14 Comments
Apr 29, 2023Liked by LawyerLisa

Having done a 700 page scientific paper on the scam of AGW, I am well aware of Seth Boring-stein. Or is that Seth DeepStateStein? This guy is an intellectual lightweight and an utter embarrassment to climatologists everywhere. To wit:

Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

“Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data...That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a certain corruption within the climate science community.” Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric science, MIT

Claude Allegre, a “founding father of AGW theory,” has now come out against this, stating “The cause of this climate change is unknown.”

“What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that carbon dioxide from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. “It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that carbon dioxide, the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.”— Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science, MIT. Source https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8855233-238421.pdf

Lindzen also wrote “The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.”

Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback – and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years.

Dr. William Happer, professor emeritus of physics at Princeton University, ”There isn’t a climate crisis. There will not be a climate crisis. It is utter nonsense.” https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8855233-238421.pdf

Piers Corbin, astrophysicist, founder of Weather Action, 2002 said that current weather patterns have nothing to do with man-made climate change. Instead, Corbin flatly states that those pushing this narrative are just trying to make money. “Climate has always been changing,” and “this has nothing to do with man.” Weather this year is “caused by circulation patterns… and CO2 does not cause circulation patterns. What causes those is a combination of solar activity and the phases of the moon” ; the only connection with man is that he is “here at the same time the sun and the moon are doing things. A very similar situation happened about 132 years ago where there was the same sun, magnetic, lunar states (and) there was a heat wave in Russia and floods in Pakistan as now. These things are dictated by solar activity and the moon and nothing to do with mankind. Those who say that are just trying to make money… I assure you, this has nothing to do with carbon dioxide” In his words, see here, 2:27 min.

“The climate scare (is) the biggest deception in history…”Dr. Tim Ball, environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Manitoba

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.

“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review. (Note: there really IS a Flat Earth Society, at http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/cms/, whose president Daniel Shenton, thinks “the evidence suggests fossil fuel usage is contributing to global warming.” (See www.tinyurl.com/ozn2wfe. So much for Obama’s comment that “We don’t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society.”

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.

The recent World Climate Declaration signed by around 250 university professors, and led by a Nobel physics laureate, noted that models had many shortcomings, “and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools” This declaration notes that natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming, warming is far slower than predicted, climate policy relies on inadequate models, CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth, global warming has not increased natural disasters, and that climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities. Here are all the PhD signatories.

“The present era is one of the coolest and least carbon-intensive periods of the last 600 million years. Indeed, the geological and paleontological evidence overwhelmingly says that today’s average global temperature of about 15 degrees C and CO2 concentrations of 420 ppm are nothing to fret about, and even if they rise to about 17-18 degrees C and 500-600 ppms by the end of the century, it may well on balance improve the lot of mankind. After all, bursts of civilization during the last 10,000 years uniformly occurred during the red portion of the graph below–the river civilizations, the Minoan, the Greco-Roman era, the Medieval flowering and the industrial and technological revolutions of the present era. At the same time, the several lapses into dark ages happened when the climate turned colder (blue area). And that’s only logical. When its warmer and wetter, growing seasons are longer and crop yields are better—regardless of the agricultural technology and practices of the moment. And it’s better for human and community health, too—most of the deadly plagues of history have occurred under colder climes, such as the Black Death of 1344-1350 … (the warmers narrative) ignores the entirety of the planet’s pre-Holocene (last 10,000 years) history, even though the science shows that more than 50% of the time in the last 600 million years global temperatures were in the range of 25 degrees C or 67% higher than current levels and far beyond anything projected by the most unhinged climate models today. But, crucially, at those temperature peaks planetary climate systems did not go into a doomsday loop of scorching meltdown—warming was always checked and reversed by powerful counter-veiling forces.” David Stockman, former Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reaga

Expand full comment
Apr 29, 2023Liked by LawyerLisa

Amazing - opened my eyes just a little wider. Thanks.

Expand full comment

You did a LOT of research here! Thank you. One would expect "the science" to analyze these massive detonations (and fallout: particulate matter) as a possible contributor to climate change. I don't think the IPCC has done so though. Surprise.

Expand full comment
Apr 29, 2023Liked by LawyerLisa

The truth is, there has been global warming recently – but it started around the time of the Revolutionary war, and today we are still BELOW the average of the past 3,000 years. And this is not just for Europe, Greenland and North America, yet another red herring that has recently been thrown out by the desperate global warmers. The universality of the Viking and Mediaeval climatic optimums is written about by Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment, shows we are, today, below the three thousand year average, and far below the Medieval Climatic Optimum, albeit far above the LIA. Civil Defense Perspectives, Mar. 2007, Vol. 23, #3, p. 1, notes that evidence for this climatic optimum has been found in all but 2 out of 103 locations where it was examined for, including Asia, Africa, South America and the western U.S. The following graph of temperature in the Sargasso Sea tells you all you need to know (note: that big horizontal line running across the page if you look it up is the 3,000 year average!), Interestingly, the warmer times coincided not only with the best harvests, but also the least amount of major storm activity

Or let’s put it another way, from the Dansgaard & Johnson study, ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Average-near-surface-temperatures-of-the-northern-hemisphere-during-the-past-11000-years_fig5_313127868

Want to go further back? (Note: “BP” means before present day in 2022). In sum, the last time carbon dioxide levels were this low the earth experienced its Permian die-off where 95% of all species disappeared; global temperatures are in reality equal to two earlier historic low points in from the Ordovician and the Carboniferous / Permian transition; and water vapor is a more effective greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, with the greatest driver behind earth’s global warming is – the Sun.

In case you would like corroboration of Kegwin’s study, Dr. Roy Spencer has a similar chart found at www.drroyspencer.com – see below - charting temperatures for the past two thousand years. Further, in a 2010 Russian study by Dergachev and Raspopov, they clearly found that not only are tree ring studies not very conclusive when compared to ice core data, but that solar cycles are telling, with the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change summarizing the work by stating “a detailed 750-year temperature reconstruction from an ice core in Siberia agrees well with measures of solar modulation based on sunspot number and carbon-14 and Be-10 estimates, and that the agreement is remarkable at multi-decadal time scales, ” and concluding that “Dergachev and Raspopov compare the solar indices of the past millennium with the borehole temperature reconstructions, demonstrating that the borehole data and solar indices agree on the long-term temperature pattern of the past thousand years. That is to say, the two parameters imply the existence of a solar-induced Medieval Warm Period (MWP) around AD 1000 to 1300 and a Little Ice Age (LIA) in the 1600s to 1700s. Thus, their study pretty much proves the existence of a global MWP, while demonstrating the link between the MWP-LIA oscillation and solar activity (see also http://tinyurl.com/227zg4 ) And it indicates that the MWP was roughly as warm as -- or possibly even warmer than -- it has been to date during the Current Warm Period.”

Expand full comment
Apr 30, 2023Liked by LawyerLisa

This whole Covid episode has changed my outlook on almost everything. Your article is truly eye opening and should not be dismissed because we have established believes. We need to rip the facade off and open our eyes end explore all possibilities. these nuclear tests did not happen in a vacuum from which we are isolated.

Expand full comment
author
Apr 30, 2023·edited May 1, 2023Author

AND HOTTER THAN THE TEMPERATURE OF THE SUN. so I say to myself how many times can we explode the temperature of the sun and not have an effect. sure the oceans are going to change. I have not found any measurement of the effect in science and well that's a glaring hole.

Expand full comment

https://rumble.com/v2jz31c-peoples-health-alliance-open-meeting-held-at-paulton-2042023-katherine-macb.html

I watched this video of a public meeting, which I came across on the "World Doctors Alliance" group on the Telegram app, and thought it was a very helpful, constructive, non-threatening approach.

This lady did NONE of the "this is what I know that you ought to know" attitude that you find with 00DEZ, for example. She is merely offering help and support to help people with what they want to achieve, with the situational awareness that they already have.

The difficulty that people experience with the "you need to wake up to this" approach is that not everyone is in the same position, and whilst some (like me) want to know more, many feel threatened and get either defensive, or aggressive, or dismiss things that conflict with how they understand the world currently.

The recognition that people need the help and co-operation of other like-minded people, on the other hand, is pretty universal.

Expand full comment
author

going to watch it. I've had some really great information thrown my way in comments. Which is fantastic.

Expand full comment

Thanks for all your hard work.

It's interesting to note that the phrase "Ground Zero" was a technical term meaning the point on the Earth's surface directly under an aerial nuclear explosion, or over, in the case of a subterranean explosion. Always.

... until OR INCLUDING 9/11.

Expand full comment
author

good point. What do you think about all this heat into the system (hotter than the surface of the sun kind of heat).

Expand full comment

Good research.

Luc

Expand full comment
Apr 29, 2023Liked by LawyerLisa

Interesting to know, thank you for your research! I would enjoy some warming, but not so lucky, where I live we have the same 6 month/year of cold as always. Long ago I looked too into many of these experiments. The stupidest thing I've read about was the american nuclear tourism spiced sometimes with atomic themed cocktails, bunch of explosions just for fun....geee.

Expand full comment

I have known about this for many years. Nothing like trip down memory lane. This is not the cause of Global Warming but it sure as hell did contribute and will contribute to the world wide degradation of the Global Ecosystem. thanks for posting. I will keep that.. all in one place too.

Expand full comment

Hi Lisa,

NOW you are really getting close to TRUTH!

.

Like Covid-19/SARS-Cov-2 was a huge FRAUD - those GANGSTERS at the helm of the American "DEEP STATE" try another huge FRAUD with their criminal "Climate-change" - and NOW DESPERATELY NEED WORLD WAR 3, because "We the People" have started to finally find out their criminal & psychopathic agenda!

.

As long as ALL types of artificial GEOENGINEERING & the widespread use of (depleted) URANIUM as in US & GB-ammunition or in Atomic bombs & Atomic explosions like in Lebanon or WTC are kept TOP SECRET, and the US/Norwegian TERROR-BOMBING on EUROPE's NORTH-STREAM energy supply are carefully kept STATE-SECRETS - THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY IN THE USA - but a kleptocracy and/or plutocracy!

Watch one of Tucker's last interviews:

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/some-recent-media-on-rfk-jrs-run?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68MhtliIAvk

Title:

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr tells Tucker this is turning America into a system of socialism for the rich"

My German conclusion:

So THIS is TOP-SECRET-NAZI-AMERICA - ready & willing to recklessly blow up the entire planet - as "We the People" have started to find out, that almost the entire American democracy has turned criminal & corrupt against "We the People"!

Expand full comment