This stack by Moriarity is incredibly important. While we are looking at either war or war footing in various arenas, or the WHO, there have been important domestication of the Treaty. This is for the US. “There are certain subjects I and an untold number of others have been following since the 2020 debacle. An inflection point in our history if I say so myself. This is one of them.
Great article. Yes the millimeter by millimeter phase has been progressing steadily unfortunately. With very few noticing what has been implemented or taken away. The bill Brandon is proposing stateside is going to ruffle the patriotic feathers undoubtedly. Maybe that’s one plus.
I was also wondering how Trudeau will act on this..guaranteed he will be eager to join in lockstep with the ice cream man south of the border for the climate lockdown for sure. Remains to be seen if he lets the WHO do his dirty work and just take us over, or follow Bidens lead. Trudeau it seems has nothing to lose at this stage. He will lose an election unless they can rig it with mail in ballots due to lockdowns. My gut feeling is that the climate lockdown happen, people will mass non-comply, demonstrate and protest. Things will get ugly due to the incitement of violence from undercover government players and bingo, here comes the next emergency act and a cancellation of the 2025 election. He keeps his dictatorship with absolute power and control and nobody to answer to, except his handlers. I hope I’m 100% wrong on this..but the gut says otherwise. They are playing end game tactics now given the uncertainty of the elections. Sadly I think this will end in violence when the masses wake up to the reality of the new normal about to be shoved down their throats. Hope for the best..Prepare for the worst.
I had shared this document on my Substack a long time ago. It is in preparation for the WHA meeting in May 2024. They have the implementation plan all worked out. The WHO won't steal our sovereignty our governments will give it to them. Truth be told they already have. People better wake up real fast. I am sure Canada has a similar document prepared or they will just copy the US document.
In Ellul the characteristics of the technical phenomenon are Autonomy, Unity, Universality, Totalization. Technique obeys a specific rationality. The characteristics of technical progress are progress are self-augmentation, automization, absence of limits, casual progression, a tendency toward acceleration, disparity, and ambivalence. Nevertheless, technique is lacking in one of the essential characteristics found in any organized ensemble, reaction. It is not yet able to control its errors and dysfunctions, to react on its source and modify itself. However, we may now be in the presence of the progressive elaboration of such a reactive capability. The ethical problem, that is human behavior, can only be considered in relation to this system, not in relation to some particular technical object or other. Learning how to use “rightly” or “do good” with such and such a technique does not much matter, since each technique can only be interpreted within the ensemble. If technique is a milieu and a system, the ethical problem can only be posed in terms of this global operation. Behavior and particular choices no longer have much significance. What is required is thus a global change in our habits or values, the rediscovery of either an existential ethics or a new ontology.
Berdyaev writes - The rationalisation, the technisation, the machinisation of the whole of human life and of the human soul itself cannot but provoke a reaction against itself. This reaction existed during the XIX Century. The romantics always protested against the might of technology, the dissociating of the organic wholeness, and they appealed to nature, to the elemental foundation within man. A strident protest against technology was made by Ruskin. He did not want to reconcile even with the railroad and he journeyed in a carriage parallel to the rail tracks. The romantic reaction against technology is understandable and even indispensible, but it is impotent, it either does not decide the problem or it resolves it too easily. To return to former times, to the organic lifestyle, to the patriarchal relationships, to the old forms of the familial economy and handicrafts, to the life with nature, with the land, with plants and animals, is impossible. And indeed this return would be undesirable, for it is connected with an exploitive use of people and animals. In this is the tragedy of the position. And it remains but for spirit creatively to define its own relationship towards technology and towards the new epoch, to master technology in the name of its own ends. Christianity ought creatively to define an attitude towards the new actuality. It cannot be too optimistic. But it also cannot run away from the human reality. This presupposes an exertion of spirituality, an intensification of the inner spiritual life. Soul-emotive sentimentalism within Christianity has become already impossible. Soulful emotionality cannot bear up under the harsh reality. Indifference is possible only for the hardened, the obdurate spirit. Spirit can be an organiser, it can master the technical for its own spiritual ends, but it would have to resist itself being turned into a tool of the organising technical process. In this is the tragedy of spirit.
"Take down the Beast" The Beast of Rev is up and running seeking full control and most Christians are blind! Thank you soldier (Lisa)!
Great article. Yes the millimeter by millimeter phase has been progressing steadily unfortunately. With very few noticing what has been implemented or taken away. The bill Brandon is proposing stateside is going to ruffle the patriotic feathers undoubtedly. Maybe that’s one plus.
I was also wondering how Trudeau will act on this..guaranteed he will be eager to join in lockstep with the ice cream man south of the border for the climate lockdown for sure. Remains to be seen if he lets the WHO do his dirty work and just take us over, or follow Bidens lead. Trudeau it seems has nothing to lose at this stage. He will lose an election unless they can rig it with mail in ballots due to lockdowns. My gut feeling is that the climate lockdown happen, people will mass non-comply, demonstrate and protest. Things will get ugly due to the incitement of violence from undercover government players and bingo, here comes the next emergency act and a cancellation of the 2025 election. He keeps his dictatorship with absolute power and control and nobody to answer to, except his handlers. I hope I’m 100% wrong on this..but the gut says otherwise. They are playing end game tactics now given the uncertainty of the elections. Sadly I think this will end in violence when the masses wake up to the reality of the new normal about to be shoved down their throats. Hope for the best..Prepare for the worst.
Definitely the Biden climate emergency coincides with the WHO pandemic treaty. I pray that God stop the evil plans of the WHO,WEF, and UN.
I had shared this document on my Substack a long time ago. It is in preparation for the WHA meeting in May 2024. They have the implementation plan all worked out. The WHO won't steal our sovereignty our governments will give it to them. Truth be told they already have. People better wake up real fast. I am sure Canada has a similar document prepared or they will just copy the US document.
Thank you❣️
In Ellul the characteristics of the technical phenomenon are Autonomy, Unity, Universality, Totalization. Technique obeys a specific rationality. The characteristics of technical progress are progress are self-augmentation, automization, absence of limits, casual progression, a tendency toward acceleration, disparity, and ambivalence. Nevertheless, technique is lacking in one of the essential characteristics found in any organized ensemble, reaction. It is not yet able to control its errors and dysfunctions, to react on its source and modify itself. However, we may now be in the presence of the progressive elaboration of such a reactive capability. The ethical problem, that is human behavior, can only be considered in relation to this system, not in relation to some particular technical object or other. Learning how to use “rightly” or “do good” with such and such a technique does not much matter, since each technique can only be interpreted within the ensemble. If technique is a milieu and a system, the ethical problem can only be posed in terms of this global operation. Behavior and particular choices no longer have much significance. What is required is thus a global change in our habits or values, the rediscovery of either an existential ethics or a new ontology.
https://ellul.org/themes/ellul-and-technique/
Berdyaev writes - The rationalisation, the technisation, the machinisation of the whole of human life and of the human soul itself cannot but provoke a reaction against itself. This reaction existed during the XIX Century. The romantics always protested against the might of technology, the dissociating of the organic wholeness, and they appealed to nature, to the elemental foundation within man. A strident protest against technology was made by Ruskin. He did not want to reconcile even with the railroad and he journeyed in a carriage parallel to the rail tracks. The romantic reaction against technology is understandable and even indispensible, but it is impotent, it either does not decide the problem or it resolves it too easily. To return to former times, to the organic lifestyle, to the patriarchal relationships, to the old forms of the familial economy and handicrafts, to the life with nature, with the land, with plants and animals, is impossible. And indeed this return would be undesirable, for it is connected with an exploitive use of people and animals. In this is the tragedy of the position. And it remains but for spirit creatively to define its own relationship towards technology and towards the new epoch, to master technology in the name of its own ends. Christianity ought creatively to define an attitude towards the new actuality. It cannot be too optimistic. But it also cannot run away from the human reality. This presupposes an exertion of spirituality, an intensification of the inner spiritual life. Soul-emotive sentimentalism within Christianity has become already impossible. Soulful emotionality cannot bear up under the harsh reality. Indifference is possible only for the hardened, the obdurate spirit. Spirit can be an organiser, it can master the technical for its own spiritual ends, but it would have to resist itself being turned into a tool of the organising technical process. In this is the tragedy of spirit.