Is it one flag or not?

Kathleen Scott presents her views, apparently quite hated by the 'left'

1. It's been a long time since I knew anything about what Feminists were doing, in academia or otherwise;

2. I had heard that Feminism is the precursor to the Trans movement;

3. I am not sure that I buy that. Actually I don’t buy that. Maybe the idea that we are the words we say- and that apparently wotdsmithing comes from Feminism, or at least they got excellent at policing words- maybe that get’s you part way. Because that's how you get to pronouns. Well recently I’ve been putting mankind or congressmen, back in my vocabulary simply as a rebellion on the curation of words. Like we will survive that microagression, but not survive social or economic apartheid (or even jail) that comes with deplatforming etc for wrong-speak.

4. I prefer the idea that our words can describe our perceived reality. Not the reverse. I don’t think you can make up any crap and have that amount to truth. Though- I do believe that all great ideas start with the mind coupling to our will power. I do not fly because I just wrote: I can soar. But I can say I am writing a book and do it.

5. I preserve for myself to right observe my world and come to my own conclusions, despite MSM or other any other control matrix dictating a preferred narrative they expect me to adopt. I prefer to be able to think for myself and rely upon my 5 senses;

6. I am not the ideal feminist, despite really wanting to improve women’s rights and especially as it pertains to sexual assault. I like science and math and studied both prior to Law. I like answers. My words want to describe what I see and think. I do not divorce myself from my opinions, or analysis because contrary views are expounded.;

7. There’s dysphorphia- but that is not the size of the movement we see. Saying they need compassion is like the cover all. But really who doesn’t need compassion in this world as of late? No description necessary. You know what we are facing;

8. Where do the converts to gender disphoria come from? A conflict of interest analysis that just establishes where you build a system for one result you get that result; (ie teach it in schools, online,);

9. The elephant in the room for me that no one discusses is whether an aggressor culture is responsible for the introduction of this in our schools, for the precise purpose of weakening social fabrics. Many believe this is LGB. More likely this is appropriation of LGB by CCP infiltration.

10. This is a war of sorts, where our children are the bombs that are going off. Some parents may be fine, whereas for others it is so fundamentally destabilizing that the family itself is neutralized from protecting the culture.

11. Or that it serves the DE-population agenda- all sterilization does;

12. Or that it serves as a weapon of Culture War and Identity politics, the way Mao pivoted identity politics into civil war- pray it does not;

13. Or that there is a billion dollar industry that requires the victims like any other drug trade (from Opiods to vaccines, from cocaine to crack. Schools are the new inner-cities of Lupron);

14. Or that there is a race component, that comes from anti-black requiring white sin to be without repentance, but knocking off your balls and breasts, front walks you to top victim and status again- trading in status with genitalia;

15. Or that there is a vengeance on Faith communities;

16. Or that the there is a war on the family unit as the unit that perpetuates capitalism.

17. the reason that women need to be eliminated in terms of vocabulary and the possibility of sexual preferences IS BECAUSE THE ARTIFICIAL womb is next up;

18. Trans-genders then as the non-woman men, or the men who are not -women, but now culturally need to be since women will be competition for the widget that is the artificial womb-

19. where society has an artificial womb would you breed women out;

20. The violence and hatred you see from trans towards who they want to occupy culturally, is odd to me. I first presumed that if you want to be a woman, it was because you love event about women. I actually thought trans women would love women so much- but then the hate I saw made me feel that the movement was appropriated by their own antifa;

21. But there is some violent anti-woman sentiment, not caring that predators will game the system for instance, to gain access to women in their safe spaces. We go from the Me too movement, to serve yourself up;

22. Several kinds of predators game the system: the peeping toms like the spaces for that purpose - to watch naked women or girls for sexual gratification;

23. the flashers game the system to access women just to flash and show their dicks to girls or women for their sexual gratification;

24. pedophiles;

25. rapists;

26. Women must ‘affirm’ men and the result is the concept that women pay with their own suffering- actual suffering is expected of women. Actual harm is expected- up to an including rape;

27. On the one hand no misgendering, is permitted. But rapes of vulnerable women in UK Hospitals or prisons, by men insisting they are women, is permissible.

28. That is one hell of a tradeoff for others to be ‘safe’.

29. See how safe is defined to include uttering words in perfection to an ever changing standard, while simultaneously being expected to actually be victimized by predators. It is a culture of female servitude- no wonder women with critical minds from all spectrums are starting to realize this;

30. It is an odd requirement for women to need to support the trans women with up to and including their own rape. We see gender identity champions, and DEI champions ignoring these real harms in fact and on purpose;

31. because it is destabilizing to society;

32. it is a rape culture that is being endorsed if women cannot have their safe spaces.

33. it is a from of gender- identity colonialization: of all our institutions. We are witnessing a repetition of colonialism (that is supposed to be bad,) but now DEI mandates this new colonialism;

34. the Trans rights and medical rights infrastructure will be appropriated by the transhumanist phase (chipping humans etc). This needs more study;

35. The movementdoesn't speak for all gays, clearly. But it has been appropriated for the results:

1. sterilization;

2. check on population growth;

3. distraction from normal capitalist pursuits;

4. predators;

5. pedophiles

30. If women can be replaced by the ARTIFICIAL WOMB and are competition for the widget and the trans-nationalists have cornered widget, then all of this cultural bubbling of hate on women, and desire to replace them in language and through approximations, makes sense;

31. It also makes sense to encourage gay men since that is all that would be left in a post-artificial-womb world.

Dr. Scott spends the first part of the video detailing how feminism did lead to the trans movement. She is a feminist who is standing up against the trans occupation of women safe spaces. There is a fair ownership and assessment.

What I didn’t expect in watching this video was for the analysis of she detailed at the 30 minute mark. Might have been a conservative expounding their views. This wave feminism sounded like Christian or other faith groups.

a. anti-abortion;

b. critical of equality narratives

b. pro-marriage and child nurturing;

c. anti-porn;

d. anti-prostitution;

e. anti-surrogating;

f. critical of sexual revolution, the pill (commitment free and promiscuous) not good for women;

g. trans is a costume;

It is like she describes a Feminism that comes full circle back to… the family unit, and the gender roles, and before the sexual revolution. She could have been Matt Walsh talking. Her lecture came full circle.

You watch and tell me what you think. when she describes a feminism on the right and left that rejects the trans movement.

If she incorporated an artificial womb and the aspect of the transhumanism that is about to be forced upon us, she might open the door a bit wider. Why do kids identify - she had no answer- she needs to view the system that is created (Glsen.org, Wpath.org Rainbowhealth planned parenthood, etc etc) It is a push because it is desired. Poor children. exploited by the idea that their disfigurement is love. I hope they find better love than that.

Again the idea that the LGB is a movement under the flag seems to be dispelled by her. No wonder she is very hated. Dr. Scott has a clear dialog of rejection of the trans movement, while being a lesbian. She dispels that there is a flag that can speak for one group. I encourage you to watch her analysis.

Are we making a wider world for the kinds of censored speech yet- while censorship arm is turning into a battering ram- where are you seeing improvements, for me it is in new communities joining. It is in greater unity.