The truth is, there has been global warming recently – but it started around the time of the Revolutionary war, and today we ******are still BELOW the average of the past 3,000 years.**** And this is not just for Europe, Greenland and North America, yet another red herring that has recently been thrown out by the desperate global warmers. The universality of the Viking and Mediaeval climatic optimums is written about by Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment, shows we are, today, below the three thousand year average, and far below the Medieval Climatic Optimum, albeit far above the LIA. Civil Defense Perspectives, Mar. 2007, Vol. 23, #3, p. 1, notes that evidence for this climatic optimum has been found in all but 2 out of 103 locations where it was examined for, including Asia, Africa, South America and the western U.S. The Kegwin graph of temperature in the Sargasso Sea tells you all you need to know (note: that big horizontal line running across the page is the 3,000 year average!), Interestingly, the warmer times coincided not only with the best harvests, but also the least amount of major storm activity.
I haven't begun yet. I was merely viewing some extremely unsettling videos that were featured in this article. It appears that we are encountering dangers from various origins, ranging from the environment to the food we consume:
I watched your presentation on Rumble and found the information to be unsettling. It appears that the elites have been planning behind the backs of We the People for decades, and now we are witnessing the completion of their plan right before our eyes. Unfortunately, Egypsius's analysis of our chances of defeating these monsters at their game is not optimistic.
I don't mean to suggest that we give up, but the likelihood of winning doesn't look promising. Just because 'PP' and Ms. Leslyn Lewis are vocal about their opposition to these societal changes, it doesn't necessarily mean that it can be stopped. I feel really sad about that.
PS: Egypsius is a retired German university professor.
that you pick up this latest SCAM, to JUSTIFY western STEALTH TERRORISM.
.
The very best, most honest & pure LOGIC article I came across lately on CLIMATE-CHANGE is from the very COURAGEOUS Dr. Denis G. Rancourt, who has gotten into the crossfires of the climate CULT, like almost all honest researchers lately . . .
OUR DEEPEST FAILURE - FACING THE AMERICAN DEEP STATE - IS OUR CONTINUING NEGLECT OF THE BASIC LAW IN JUSTICE:
"AUDIATUR ET ALTERA PARS!" which means: "Listen to the OTHER side!"
.
If we continue on this path - the current TRAITORS of "We The People" & the American CONSTITUTION - will bring an end to our civilization with their WAR against RUSSIA!
"Transcript Putin Televised Speech February 24, 2022"
If you carefully READ & UNDERSTAND this well translated document - you will know the future of this planet - and you will have no more doubts about those criminal PSYCHOPATHS, that run Washington, the Pentagon, the CIA & everything we call the "WESTERN WORLD" or the "STEALTH DEEP STATE", chronically in TREASON with "We The People".
An article by well-known weatherman John Coleman at KUSI.com also discusses the forcing, or runaway global warming phenomenon at http://www.kusi.com/story/14072205/global-warming noting “It is true that CO2 can absorb heat a little faster than nitrogen and oxygen but it becomes no hotter because it cannot absorb any more heat than there is available to the other gases. This is against the laws of thermodynamics. All gases share their heat with the other gases. Gas molecules fly around and are constantly colliding with other gas molecules so they immediately lose any excess heat to other molecules during these collisions. That's why the air is all one temperature in any limited volume.• Even if CO2 levels were many times higher, radiative heating physics shows that it would make virtually no difference to temperature because it has a very limited heating ability. With CO2, the more there is, the less it heats because it quickly becomes saturated. For a detailed explanation go to: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html.” As evidence, the article cites Venus and Mars, that have atmospheres that are almost entirely CO2 (97%), yet have no runaway global warming, as well as noting that in the past the Earth has had CO2 concentrations hundreds of times higher, yet there were ice ages at the same time.
Dr. Fred Singer, states about water vapor in the Aug., 2007 edition of Imprimus: “…it is quite possible that the water vapor feedback is negative rather than positive and thereby reduces the effect of CO2.” . Singer notes this could be done several possible ways: if CO2 increases warming of the ocean there could be a higher rate of evaporation, leading to more cloudiness and humidity. The resulting low clouds would then reflect incoming solar radiation back into space, thus cooling the earth. It appears even the water vapor issue is, uh, cloudy, and in any event, any way you cut it, examples like these illustrate the self-regulating nature of earth, within a broad range, which is seen throughout the ages, again and again.
Further to the “feedback loop” question, Brian Hall has written in “Runawaylessness”
That “The postulate of positive feedback in the system (i.e., that water vapor multiplies the effect of CO2, which raises air and ocean temperatures driving even more CO2 and H2O into the atmosphere, and so on) has been disproven soundly in thorough experimentation ... by Planet Earth. The geological record shows that every combination of low and high CO2 (slightly lower than present up to 20X current numbers) and high and low temperature (from tropical poles to ice sheets nearly to the equator) has been tried, at great length, and no "runaway" has occurred. The minute range of values we're now experiencing and playing with thus has no more chance of causing runaway than spitting in the ocean has of causing a tsunami.
If solar activity were decreasing and earth's temperature were increasing, then carbon dioxide induced warming would be a reasonable theory. However, there is no evidence that solar activity has decreased over the last 30 years and it is more reasonable to conclude that the warming seen over the last 30 years is completely natural. This is also confirmed by recent evidence of warming on Mars, Jupiter, Neptune, and Pluto which do not have human populations burning hydrocarbons.” And Venus as an example of runaway greenhouse effect, with ~96% CO2? There IS no greenhouse effect, as the major greenhouse gas, water vapor, is missing. Little direct sunlight reaches the surface, but the high surface pressure, 92 times that of earth can explain most of that temp. (As a side note, some of Earth’s temperature is produced internally At 80 miles down, at the Mohorovicic Discontinuity, the temperature is around 900 C, and by 1500 miles deep the temperature reaches 3,700 C. Below that, at the Gutenberg Discontinuity, molten rock becomes pure iron and nickel, and below that, the tremendous pressure creates temperatures up to 7000 C – hotter than the sun’s surface. The other half of the Earth’s heat comes from the breakdown of uranium and thorium.)
On the other side of the equator, Australian solar researcher Dr. David Archibald has noted the solar cycle is usually around 11 years from minimum to minimum, with the past cycle 23 lasting 12.7 years. Significantly, the long length of a solar cycle has been historically shown to have significant climate significance, and Archibald “has shown that for every one year increase in the solar cycle length there is a half degree Celsius drop in the global temperature in the next cycle. Using that relationship we could expect a global temperature drop of one degree Fahrenheit by 2020. That would wipe out all of the global warming of the last 150 years!” A 14 June, 2010 article in New Scientist by Stuart Clark also notes “But for the past two years, the sunspots have mostly been missing. Their absence, the most prolonged for nearly a hundred years, has taken even seasoned sun watchers by surprise. "This is solar behaviour we haven't seen in living memory," says David Hathaway, a physicist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.” Significantly, this article also noted those not-so-trustworthy computer models had predicted when the sunspots returned, they would do so in force – except they haven’t – numbers are far below expectations.
So, its not a conspiracy that the Globalists are lying and using several hoaxes including climate change to enact a brutal Technocratic Totalitarian state and enslave humanity?
I feel that the fear mongering is at an unbelievable rate. Is ⚠️ someone predicting the next emergency for the lockdown and wealth transfer? Is it for more surveillance? I will apologize, I am just very cynical.
I'm just on lunch break & can't process all that, much less references. Just want to drop this, maybe yuo have a comment.
Ivor Cummins posted an old clip about ice core drillings, where the seeming conclusion was similar - that it was warmer tens or hundreds of thousands of years back than now, and we see rise because we started measuring at the end of an ice age.
Then this guy on youtube, former geologist, "Potholer54" made a response to that, where he seemed to explain why it's not so this time, and unlike in the old clip from the 90s, it is now meanwhile no longer true that it isn't warmer than how far those ice core drilligns go back.
Have you seen that / care to comment?
Now I'm aware that that guy is the go-to for many people who just want to belive in what "the authorities" say and he seems to confirm it. But he always shows references and explains things in a calm manner, without "dissing" anyone ad-personam, unlike some other people, on both sides.
The truth is, there has been global warming recently – but it started around the time of the Revolutionary war, and today we ******are still BELOW the average of the past 3,000 years.**** And this is not just for Europe, Greenland and North America, yet another red herring that has recently been thrown out by the desperate global warmers. The universality of the Viking and Mediaeval climatic optimums is written about by Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment, shows we are, today, below the three thousand year average, and far below the Medieval Climatic Optimum, albeit far above the LIA. Civil Defense Perspectives, Mar. 2007, Vol. 23, #3, p. 1, notes that evidence for this climatic optimum has been found in all but 2 out of 103 locations where it was examined for, including Asia, Africa, South America and the western U.S. The Kegwin graph of temperature in the Sargasso Sea tells you all you need to know (note: that big horizontal line running across the page is the 3,000 year average!), Interestingly, the warmer times coincided not only with the best harvests, but also the least amount of major storm activity.
Or let’s put it another way, from the Dansgaard & Johnson study, as here on ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Average-near-surface-temperatures-of-the-northern-hemisphere-during-the-past-11000-years_fig5_313127868
I must say, your explanation of the so-called "climate hoax" is one of the most well-written and informative pieces I have come across thus far. - Luc
Did you see this?
https://rumble.com/v2uo9nk-c40-cities-the-future-of-urban-consumption-in-a-1.5c-world.html
Thanks to your suggestion, I have recently become a member of Action4Canada. - Luc
I haven't begun yet. I was merely viewing some extremely unsettling videos that were featured in this article. It appears that we are encountering dangers from various origins, ranging from the environment to the food we consume:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/connecting-dots-with-docs-vids?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=667911&post_id=129387040&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
I watched your presentation on Rumble and found the information to be unsettling. It appears that the elites have been planning behind the backs of We the People for decades, and now we are witnessing the completion of their plan right before our eyes. Unfortunately, Egypsius's analysis of our chances of defeating these monsters at their game is not optimistic.
I don't mean to suggest that we give up, but the likelihood of winning doesn't look promising. Just because 'PP' and Ms. Leslyn Lewis are vocal about their opposition to these societal changes, it doesn't necessarily mean that it can be stopped. I feel really sad about that.
PS: Egypsius is a retired German university professor.
Encl.
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/the-limits-of-populist-resistance?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=268621&post_id=129231613&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
THANK YOU LISA -
that you pick up this latest SCAM, to JUSTIFY western STEALTH TERRORISM.
.
The very best, most honest & pure LOGIC article I came across lately on CLIMATE-CHANGE is from the very COURAGEOUS Dr. Denis G. Rancourt, who has gotten into the crossfires of the climate CULT, like almost all honest researchers lately . . .
.
But judge for yourself:
http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-truth-or-dare.html
This excellent essay of brilliant logic & scientific INTEGRITY is of February 27, 2007 ! ! !
OUR DEEPEST FAILURE - FACING THE AMERICAN DEEP STATE - IS OUR CONTINUING NEGLECT OF THE BASIC LAW IN JUSTICE:
"AUDIATUR ET ALTERA PARS!" which means: "Listen to the OTHER side!"
.
If we continue on this path - the current TRAITORS of "We The People" & the American CONSTITUTION - will bring an end to our civilization with their WAR against RUSSIA!
So listen to the OTHER side here too:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/russia/putins-comments-on-nuclear-weapons/
Title:
"Transcript Putin Televised Speech February 24, 2022"
If you carefully READ & UNDERSTAND this well translated document - you will know the future of this planet - and you will have no more doubts about those criminal PSYCHOPATHS, that run Washington, the Pentagon, the CIA & everything we call the "WESTERN WORLD" or the "STEALTH DEEP STATE", chronically in TREASON with "We The People".
An article by well-known weatherman John Coleman at KUSI.com also discusses the forcing, or runaway global warming phenomenon at http://www.kusi.com/story/14072205/global-warming noting “It is true that CO2 can absorb heat a little faster than nitrogen and oxygen but it becomes no hotter because it cannot absorb any more heat than there is available to the other gases. This is against the laws of thermodynamics. All gases share their heat with the other gases. Gas molecules fly around and are constantly colliding with other gas molecules so they immediately lose any excess heat to other molecules during these collisions. That's why the air is all one temperature in any limited volume.• Even if CO2 levels were many times higher, radiative heating physics shows that it would make virtually no difference to temperature because it has a very limited heating ability. With CO2, the more there is, the less it heats because it quickly becomes saturated. For a detailed explanation go to: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html.” As evidence, the article cites Venus and Mars, that have atmospheres that are almost entirely CO2 (97%), yet have no runaway global warming, as well as noting that in the past the Earth has had CO2 concentrations hundreds of times higher, yet there were ice ages at the same time.
Dr. Fred Singer, states about water vapor in the Aug., 2007 edition of Imprimus: “…it is quite possible that the water vapor feedback is negative rather than positive and thereby reduces the effect of CO2.” . Singer notes this could be done several possible ways: if CO2 increases warming of the ocean there could be a higher rate of evaporation, leading to more cloudiness and humidity. The resulting low clouds would then reflect incoming solar radiation back into space, thus cooling the earth. It appears even the water vapor issue is, uh, cloudy, and in any event, any way you cut it, examples like these illustrate the self-regulating nature of earth, within a broad range, which is seen throughout the ages, again and again.
Further to the “feedback loop” question, Brian Hall has written in “Runawaylessness”
That “The postulate of positive feedback in the system (i.e., that water vapor multiplies the effect of CO2, which raises air and ocean temperatures driving even more CO2 and H2O into the atmosphere, and so on) has been disproven soundly in thorough experimentation ... by Planet Earth. The geological record shows that every combination of low and high CO2 (slightly lower than present up to 20X current numbers) and high and low temperature (from tropical poles to ice sheets nearly to the equator) has been tried, at great length, and no "runaway" has occurred. The minute range of values we're now experiencing and playing with thus has no more chance of causing runaway than spitting in the ocean has of causing a tsunami.
If solar activity were decreasing and earth's temperature were increasing, then carbon dioxide induced warming would be a reasonable theory. However, there is no evidence that solar activity has decreased over the last 30 years and it is more reasonable to conclude that the warming seen over the last 30 years is completely natural. This is also confirmed by recent evidence of warming on Mars, Jupiter, Neptune, and Pluto which do not have human populations burning hydrocarbons.” And Venus as an example of runaway greenhouse effect, with ~96% CO2? There IS no greenhouse effect, as the major greenhouse gas, water vapor, is missing. Little direct sunlight reaches the surface, but the high surface pressure, 92 times that of earth can explain most of that temp. (As a side note, some of Earth’s temperature is produced internally At 80 miles down, at the Mohorovicic Discontinuity, the temperature is around 900 C, and by 1500 miles deep the temperature reaches 3,700 C. Below that, at the Gutenberg Discontinuity, molten rock becomes pure iron and nickel, and below that, the tremendous pressure creates temperatures up to 7000 C – hotter than the sun’s surface. The other half of the Earth’s heat comes from the breakdown of uranium and thorium.)
On the other side of the equator, Australian solar researcher Dr. David Archibald has noted the solar cycle is usually around 11 years from minimum to minimum, with the past cycle 23 lasting 12.7 years. Significantly, the long length of a solar cycle has been historically shown to have significant climate significance, and Archibald “has shown that for every one year increase in the solar cycle length there is a half degree Celsius drop in the global temperature in the next cycle. Using that relationship we could expect a global temperature drop of one degree Fahrenheit by 2020. That would wipe out all of the global warming of the last 150 years!” A 14 June, 2010 article in New Scientist by Stuart Clark also notes “But for the past two years, the sunspots have mostly been missing. Their absence, the most prolonged for nearly a hundred years, has taken even seasoned sun watchers by surprise. "This is solar behaviour we haven't seen in living memory," says David Hathaway, a physicist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.” Significantly, this article also noted those not-so-trustworthy computer models had predicted when the sunspots returned, they would do so in force – except they haven’t – numbers are far below expectations.
There is a link between CO2 and warming, but inconveniently the rise in CO2 has ALWAYS followed a rise in temperature, not caused it.
Bravo!
So, its not a conspiracy that the Globalists are lying and using several hoaxes including climate change to enact a brutal Technocratic Totalitarian state and enslave humanity?
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/national-temperature-index/time-series/anom-tavg/12/5
I feel that the fear mongering is at an unbelievable rate. Is ⚠️ someone predicting the next emergency for the lockdown and wealth transfer? Is it for more surveillance? I will apologize, I am just very cynical.
I read Electroverse first every morning. I find it on Telegram. Very informative
Love the occams razor approach.
I'm a longtime reader of wattsupwiththat.
You are most assuredly correct.
This hammers home the point in 4 minutes! https://youtu.be/L1mjG_F8ppw
I'm just on lunch break & can't process all that, much less references. Just want to drop this, maybe yuo have a comment.
Ivor Cummins posted an old clip about ice core drillings, where the seeming conclusion was similar - that it was warmer tens or hundreds of thousands of years back than now, and we see rise because we started measuring at the end of an ice age.
Then this guy on youtube, former geologist, "Potholer54" made a response to that, where he seemed to explain why it's not so this time, and unlike in the old clip from the 90s, it is now meanwhile no longer true that it isn't warmer than how far those ice core drilligns go back.
Have you seen that / care to comment?
Now I'm aware that that guy is the go-to for many people who just want to belive in what "the authorities" say and he seems to confirm it. But he always shows references and explains things in a calm manner, without "dissing" anyone ad-personam, unlike some other people, on both sides.
He does _seem_ genuine to me, but IDK.
They think of us as useless eaters, cannon fodder.
They were looking for an enemy to unite humanity. They made us the enemy. “The Common Enemy of Humanity is Man”
“We came up with the idea of pollution, global warming, water shortages and the like will fit the bill.”
(Let’s fool the cannon fodder, useless humans)
They made us the enemy of the whole world.
⬇️
Sandi Adams
UK COLUMN
Agenda 2030 — Part 1
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/agenda-2030-part-1
I didn't know you had a science degree Lisa. That's cool. Like Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merckel.
UK COLUMN PATRICK MOORE
“WE ARE IN AN ICE AGE”
Sensible Environmentalism—Patrick Moore
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/sensible-environmentalism-patrick-moore