Do the Ice Ages disprove Man Made Global Warming. Yep
Theme: The green boots are communist totalitarian con-men
I am going to dumb down “Climate Change” for you to empower you and educate who it is you can. I studied the traditional climate change at University, and I hold a science HNS. degree in Environmental Science and a Minor in Chemistry prior to my LLB and LLM.
From a first principled Notion, (where I like to always start):
For there to be several Ice Ages, there must be several Inter-glacial periods. The hotter times between Ice Ages.
Right? Right.
For there to be INTER-GLACIAL periods, there must be warming.
Right? Right.
Heat is what causes ice to melt and ‘retreat’.
Correct? Correct.
If we have had several ice ages, then we have had several Inter-Glacial periods?
Right? Right.
Some of them happened LONG BEFORE HUMANS AND LONG BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL PERIOD.
Correct? Correct.
According to the Government of Utah
'“At least five major ice ages have occurred throughout Earth’s history: the earliest was over 2 billion years ago, and the most recent one began approximately 3 million years ago and continues today (yes, we live in an ice age!). Currently, we are in a warm interglacial that began about 11,000 years ago. The last period of glaciation, which is often informally called the “Ice Age,” peaked about 20,000 years ago. At that time, the world was on average probably about 10°F (5°C) colder than today, and locally as much as 40°F (22°C) colder.”
John Kerry and the ALARMISTS et al want to keep us focused on 1880 to present.
Right? right.
Is that where you should stay looking, where they want you to?
No. Not at all.
Image from the government of Utah.
What you should notice is when looking at the Inter-glacial Periods are as follows:
the temperatures peaked in Inter-Glacial period from 35 to above 40 degrees ALL SIGNIFICANTLY PRIOR TO THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND THE burning of fossil fuels.
so ergo based on that you can assume it is an actual GIVEN that the GLOBE warms in interglacial periods and has done so SEVERAL TIMES independent of HUMAN activity.
SO PLEASE DRUM ROLL: WARMING IS INDEPENDENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY.
Were you around for the last major retreat of the Glaciers, or inter-glacial periods? Did glacial periods come back because we had technocrats to install an app on your phone or in your body to monitor your C02?
NOOO.
Did the Inter-glacial periods have SMART cities and C40 cities imposed in order to bring back the glacial periods?
NOOO.
DO we want a Glacial Period right now with much of North America covered in Ice? (may depend if Trudolt is under the Ice for some)
“Glacials and interglacials occur in fairly regular repeated cycles. The timing is governed to a large degree by predictable cyclic changes in Earth’s orbit, which affect the amount of sunlight reaching different parts of Earth’s surface.
The three orbital variations are:
(1) changes in Earth’s orbit around the Sun (eccentricity),
(2) shifts in the tilt of Earth’s axis (obliquity), and
(3) the wobbling motion of Earth’s axis (precession).”
WHAT????
not your SUV, your Nat Gas stove or furnace. But changes in the Earths Orbit, governed by 3 orbital variations.
So if you look at how many glacial and interglacial periods they have been and where they are vis a vis human activity: you disprove Human caused Global Warming.
If you look at Climate Change over that period, you see Climate does change, but it has nothing to do with what John Kerry fills the cocktail hours droning on about at WEF meetings.
If you look at the temperatures, we are not even close to the hottest time period. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
THE SCIENCE IS NOT SETTLED.
Is THE TRADEMARK SCIENCE SETTLED? Whatever. that’s a non-sequitur. Why should people who believe in non-sequiturs be able to use non-sequiturs to govern our lives.
Take a really good look at this graph. What I want you to notice.
Average Global Temperature (AGT) is plotted on the vertical access;
Today’s AGT is actually PRETTY LOW EH;
in fact once you are not looking at the John Kerry 1880 to 2023 graph you notice we are actually NOT in an alarmist scenario.
WHEN they Define what you get to look at, and the information you receive, it becomes the biggest deception of all.
THE MONEY being spent by this alarmist crew at the CBC CTV, CNN, BBC NYT et al is to reinforce the need for us to give up our way of lives, indeed by definition our lives for their TRADEMARK CALAMITY.
Yes we are in an interglacial period but if that fact causes your Government and NGOs and Captured Companies, Hollywood pervs, and Climate Alarmists to use that as the basis to give up capitalism in favor of repressive, totalitarian, communism and prison like measured, existence? Its because someone wants to profit from it.
AND you are being imprisoned for being conned. They are con-men. And through the con they write the profits direct to their bank accounts.
I hope I helped you reach the conclusion that there is ZERO link between CO2 and temperature. ZERO link between climate change and human activity. And more importantly, there is no ‘settled science’, only the use of NON-SEQUITURS to justify absurdities.
We don’t need to be protected from Climate Change: But from the lies and the liars using lies to invoke a restriction in our Fundamental Rights.
Please watch a converted Climate Scientist and Aerospace Engineer.
Give me your likes, subscriptions, upgrades, comments and shares! I’m in this to WIN. Let’s do it together!
The truth is, there has been global warming recently – but it started around the time of the Revolutionary war, and today we ******are still BELOW the average of the past 3,000 years.**** And this is not just for Europe, Greenland and North America, yet another red herring that has recently been thrown out by the desperate global warmers. The universality of the Viking and Mediaeval climatic optimums is written about by Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment, shows we are, today, below the three thousand year average, and far below the Medieval Climatic Optimum, albeit far above the LIA. Civil Defense Perspectives, Mar. 2007, Vol. 23, #3, p. 1, notes that evidence for this climatic optimum has been found in all but 2 out of 103 locations where it was examined for, including Asia, Africa, South America and the western U.S. The Kegwin graph of temperature in the Sargasso Sea tells you all you need to know (note: that big horizontal line running across the page is the 3,000 year average!), Interestingly, the warmer times coincided not only with the best harvests, but also the least amount of major storm activity.
Or let’s put it another way, from the Dansgaard & Johnson study, as here on ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Average-near-surface-temperatures-of-the-northern-hemisphere-during-the-past-11000-years_fig5_313127868
I must say, your explanation of the so-called "climate hoax" is one of the most well-written and informative pieces I have come across thus far. - Luc