EDTA chelation and/or supplementation, as I am? My vision is going downhill too, but I'm doing those protocols, and taking Lutein, etc. I pray that we don't go blind! Please, Dearest Lord God, in Jesus the Christ's name protect our eyes and our vision, and don't let us go blind! Thank you ahead of time, Lord! God bless, keep and protect you, Lisa!

Expand full comment

P.S.---Do you have someone to proofread and edit your book for you? If you want to send me the a copy of the manuscript, or copies of parts of it at a time, I would be more than willing to edit them and correct grammatical errors without changing your intended meaning at all, and/or without removing anything without your permission, and I wouldn't even expect any recognition for it whatsoever.

Expand full comment

P.P.S.---Wow, what a beautiful day it is outside! Too bad I rarely go out much anymore. I'm thinking about going for a bike ride for the first time in over a month. [Do you ever feel like I do that you have "brain hiccups" when you use the wrong word(s), without realizing you're doing it, and not catching it right away, and/or where you "blankout" and just don't write what you meant to write overall in the first place? Even without the weed I smoke {the benefits outweigh the downside(s)}, I completely lose my train of thought and have extreme trouble thinking of the right words, a symptom for years. Like the great Isaac Asimov wrote, the memories are all "in there" (in the brain supercomputer), bringing them back to one's recollection is the problem, aka it's a problem of recall, not the memory(ies) it/themself(ves). Anyway, it's also a symptom of my CFIDS, Lyme Disease, Fibromyalgia, and now I realize Morgellons (the nanotech infestation) as well, or "over all".]

PPPS---Don't worry, if you granted me the privilege of helping you edit your book, I wouldn't "correct" or write with legalese like I commonly do otherwise (since I too have a legal background).

My full signature block to letters:

Totally Physically Disabled In Pro Per, Pro Esse Suo, Sui Juris Equal, Human, Civil, Legal, Disability, Tenant, and Liberty Rights Advocate; Independent Paralegal and/or Whistleblower; P.C. (Personal Computer) Specialist; Blogger / Blogmaster; Webmaster; Writer; Poet; and member of the National Lawyers Guild (Bar Association) [NLG (as a totally physically disabled, retired former legal worker)], The Rutherford Institute (J.D. John W. Whitehead's longtime, libertarian, "ACLU-like" organization) [TRI], and the American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU]

Expand full comment