BILL 36 Drastic Totalitarian Legislation blue print for Regulatory bodies

AND A COUP THAT INCORPORATES FOREIGN LAWS YOU HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN!!

I believe this Bill 36 in BC is an egregious and very serious act that must not stand in CANADA. it should be examined by lawyers everywhere as this is the FORMULA legislation on taking the Regulation of a Professional Body and WEAPONIZING THEM in terms of stripping out courts, civil procedures, politicizing requirements, making any person liable WITHIN kangaroo courts that lead to serious Jail time and fines that aren’t topped at 2years and not topped at 200k but at LT’s discretion for FALSE INFORMATION. They violate Charter principles, the Rule law, lack coherent civil procedure concepts and act to change society DRASTICALLY.

Moreover this is the direction all Professional bodies are headed. It corrals citizens within and without professional bodies. We want to know what CCP interference in Canada (and possibly in BC the province closest to the CCP) could have netted us: This legislation and all other watching Canada and restricting their freedoms and reducing the Rule of Law IMO must be hints at what that interference netted us.

Hearings on False and Misleading information have zero protections.

It is also a COUP LEGISLATION as it ‘incorporates' LAWS that aren’t even written yet from Foreign Jurisdiction’.

Tell me without Telling me that you don’t work for your government and your people. That accountability is not paramount in your drafting.

Consider also it purports to have extra-jurisdictional consequences.

THIS NEEDS TO BE SHARED EVERYWHERE. ESPECIALLY TO CITIZENS OF BC.

Weaponizing laws against citizens. These are flying fast and hard.

In Canada there is one Province that is ‘LEADING THE REST’, in oppressions against the under-vaccinated. The issue of vaccine is the ‘red herring’ in the professional regulations Bill. (passed). The collection and manner in which it purports to organize professionals, restrict speech broadly outside of the regulatory mechanism, and penalize dissent with search, seizure, property seizure, prison, and exorbitant fines are done WITHOUT the protections of the Rule of Law and without normal accountability. They are done in such a fashion that if allowed to stand alter our society fundamentally. They are a regrouping of power never before seen before.

It is also the theme that you see in other professional bodies. This act NOW passed is how we can view our professional body regulations. The professions will become bastions of group think with dissent under foot and quashed as fast as a mosquito under my slap.

This Bill does not merely an over reach on speech against future public health issues, or on the issue of vaccination. This goes to the nub of freedom, civil liberties more broadly, freedom of speech, notions of government over reach, etc. It is how the power is organized. We see already the topics that we are not allowed to discuss on social media in other professional bodies. This power structure is the Blue Print. This is the how of our future Totalitarian society. This in the anathema of Canada. AND IF WE DON’T RISE TO THE OCCAISION, AS CITIZENS, AS PROFESSIONALS AND AS LAWYERS, THEN WE LEAVE, in our complacency a great nation squandered to ‘convenience’ and ‘contemptable political correctness’.

IMO if you teach a population the worst offense is to be offensive then, in order to win, you must only then teach them that the next political correctness is opposition to your Rule. Being offensive is part of speech and may in fact be necessary to create adequate discussion on the wrongs we are witnessing. I am unafraid to offend you in this review. I do that out of love of my country, constitution, charter, community, family and fellow Canadians.

But still if you are offended by what I write. Your answer is speech not the silencing of mine.

BILL 36 – 2022: HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS ACT

Despite Hospitals closing for insufficient staffing, and mayors asking for vaccine mandate’s to be repealed the Ministry of Health continues to shove this Act down its citizens’ throats.

This act is a behemoth and I cover it in order that the provisions are written. If you find this a bit meandering in terms of melding certain issues and themes, it is because I did not group themes so much as go through the act with my sense of right and wrong in a first principled manner, with the provisions as I encountered them systematically in order.

All regulatory bodies are being streamlined into this type of governance. But not all legislation is drafted in passed. So this Act (passed) is imperative for Professionals to Review. You will see themes whether in stopSOP or in Jordan Peterson facing censure for inter alia supporting a political party/leader (political speech?).

This legislation sets up a set of elite at the top, without accountability, or Rule of Law. I found it offensive that is was drafted and passed. It is one ring to rule them all.

WHO is caught by the act?

4 (1) This section applies for the purposes of any provision of this Act, the regulations or the bylaws that applies to a health profession corporation, a health profession corporation permit or an application for a health profession corporation permit.

(2) A provision referred to in subsection (1) applies to a designated health profession, a regulatory college or a licensee only if a designation regulation as described in section 25 (3) (b) [designation regulation for designated health profession] is made with respect to

(a) the designated health profession, or

(b) the designated health profession governed by the regulatory college or practised by the licensee.

Applies against “FORMER” REGULATED HEALTH PRACTIONER

BUT THE ACT APPLIES ALSO AGAINST ANY FORMER REGULATED HEALTH PRACTIONER.

HOW BROAD IS IT?

5 All powers that may be exercised under this Act against a regulated health practitioner may be exercised against any of the following:

(a) a former regulated health practitioner;

(b) a person whose practice of a health profession was governed under any of the following enactments:

(i) the Chiropractors Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 48;

(ii) the Dentists Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 94;

(iii) the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183;

(iv) the Medical Practitioners Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 285;

(v) the Nurses (Registered) Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 335;

(vi) the Optometrists Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 342;

(vii) the Pharmacists, Pharmacy Operations and Drug Scheduling Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 363;

(viii) the Podiatrists Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 366.

AMBITIOUS ACT HAS A CATCH ALL TO BRING ANYONE IN

But it also has several ‘CATCH ALL’. provisions in 6.

If you have ‘education’, or if you are ‘supervised’ by a health professional you are also caught by the act. This is overreach. Do you file the paperwork? answer the phones?

CAUGHT AGAIN IF Regulating the “occupation” is necessary for promoting the public interest,

then you’re caught

And if ‘regulating the practice of the occupation is necessary’ in their opinion becomes necessary to ‘protect’ the public. So does this mean, you are a blogger in dissent, or an influencer not toing the line? What gets caught by this militant totalitarian act? Occupation is very broad. Are you a religious organization or a rights organization trying to raise awareness on a topic not covered by national ‘media’.

(c) regulation of the practice of the occupation is necessary or advisable

(i) to protect the public from harm, or

(ii) to protect or promote the public interest.

There really is no limit to a creative filing that brings an employee/ former health care setting employee, someone with an education (writing in the area?), someone with an occupation (or pass-time) into a requirement for governance and compliance.

Guiding Principles in 14 are critical race theory and anti-racism

Well the guiding principles include

(i) reconciliation with Indigenous peoples;

(ii) the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;

(iii) the need to address racism and anti-racism issues that are specific to Indigenous peoples, including acknowledging the rights, interests, priorities and concerns that are specific to First Nations peoples, Métis peoples and Inuit peoples, based on distinctions among them

WHO HAS IN INTEREST IN THE HEARING ie can make a complaint against you?

Per 13(d) who the disciplinary board says so. This is beyond the traditional concept of regulating a body vis a vis the professionals actual clients.

Are you discriminating with opinions online like Peterson and waded into a biological man, woman debate? Don’t think kids should make decisions about gender that include surgeries until after 18?

Caught by 13(d) could lose your practice?

And ‘meaningful public engagement’, does that mean anyone has the right to participate in the hearing. And ‘extraterritorial practitioners’. Is that a long-arm provision to reach into other provincial practitioners?

The UN recently released a report recommending decriminalizing all sex acts including pedophilia, and all drug offences; furthermore citing Criminal Law as an offense against Human Rights. Will voicing an opinion on safeguarding children fall afoul of the UN and be caught in this broad act? Very possibly.

ANTIRACISM PRACTICE REQUIRED

the objectives of anti-discrimination measures in conducting regulatory processes and providing health services include both of the following:

(a) to foster physically, culturally, socially, emotionally and spiritually safe practices;

(b) to adopt anti-racism approaches and tools to support these approaches.

What is an emotional social cultural physical or spiritual ‘safe practice’? It is anything those in charge want it to be. You can cause micro-aggressions to those in the public who are ‘favoured’ by the Regulatory board and thereby cause them to conclude that you did NOT foster physical, cultural, social, emotional or spiritual ‘safe practices’.

SIMILAR TYPE PRACTICES CAUGHT

similar types of health services" means types of health services that, in the opinion of the superintendent, are substantially the same as, or similar to, the types of health services provided by persons who practice the health profession or health occupation that is the subject of a designation assessment

So opinion of Superintendent is the measuring stick. Got it.

Weight of evidence and if used will be at election and subject to opinion of Superintendent

superintendent must

(a) develop policies and procedures with respect to both of the following:

(i) how the risk of harm to the public from the practice of a health profession or occupation will be defined, identified and assessed;

(ii) how information obtained under this Division will be weighted and used, and//”

‘Weight of Evidence’ at the ‘Election’ and ‘subject o the opinion’ of the ‘Superintendent’. Therefore ab initio, there is not concept of behaviour that won’t be caught. You don’t know what the ‘offense’ is until the Superintendent forms the opinion. You don’t have the ability to defend it with common principles of the Rule of Law, or Rules of Evidence. Evidence. It’s weight. is part of a superior god’s opinion.

Risk of Harm to the Public: is what exactly. Not conforming with the ‘State’s allowed opinion on insert topic’. The regulation of the professional body is a secondary arm of the state. But it acts to confirm the power structure only. It is a pure weaponization of the laws.

At the end of the ‘Risk Assessment’ the Superintendent can make a recommendation that whatever it is you are doing is ‘caught by the act’. So a Risk Assessment can be a Salem Witch Hunt. So logically, if she weighs the same as a DUCK then she is a Health Professional or caught by virtue of having an “Occupation” that the Superintending thinks should be caught: you are covered by this Act. You will see how dangerous being covered by the Act actually is: for your speech, freedom, ability to stay out of jail, and keep your belongings and ability to practice. This act is a way to silence and punish opposition. And we know it will be used as such. We have the precedents.

Regardless of your political views, do you want such a piece of legislation to stand? that line in the sand where you are gleeful at your political opponents being crushed, will move closer to your feet by inches until your toes are in the trap. How can this be Canada? We’ve legislated Witch Hunts.

To make a decision under this section, the minister must consider the SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT (!!!) and all of the following factors:

(a) the risk of harm to the public; DO YOU GET THE SENSE THE TYPE OF INFORMATION OR ACTION THAT WILL BE CAUGHT

(b) prescribed factors;

(c) other factors that, in the opinion of the minister, are relevant to protecting or promoting the public interest.

Well isn’t that another CATCH ALL: THE SUPERINTENDENT WRTIES THE REPORT; THE RISK OF HARM TO THE PUBLIC IS WHAT THE POWER STRUCTURE WANTS, OR NEEDS IT TO BE. AND THEN ANOTHER OPINION OF THE MINISTER. That opinion will change with what. Who funded his/her election? and then what is the new thing we need to be ‘Safe from’. For our own good. Government for our ‘safety’; is getting to be government we cannot oppose. You may not be there yet. You may still think we should ‘trust’ our government.

It is odd to me, but despite being vaccinated, the minute I saw a cast system being set up in Canada where some citizens had rights and others didn’t I started an outcry. I couldn’t believe any member of the bar or bench could stand by this fundamental alteration of our society. I could only think that they were captured by the notion that ‘government’s new role was to keep us safe’. Keep us safe, you will see if you haven’t means concentrate powers, remove dissent, and freedoms.

OPINION, PROTECTING, PROMOTING PUBLIC INTEREST.

PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES

What is the limit of “public health emergency”. Mpox. New variant?

CO2 in the atmosphere, climate being non-static, new virus, restrictions on surgeries of children to remove sex organs, restrictions on at term abortions? it is what is viewed as such by those in power. Once power accumulates in a government it is difficult to wrench it away. Imagine this is all good because you think this act will be weaponized against your fellow citizens holding different opinions than you. Imagine what that means. Imagine that you want such restrictions on speech or earning a living, or entering a legal establishment, or mobility. Imagine truly what that means.

(Imagine what that means in the era of programmable digital currency).

If you think it is only when power needs to affirm a vaccine (that doesn’t prevent transmission or inoculate against the disease- just change definitions of words to fit your legislation or accumulation of power).

Climate is an emergency of public health? War on foreign soil? An air balloon over air space?

RealNewzNetwork 🇳🇱 @RealNewzNetwork

Seems Canada got the memo, with Dr. Teresa Tam parroting much of the same rhetoric, and suggesting efforts that us plebs must take to combat this public health emergency - including eating plant based foods (and no doubt Synthetic chem slop and eventually bugs)

Dismissing this legislative review because it is politically incorrect to buck the trends on topics we are indoctrinated into is dangerous. Your toes. They get will get closer until the power thus coalesced is ugly to you too. There’s a lot of ‘ we don’t like to talk about covid’, individuals in our society. Either because supporting the ‘mantra’ is religious now in scope; or we are used to having a power check a ‘statement’ for ‘truth’ and are comfortable having an arbiter of ‘truth’ to parse our thought, and statements. (WHY????? I believe in my God given ability to review facts and come to my own conclusions. I believe in my God given ability to reason without a third party providing a stamp of authority on my thought or conclusions).

Maybe because dissenters have shame lobbed upon them, so standing near them or even defending them is ‘politically incorrect’. Only the stalwarts can handle the heat?

The We ‘are so over that’. the “life has moved on”, people.

Well that hasn’t happened for those in Power. Power in legislation is being granted in ways that we need to address it. And that may or may not include addressing recent wrongs. We either have to understand that what’s good for the gander is good for the goose. Our principles as a Nation are being flayed on the pyre of political correctness. It will take very BIG GOVERNMENT indeed to make us all safe from our opinions. How can we be ready for that because we had a pandemic. That is why it was put through at the same time. ‘Great opportunity for a great reset’. It is time to understand just by thinking through the legislations you are reading. I hope you are reading.

Part 7 – Public Health Emergencies

Division 1 – Emergency Orders Generally

THIS IS WHERE IT GETS DICEY. UNDER AN EMERGENCY ORDER THEY CAN ISSUE A REGULATED ACTION. this implies a positive obligation to do something; ie take a vaccine. But it also says Affecting Regulator who governs Health Practitioner; can DO SOMETHING POSITIVE LIKE TAKE A REGULATED ACTION; this can include the regulator doing something positive to a health practitioner. Later on you will see that other foreign jurisdiction laws you haven’t even seen yet are incorporated by reference.

(THE WHO pandemic treaty and IHR regulations are being passed in silence but you will see team up with all these other regulations being passed. They say what they say, and it does what it does. And my noticing the legislation doesn’t make it a theory: it makes it a fact. it may also be a conspiracy if your MSM isn’t noticing it and tolling the bell.)

Definitions

"public health emergency" means the emergency that is the subject of a notice of public health emergency;

Great. NOW YOU HAVE TO TAKE A REGULATED ACTION. regulated action and positive requirements aren’t limited by your bodily autonomy or concepts of informed consent. It could be any number of things that aren’t enumerated.

"affected regulator" means a regulator that is responsible for governing regulated health practitioners who

(a) are authorized under a designation regulation to take a regulated action, or

(b) are, or are intended to be, authorized under a scope of practice order to take a regulated action;

OPINION OF Provincial Health Officer, redefines ‘consent’: they decide what harm is undue.

IE/ if a third party decides the risk is ‘not undue’ in their opinion that is all that is required. Undue Harm, not having an objective definition, nor having a subjective requirement for the individual’s consent, means ‘undue harm’, is absolutely anything the ‘provincial health officer’ decides. The PHO is appointed by the Superintendent whose ‘Opinions’ we have seen decide alot. Opinion of a Superintendent and now the opinion of PHO displaces normative concepts of informed consent. So we go forward then on a ‘trust’ of a third party’s opinion. STRICTLY THAT IS ALL THAT IT IS.

The Provincial ‘Health Officer” (THESE are just designated by the Superintendent’s Office- head STASI office) can make a practice order (VACCINE ORDER) if it’s her OPINION that its’ ‘NECESSARY’ and in her opinion that taking the practice order is ‘WITHOUT UNDUE RISK OF HARM'.

SO implied within the writing of this is that SOME RISK OF HARM in the PHO’s sole discretion is for them to ACCEPT. So an Opinion: is not vetted; is not proved safe; in fact harm is ok. Undue harm will have a sliding scale. But its for our ‘safety’. And we have to trust ‘the experts’. People appointed who are not ourselves, and who A PRIORI, CANNOT BE TESTED, BECAUSE DISSENTING DOCTORS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS ARE SILENCED VICIOUSLY. There is no harm? to such a regime?

Informed Consent is out the whazoo. Ability to consent is provided to a third party who ‘governs you’. Govern me harder Daddy. Big brother watches and tells you what to think and paternalistic Government decides what you are unable.

333 (1) The provincial health officer may make a scope of practice order if the provincial health officer is of the opinion

(a) that the order is necessary, for a reason referred to in subsection (2), because of circumstances related to a public health emergency, and (Remember that is already broad)

(b) that authorized persons may take the regulated actions specified in the order without undue risk of harm.

the provincial health officer is of the OPINION that the person can take the regulated action specified without (in the PHO’s opinion) undue harm.

So if harm is found done? the answer the PHO’s opinion was that, that 'harm’ was not ‘undue’. This is word smithing at its finest. Prisons of letters, ordered in fashions to circumscribes, peoples, their speech, their freedoms, their informed consent. In my most HUMBLE but vociferous opinion, we have entered the era of WEAPONIZATION OF LEGAL STRUCTURES against the society.

BUT WHEN DO YOU GET TO DO A PRACTICE ORDER? VACCINE or other ORDER. for any number of reasons listed below including CATCH ALL “another reason in the public interest”.

a), a scope of practice order must be necessary for at least one of the following reasons:

(a) the operation of a health regulation adversely affects, in one or more areas of British Columbia,

(i) the timely provision of health services,

(ii) the scope of health services that can be provided, or

(iii) the efficient and effective use of health human resources;

(b) health human resources in one or more areas of British Columbia are insufficient to meet patient needs;

(c) another reason in the public interest.

Public Interest in somebody’s opinion can have drastic consequences within this legislation. Weaponization of legal structures. If the debate is owned because the dissent is silenced how does a populations even frame the harms, access the data, contest the data, keep their position (as we will see even stay out of jail). Since you are caught by this act by virtue of having an ‘occupation’ that it is in the ‘public interest’ that you are caught by the act and on the basis of an OPINION there is no limit to the over-reach potential.

Health Occupation Directors are little mini-gods: like a militarized police state within the state, to appoint and give themselves powers.

368 (1) A health occupation director may, on behalf of a regulatory college or the government, as applicable,

(a) retain or employ persons as investigators, and

(b) employ persons the director considers necessary to assist the director, the director's deputy and investigators to exercise powers or perform duties under this Act.

the minister may, in a designation regulation, do one or more of the following:

******(a) grant powers to and impose duties on the Health Occupation Director that are additional to those provided for under this Act; (WHAT CAN THIS possibly BE; BC legislature doesn’t care: or really cares in one direction only!!!!)

(b) impose requirements, limits and conditions on the exercise of powers or performance of duties by the director;

(c) authorize the director to make rules to do one or more of the following:

(i) impose prohibitions, requirements, limits or conditions on regulated health service providers that are additional to those imposed under a designation regulation;

(ii) modify, waive or provide exemptions from a prohibition, requirement, limit or condition of a designation regulation, with or without limits or conditions.

385 (3) A health occupation director may make rules as follows:

(a) with respect to any matter for which rules are contemplated under this Act;

(b) as the director considers necessary or desirable for carrying out responsibilities as referred to in section 364 [responsibilities of health occupation director].

So these are now weaponized military police in essence. They can provide themselves extra powers. This act is an act with unchecked power: that within the ACT gives the ability to provide further unchecked POWERS: THAT THEY GRANT THEMSELVES. THEY can limit a condition, eliminate the limts, waive or modify existing regulations. So if there are protections in the legislation without the RULE OF LAW, a ‘Health Occupation Director’ can waive their wand. The Gandalf’s of this regime. Nothing stands. Everything shifts. Whoever makes the appointments provides the opinions. This legislation is ALL abuse. And if you like it because you wanted all your friends family and neighbours to be forced vaccinated you are missing a HUGE POINT. we are throwing out the Rule of Law, and the framework of what has been Western democracy in favour of, dare I say it, a communism (sic) where the PUBLIC INTEREST is the deciding factor. But a top down opinion on PUBLIC INTEREST.

Is this even a piece of legislation? or is a coup itself on democracy. what happens when legislation passes that weaponizes legal structures? Immoral v moral laws. These notions themselves cannot even be discussed if speech is cornerned. I have felt for a long time they are coming for the Lawyers Next. When I saw the opinions of doctors ‘in dissent’. silenced. How do we know how vast the dissent is, or how reasonable it is if they are silenced ab initio. Do you want to hand over our futures, our childrens’ futures to unknown god’s with ‘opinions’.

They can make THEIR OWN RULES AS THEY GO ON ANY MATTER UNDER THIS BROAD ACT…. THAT they believe is necessary or wait- not necessary- JUST “DESIRABLE”. Desirable by who/what.

When we say there is CCP interference in our elections. Why aren’t these atrocious bills examined for how they a) approximate western democracies or b) totalitarian and/or communist regimes. We have been pigeon holed into binary versions of dissent. ie the “Not version” of dissent. Do you believe in science. no debate permitted. You have adopted the ‘not version’ thereby you do not believe in science. When we own debate and speech in public institutions, and in the formerly ‘free press’ and on social media, we curate the shifting of society in ways the dissent would have ‘arrested’ with words alone. Words alone.

STATUTORY IMMUNITY

Isn’t that nice. Contemplated that law suits might fly. So they immunize themselves, and the henchmen as a ‘Protected Person’.

Statutory immunity for protected persons jUST put pharma in one of these ‘committees’ and they are insulated too. BADABING BADABOO. If you still trust Pharma and ‘the science’ I have swamp land in Florida. How strong is your thesis, if you cannot sustain dissent. Eventually we will posit ridiculousness and demand it is accepted, by owning ‘the science’, the ‘debate’ or the ‘space we can voice public opinions’.

399 (1) In this section, "protected person" means a person who is any of the following:

(a) a member of a license committee, permit committee or investigation committee;

(b) a registrar, deputy registrar, quality assurance assessor, investigator or capacity officer;

(c) in the case of a health occupation director who is appointed by a board, the health occupation director, the director's deputy or an investigator employed or retained by the director;

(d) an administrator of a support program;

(e) a person who acts under the order or direction of a person referred to in any of paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d).

(2) Subject to subsection (3), no legal proceeding for damages lies or may be commenced or maintained against a protected person because of anything done or omitted

(a) in the exercise or intended exercise of a power under this Act, or

(b) in the performance or intended performance of a duty under this Act.

The requirements for Positive actions in the opinion of the militarized officers (you may think I joke, but I do not. Anyone who makes powers as they go and their opinions un-challengable are the ‘rules’ is operating under a system of Martial Law. That is the suspension of normal concepts of Rule of Law. This will become the norm until we give up our concepts of the Rule of Law. We slide by bits and luge rides into given up what Freedoms our forefathers have fought for. Lest we forget? Or teach a population to want safety over freedom and the Rule of Law. Take it by consent. Or because GOOD MEN DO NOTHING. Who are you in these times?

The rules they find desirable to enforce these positive actions (vaccine requirements, stay at home, don’t travel outside your district, don’t eat meat for the environment etc. etc. this is not conjecture) are arbitrary and capricious and without ability to challenge. THIS WHOLE ACT MUST BE STRUCT AND ALL PROFESSIONALS MUST BE WARNED IN WESTERN DEMOCRACIES THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE NEXT ATTACKS ON FREEDOM. ALL PROFESSIONALS IN ALL WESTERN DEMOCRACIES. The battle lines are set and their are battles everywhere. Who says ‘being safe’ is the best of all things in a society.

The idea that regulators can take positive actions that include some harm to you, they decide the level of harm.

Remember a regulated professional is also at their discretion and includes someone with ‘some type of education’ or someone who has an ‘occupation’ and it is in the public interest to regulate them according to an opinion.

It gets ugly in terms of forced vaccination, or other restrictive mandates we have not envisioned, not having read the ‘opinions’ in the future of those who will govern us. All sorts of nonsense could be someone’s opinion.

What if the ‘emergency’ is climate. What if the ‘cure’ has to do with population. Absurd. Sure, except for reporting rags like NYT covers overpopulation as a calling to help the planet, or cannibalism, or the desire to eat bugs. Who knows the opinions of the future police state this act enables. This discretion, is dystopian because ab initio there is no ability to challenge once the ‘emergency’ and the ‘opinions’ are in place. its a dystopian regime and I’m supposed to think they will have benevolent uses of it rather than dystopian uses. If the means is dystopian why not the meat and potatoes. We have seen abuses in government before. So you suspend your disbelief that a Canadian provincial legislature could pass a bill as dystopian as this, but think they will use it only for our ‘collective benefit’. But I can’t dissent. and Jordan can’t dissent. and good doctors can’t dissent.

If you don’t see the theme, I’m a lousy writer. Because its in the legislation itself.

And the requirement for positive action is Sterility. What if the sterility has to conform with Anti-racism practice. THERE’S JUST NO END TO THE ABUSE this format has; with Emergency, Rules they get to make.

These Regulations you will soon see also the “INCORPORATION OF FOREING LAWS”. Let that sit with you. It’s not enough that opinions give rise to new powers not even drafted. This legislation has to confirm with foreign legislation not even reviewed or drafted. What? what sense of statehood is there left. It is a coup. is a coup. is a coup.

Just let this whole REGIME ABOVE SIT WITH YOU. “Requirement of a Positive Action against a regulated Person”. you opt into the act by having an “education” and if you ‘attempt to practice’ is that have an opinion, or having an ‘occupation’ that is in the public interest in someone’s opinion that you are governed. Govern me harder good NDPers in BC.

So will these REQUIREMENTS OF POSITIVE ACTION against Persons be limited to nurses in the traditional sense? OR ANYONE IN BC. Things this broad need to be struck. Lack of Rule of Law. Tyranny etc.

We are transitioning to another part of the weaponization of this Act; to COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE REGULATED BY THE WORLD AT LARGE, FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.

Making oversight complaints (The JORDON PETERSON SITUATION). who can make an oversight complaint? A person. (ha soon to be an A.I. bot who was mis-gendered)

462 (1) Subject to the regulations, a person may make an oversight complaint by submitting to the superintendent the complaint and all information and records required by the superintendent.

(2) After receiving an oversight complaint, the superintendent

(a) must give written notice to the person who made the complaint that the complaint was received, and

(b) may request further information and records from the person.

WHATS AN OVERSIGHT PROCESS

well you follow the regulations (which if you read the act there’s a lot of ways to issue bylaws and regulations and the Direction of the MINISTER

466 (1) An oversight process, other than a general review, must be conducted in accordance with

(a) the regulations, and

(b) the directions of the minister, in the case of a process conducted on the minister's request.

UNLESS THE OVERSIGHT PROCESS INVOLVES AN INDIGENOUS PERSON IN WHICH CASE ANOTHER SET OF RULES APPLIES

If Indigenous matters

467 (1) The superintendent must collaborate with one or more persons nominated by Indigenous governing bodies or other entities representing Indigenous peoples if an oversight process includes conducting a review of one or more of the following matters:

(a) discrimination or anti-discrimination measures, if Indigenous identity is specifically relevant to the matters being considered;

(b) the delivery of a type of health service, if persons provide health services of that type in accordance with Indigenous practices;

(c) the use of restorative processes that are intended to reflect or be influenced by Indigenous practices;

(d) the nomination process referred to in section 288 (2) [list of support workers].

(2) The superintendent must, in collaboration with Indigenous governing bodies and other entities representing Indigenous peoples, establish policies and procedures for the nomination of persons by those Indigenous governing bodies and other entities for the purposes of this section.

WIN OR LOSE YOU OWE FOR THE INQUIRY

The penalty is imposed even for looking at you. This is how they will win against Peterson issuing exorbitant cost orders for the conducting of the ‘hearings’.

484 Costs and expenses incurred by the government with respect to an inquiry held or a public administrator appointed under this Division are a debt due to the government, and the amount of the costs and expenses may be recovered from the regulatory college that was the subject of the inquiry or appointment in accordance with Division 2 [Recovering Debts Due] of Part 10.

TRANSITIONING: THE next weaponization in this Act is that the little extra-juridicial; this abusive, horrid regime is NEVER Compellable!! you never get to find out what they do; if they have a short list of who they want to come for.

No documents , no discovery, nothing. its an insulated regime within BC CANADA. how they operate. who they prioritize to go against. What information they have on hand before mandating their ‘opinions’ and regulating officers to force you to comply.

You can’t get ANY RECORDS. Are they mandating that you need to have a certain amount of trans surgeries by population. how do they decide their anti-racism provisions if you live in a predominantly white community. what is the International Emergency information they have on hand. whatever the pursuit, it is done with impunity

No person has to talk, No records need to be provided. You want disclosure, a fair trial? Why the cost order includes everything you own?

TELL ME YOU DON’T LIKE YOUR CITIZENS, AND AREN’T ACCOUNTABLE TO THEM, WITHOUT TELLMING ME? OH YA PASSING THIS ACT.

WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS STAYS IN VEGAS

The COURTS CANNOT COMPEL A PERSON TO GIVE EVIDENCE OR PROVIDE RECORDS about what happens in ‘performance of duties under this act’. Well isn’t that also quite convenient. It’s a little Black Box with, this Act.

490 (1) Subject to subsection (2),

(a) a person must not give or be compelled to give evidence, in a court or in proceedings of a judicial nature, concerning knowledge gained in the exercise of powers or performance of duties under this Act, and

(b) records relating to the exercise of powers or performance of duties under this Act are not compellable in a court or in proceedings of a judicial nature.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to proceedings under this Act or a federal enactment.

(3) Despite subsection (1), if a board or health occupation director is of the opinion that disclosure of knowledge or a record referred to in subsection (1) would be in the public interest, the board or director may authorize the disclosure of the knowledge or record to a court or in proceedings of a judicial nature.

WHO’S IN CHARGE OF HEALTH CARE?

moving on to the NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THIS ACT. who decides what health care is;

THIS ACT not your doctors enables the decision of the ‘scope of health services that CAN BE PROVIDED.

491 (1) In this section, "health human resources management" includes making plans and taking actions to ensure the sufficient and appropriate distribution of providers of health services in British Columbia, including with respect to

(a) the timely provision of health services,

(b) the scope of health services that can be provided,

(c) the efficient and effective use of health human resources, and

(d) the demographic composition of persons who provide health services.

What? THE DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF PERSONS WHO PROVIDE HEALTH SERVICES. ok. we are once again entering into social engineering and virtue signaling by force.

It is now relevant to your health the demographic composition of individuals, of who is providing the ‘services’.

***Evidence of Discrimination must be monitored Anti-Discrimination measured Imposed

Do you get the sense that having a Christian belief system is not compatible with their ‘demographic requirement’. They get to hunt the identity of your: patients, your employees to ensure they are of the “right” composition. It doesn’t say what the demographic composition needs to be. Canadian isn’t it. That’s insufficient. And in fact, the presumption is that the demographics of your services need ‘tinkering’ with. Is it a question of competence? No it’s social engineering and presumption of discrimination by virtue of your hiring practice.

What is it: a constant Monitoring of Information for anti-discrimination measures. Remember anti-discrimination, is not free from discrimination. It is a new critical race theory concept that requires actual discrimination to affect: It makes you decide a ‘whole group’ are oppressors by virtue of their skin colour and a whole group are ‘oppressed’ by virtue of their skin colour. IRRESPECTIVE OF FACT.

Remember when we used to teach not to discriminate on the basis of skin, religion, or belief, or gender, but on the merits of the individual and the individuals themselves? Gone. Now your skin is the deciding factor of whether you are ‘wrong’ for the position. And religion in and of itself may be ‘wrong’.

Discrimination monitoring information

492 (1) The minister may, by order, require one or more boards or health occupation directors to provide to the minister statistical and other information, except personal information, that, in the opinion of the minister, is advisable for the purposes of monitoring for discrimination and evaluating anti-discrimination measures.

(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the minister may include in the order a requirement to provide one or both of the following:

(a) information respecting the demographic composition of regulated health practitioners, applicants to become regulated health practitioners, employees of regulated health practitioners and patients;

(b) information that is of a prescribed type.

PRIVACY VIOLATIONS

MOVING ON TO THE NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THIS ACT. May I introduce the end of privacy. That is, if you do not conform to their anti-racism hiring practices your information is published. Presumably for public shaming.

(What about your own skin colour what can you do with it, having been born into it. Are you part of the hiring totals that don’t match their numbers game?)

Do you even have control over who is applying for jobs in the area of town you practice, who needs health care at any point in time. And then do your clients want their demographic information, disclosed and handed over? Well no choice about it. THEY GET TO PUBLISH THE INFORMATION.

If information collection order made

493 (1) A board or health occupation director that is subject to an order made under section 491 [health human resources information] or 492 [discrimination monitoring information] must do all of the following:

(a) collect, directly or indirectly, the information the minister requires;

(b) assign a unique identification number to each person with respect to whom information is collected;

(c) provide the information to the minister in the form and manner, and on or before the date, required by the minister.

(2) A board or health occupation director may collect personal information in complying with an order referred to in subsection (1) but must not disclose to the minister information that could reasonably be expected to identify a person.

(3) The minister may do the following:

(a) use information provided to the minister under subsection (1) (c) for the purposes for which the information was collected and for the purposes of administering this Act;

(b) publish the information.

This Bill is a series of travesties, published in ink, passed in yeas, in a Canadian legislature. It is a weaponization of laws against the collective.

MONETARY PENALTY 497 ONTO THE NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THIS ACT. by putting political elements into the act, they get to hunt Conservatives, or Resistance within their purview and then ISSUE MASSIVE COSTS AWARDS AGAINST YOU.

SO a monetary penalty can be imposed, the costs of a hearing placed upon you. This can be the ‘punishment’, for a specious claim in and of itself. That is, whether or not you have done the thing claimed, the costs of the hearing can be the penalty.

497 (1) A registrar may issue a certificate stating the amount for which a debtor is liable under an order made against

(a) a licensee, former licensee or person referred to in section 5 (b) [application to former regulated health practitioners] for a monetary penalty, hearing costs or investigation expenses, or

(b) a health profession corporation, former health profession corporation or corporation that held a health profession corporation permit under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183, for

(i) a monetary penalty imposed under this Act or the Health Professions Act, or

(ii) a monetary penalty, hearing costs or investigation expenses, if section 275 (2) (b) [recovery of penalty, costs, expenses or refund] applies.

Effect of certificates IF IT’S ON THE CERTIFICATE IT’S PROOF OF FACT!!

ONTO THE NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THE ACT. fact IS NOT what is proven through evidence and cross examination, rules of civil procedure, disclosure, adequate representation, having a ‘known’ law ’ that you’ve violated. (because opinion is law in this regime)

NO, on top of this monkey scheme or kangaroo court, WHO WRITES THE CERTIFICATE DETERMINES THE FACTS. “Facts” are now defined by what ever they want to write on a certificate.

So then they insulate form judicial review and they say we have exclusive ownership over the facts (because we drafted the certificate) law and discretion. Nothing they do is compellable by courts as we have seen.

FACTS ARE DEFINED WITHOUT TRUTH

TELL ME YOU DON’T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THE PEOPLE IN BRITISH COLUBIA WITHOUT TELLING ME.

TELL ME YOU DON’T CARE ABOUT THE RULE OF LAW WITHOUT TELLING ME.

TELL ME YOU WANT TO CREATE A REGIME WHERE LAW AND JUSTICE IS IMMATERIAL WITHOUT TELLING ME.

TELL ME YOU WANT TO HAUL UP POLITICAL PRISONERS, SHAME THEM, JAIL THEM, VACCINE THEM, WIPE OUT THEIR PROPERTY, WITHOUT ANY REVIEW BY COURTS, WITHOUT TELLING ME.

TELL ME YOU SOLD OUT CANANDA DEMOCRACY ACCOUNTABILITY WITHOUT TELLING ME : OH YOU PASSED THIS ACT.

Yes I’m overly appalled. Appalled doesn’t quite get me there with the totality of this repressive regime. In this day and age you name the thing you want to pass the opposite of what it is and no one reads it and is that how it gets through? Or did sane individuals with callous aforethought and indifference to killing the Rule of Law, read and pass this. I want an foi on who drafted this.

AND NO REQUIREMENT TO GET A JUDGEMENT IN COURT. This violates normal civil procedure protections.

500 (1) Subject to the regulations, a certificate has the same force and effect, and proceedings may be taken on it, as if it were a judgment of the Supreme Court for the recovery of a debt in the amount stated against the debtor.

(2) A certificate is

(a) admissible in any proceedings to recover the certified debt without proof of the signature or official position of the person appearing to have signed the certificate, and

(b) proof of the certified facts.

Search and Seizure

MOVING ON TO THE NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THIS ACT; THE LOOTING OF YOUR BELONGINGS.

THIS PART IS PREMISE; AND you need a court order and would include your home. but then if the officer, in his opinion, thinks he doesn’t have time he can go in without a court order, then the search and seizure is without a court order.

His opinion is based on suspecting A FUTURE CRIME WILL OCCUR. Oh. right. the THOUGHT POLICE THINK YOU ARE THINKING OF THINKING SOMETHING PROHIBITED.

ITS going to be written up in a “FACT Certificate” anyways. Tell me you hate your country and the laws and our freedoms and the light that democracy is, and free people WITHOUT TELLING ME. oh you passed this act. Thank-you that’s how I know you HATE DEMOCRACY, accountability.

Search and seizure order

If you are doing any ‘no nos’ your premises can be searched and your property seized. Things will include electronics. Remember again how broad this act is. Remember you have an ‘occupation’ that it is in the ‘interest of public’ on the basis of an opinion, you are pulled in. Remember foreign laws you’ve never seen, are incorporated by reference. Remember they are watching even your hiring practices for anti-racism. Remember they can provide themselves new powers. Remember how horrid it is already. Remember the courts can’t compel anything. Remember fact, is not tested and proven, but written by somebody and could be fiction but is then in a ‘fact certificate’.

506 (1) If satisfied of a matter referred to in subsection (2), a judge may, by order, authorize a person to do one or more of the following:

(a) enter a premises at any reasonable time;

(b) search the premises and things found on the premises for things specified in the order;

(c) inspect, copy, analyze or take other actions specified in the order with respect to things found on the premises;

(d) on giving a receipt, seize and remove things specified in the order.

But what are the circumstances a Search and Seizure occur? You might not have done anything: ONLY THAT IT IS LIKELY YOU WILL IN THE FUTURE CONTRAVENE A PROVISION OF THE ACT BYLAW REGULATION OR ORDER. OR it is the opinion that you are ‘NOT FIT TO PRACTISE’ or have committed and ‘act of misconduct’. Can you see how this can be abused to harass on the basis of political issues;

Remember anti-racism etc. Demographic ‘compliance’. Having political social media opinions? How about a mistrust of government. Not healthy anymore. “Misconduct” DOES not seems to raise to the level of this type of intrusion.

(a) that a person has contravened, is contravening or will likely contravene

(i) a provision of this Act or of a regulation, bylaw or order, or

(ii) a term or condition of a licence or health profession corporation permit;

(b) that a licensee is not fit to practise or has committed an act of misconduct.

WARRANTLESS SEARCH

BASED ON “OPINION” oh. here we go again. Don’t want the judge’s order; The Person can do it.

A PERSON doesn’t need a judge’s order. NO. They can just go do the thing they want without the order. WHO IS THE PERSON? that get’s to search your home and take the things. and what is the threshold to do so? A reasonable BELIEF THAT THERE ARE GROUNDS FOR A SEARCH ORDER on the basis of things like ‘Misconduct’ and THEY BELIEVE you might destroy said ‘evidence’.

511 (1) A person who may make an application for a search and seizure order may, without first obtaining the order, do a thing described in subsection (2) if the person has reasonable grounds to believe that

(a) there are grounds for a search and seizure order, and

(b) the delay necessary to obtain the order would result in the loss or destruction of evidence.

AND WHAT DO UNAMED ‘PERSONS’ GET TO DO IN THE PREMISES WITHOUT A WARRANT issued by a judge? prevent you from entering your office or place that isn’t your personal residence search and seize things not listed in any warrant

(a) secure a premises, including preventing the lawful owner of the premises from entering the premises with or without accompaniment, until a search and seizure order may be obtained;

(b) enter a premises, other than premises occupied as a residence;

(c) search the premises and things found on the premises;

(d) seize things found on the premises that the person has reasonable grounds to believe are grounds for a search and seizure order.

how reasonable are the grounds when they can never truly be tested? Reasonable then becomes an element of trust. Trust the ‘person’ to enter my office and seize my ‘things found on the premises’, not that form the basis of a search and seizure order: no only that the person believes are ‘grounds for a search and seizure order’. Well there’s a hell of a subjective element with very little protection.

NOW IN CASE YOU BELIEVE THERE’S AN EXCESS OF JURISDICTION EXCERCISED BY

“THE PERSON”…. THE LEGISLATION PREVENTS JUDICIAL REVIEW. OH OK.

Tell me without telling me that YOU THINK FREEDOM IS DUMB that the PROTESTORS IN OTTAWA WERE FANATIC RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY NUTS. or that you want to make sure that’s the COVER STORY until ALL THE LAWS THAT WEAPONIZE THE LEGAL PROCEDURES AGAINST CITIZENS ARE IN PLACE, without telling me.

TELL ME YOU ARE EVIL TO THE CORE AND WANT TO ROUND UP CANADIANS THAT WOULD HAVE pre-2019 been considered Law Abiding. and redefine LAW to include POLITICAL TERROR WITHOUT TELLING ME.

oh ya YOU IN OFFICE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA passed this LEGISLATION.

Tell me without telling me that you ARE CHANGING CANADA FOREVER WITH A PUROPOSE TO ELIMINATE THE BEAUTY OF OUR CONSITUITON , SEPERATION OF POWERS, the Rule of Law -

This is A COUP A COUP A COUP. A coup on the dignity of humanity. This is set up for terror and impunity. But if you control the narrative, will it even be appreciated. Are we sleep walking into our own demise. when people say WAKE UP. they mean just that. WAKE up.

I did not draft this legislation. If what I am pointing out is inconvenient at all, this is not an issue of ‘the messenger’. This went through a Canadian Province’s legislature. They can’t all be asleep and incompetent. Some must have appreciated the power that was being awarded: to ‘regulate professionals’.

Professionals I might add, who up to this point in time, would have been presumed to be following the law. This grossesse is for a purpose. Don’t divine it is not. And don’t ignore the trends in your profession that mirror these.

I truly believe we have within this legislation the blue print. Wonder what the LSO is up to these days. I trust ‘Good Governance’ to safeguard it all for us.

So the militarized with an ‘AGENDA’ AND WE KNOW WHAT IT WILL BE: “Health Occupation Directors” AKA THE weaponized military police within this regime, and the internal hand appointed “DISCIPLINE PANELS’ AND “ THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS REVIEW BOARD’ they have final say on ‘FACT LAW AND DISCRETION” TO MAKE ANY ORDER under this Act (which is broad, and political) and is..

FINAL CONCLUSIVE NOT OPEN TO QUESTION OR REVIEW OF ANY COURT

LET THAT SINK IN.

you may not understand how it would pair with the WHO public health treaty or the new IHR amendments no one is talking about. So don’t think about that if its too ‘tinfoil for you’. Think about this Bill passed into law on its merits. Think about its operation. Even if you are in the far left pushing for many ‘advancements’ in policy. This wipes out not just your ‘right wing enemies’ it wipes out Canada as you know it. There’s no win even politically in this legislation.

And yes this legislation CAN BE USED A POLITICAL WITCH HUNT. AND yes this legislation can WORK HAND IN GLOVE WITH The WHO ‘MANDATES’ AND ‘HEALTH EMERGENCIES’ WHICH INCLUDE climate lock downs. I can’t believe the UN thinks pedophilia is now something for us to ‘decriminalize’. There are trends to notice within these legislations.

This legislation is MEANT to have one world view left standing in ‘health practice’.

IT IS CCP STYLE. don’t agree. don’t practice. don’t earn a living in anything related to health. and remember they need only think you have ‘sufficient education’ and you are ‘practicing in the area’, or ‘be in an ‘occupation’’ and it be in the ‘public interest’ to regulate you.

If you are in an union, you need to set up a parallel union that won’t actively elect people dismantling our country.

Judicial review

512 (1) This section applies to a health occupation director, the director of discipline, a discipline panel and the Health Professions Review Board.

(2) A person or body referred to in subsection (1) has exclusive jurisdiction

(a) to inquire into, hear and determine all those matters and questions of fact, law and discretion arising or required to be determined by the person or body under this Act, and

(b) to make any order authorized to be made by the person or body under this Act.

(3) A decision or order of a person or body referred to in subsection (1) on a matter with respect to which the person or body has exclusive jurisdiction is final and conclusive and not open to question or review in any court.

(4) Sections 57 and 58 of the Administrative Tribunals Act apply to a judicial review of a decision or order of a person or body referred to in subsection (1) of this section

THIS next section about False and Misleading Statements BRINGS EVERY CITIZEN INTO THE purview OF THIS ACT.

One thing I note, that as I read, I was constantly appalled. shocked even. But these are the words that are reflecting what I am also bearing witness, what you are bearing witness as our current reality. The march to a Stalin’s Russia is written in plain language. It is what we will do with it that matters. Do you think you understand what the ‘political’ battle lines are. I bet we don’t understand. I bet its a misnomer to even think its ‘right’ vs ‘left’. It is asleep at the switch or awake and twitching.

None of the current political understandings will be sufficient to overlay upon this, if this regime is left to stand and operate. The left vs right paradigm will be utilized to keep whatever capture is in power sufficiently long, to finalize the weaponization of this system of ‘law’.

On the basis of regulating ‘chiropractors’ for instance, this legislation grants itself carte blanche to operate without oversight of the law, the principles of justice, or the courts. The whole legislation must urgently be struck. But it also must be examined for what it is: a coup. a coup. a coup. I’m tolling the bell. All professional bodies: this is the Blue Print. Is there an excess? yes. Are you uncomfortable yes. But here is how they want it. They have a legislature that would do it for them. SHAME SHAME SHAME.

THIS ACT REGULATES A ‘PERSON’ ‘SHARING INFORMATION’ in contravention of the provisions of this act or regulations:

Offences

514 (1) A person who contravenes section 30 [unauthorized use of titles] or 34 [false or misleading information] commits an offence.

(2) A person who does any of the following commits an offence:

(a) knowingly discloses information in contravention of a provision of this Act or the regulations;

(b) knowingly provides false or misleading information to a person who is exercising a power or performing a duty under this Act, or a person acting under the order or direction of that person;

(c) wilfully interferes with or obstructs another person in the exercise of a power or performance of a duty under this Act or in carrying out an order made under this Act.

(3) A person who contravenes section 29 [unauthorized practice] commits an offence.

THINK ABOUT THIS: IT’S FALSE AND MISLDEADING if its in contravention of the ACT OR REGULATION.

Whether published in an independent peer reviewed publication. is AKA THE TRUTH. whether it is your actual experience or not. aka the truth. you many not share it with any person exercising a power or performing a duty under this Act. (is that on social media?)

LIMITATION DATE: 2YEARS AFTER IT COMES ‘TO THEIR KNOWLEDGE’. so the witch hunts can be deemed not to expire, based on when the HEALTH OCCUPATION DIRECTOR finds out: not ‘reasonably finds out’ .

517: every single time you posted ‘false or misleading’ information is an ‘offense’.

REMEMBER THIS IS FOR ‘FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION’ and you need only be a PERSON sending what they deem FALSE AND MISLEADING to anyone caught BROADLY UNDER THIS ACT.

The result is PRISON (2 YEARS) and 200K. This is your government using regulating ‘professional bodies’ to ‘regulate speech’ and enforce said regulation with time in Prison and egregious fines. Do you think anyone is captured at all? What speech is going to be eliminated? And the party the political party that wants to maintain free speech? will you be able to support it? or is that like having a tweet supporting Pierre Pollievre and having your regulatory body come after you.

Just how abusive can this be? how many mask studies did you post on twitter as a PERSON that was seen by someone broadly governed by this ACT. This is a mechanism to coral dissent and punish it. Seem about right in a democracy? Good Governance? or Govern me harder baby?

Penalties

518 (1) An individual who commits an offence listed in

(a) section 514 (1) [offences] is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $25 000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than 6 months, or to both,

(b) section 514 (2) is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $200 000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than 6 months, or to both, or

(c) section 514 (3) is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $200 000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than 2 years, or to both.

WHO SETS UP THE MISINFORMATION HEARINGS? YOU WERE DEEMED TO BE POSING AS A HEALTH YADA, by having and education and opinion? or doing an ‘occupation’

A COURT? NO. THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF BC. WILL THERE BE REGULAR CIVIL PROCEDURE PROTECTIONS NO.

how are facts proved? up to them? form and manner hearing? perfunctory? rubber stamp? settlement? could be up to them? do witnesses even have to attend? do witnesses have to be under oath NO!!! no THEY DON’T. AND THE REST CAN BE PROVIDED AS A ‘DISCRETION’ TO who is holding the hearing. OHHHH.

WHAT IS DEEMED FALSE AND MISLEADING had no relation to truth. and then witnesses don’t need to attend, or provide their evidence under oath. and REMEMBER NO JUDICIAL REVIEW. 200k STRAIGHT TO JAIL MAYBE THEY CALL IT MULTIPLE OFFENCES AND YOU a PERSON are shipped away. These are HEARINGS FOR FALSE SPEECH. I’m also having trouble knowing the limit of this jurisdiction in a social media world that has no borders. So you posted in Ontario and it was seen by someone governed by this Act? How does that work is this a long arm provision?

HEARINGS 521

521 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations respecting hearings conducted under Part 3 [Practice of Designated Health Professions], 4 [Practice of Designated Health Occupations] or 5 [Investigations and Discipline Generally], except a hearing conducted by a discipline panel or the director of discipline, as follows:

a) respecting the form and manner of hearings;

(b) respecting practices and procedures to be followed, including timelines in which processes and exchanges or submissions of records must be completed;

(c) respecting the conduct of negotiations or pre-hearing conferences for possible settlement of the issues before or during a hearing;

(d) respecting the means by which facts may be proved or the mode in which evidence may be given at pre-hearing conferences or in hearings;

(e) respecting the requirements for the attendance of witnesses, the conduct of witnesses or the compelling of witnesses to give evidence under oath or in some other manner;

(f) respecting processes that may be used to hold hearings, including conferring a discretion on persons who hold hearings to use any process that is appropriate in the circumstances.

REMEMBER THAT 200K. well it can be a lot more than that, it can be anything. it can wipe out your entire networth

Monetary penalties, costs and expenses

523 (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations respecting monetary penalties as follows:

(a) prescribing different amounts for different contraventions;

(b) prescribing a total maximum amount, if penalties are levied for more than one contravention;

(c) respecting the levying of monetary penalties for continuing contraventions;

(d) respecting circumstances in which monetary penalties must not be imposed.

you OR this REGIME want to apply to court to review a PUNITIVE ORDER? THE LG can modify even the Rules of the Supreme Court that would apply to your hearing. OH.

TELL ME WITHOUT TELLING ME THAT YOU DON’T THINK THE COURTS WOULD APPROVE IF THEY APPLIED THEIR STANDARDS. DON’T WORRY ELIMINATE THEIR RULES.

Applications to court

529 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations as follows:

(a) respecting the process for making an application to the court, including

(i) authorizing applications to be made electronically or by any other means,

(ii) respecting the giving of notice of an application, and

(iii) respecting affidavits or other evidence that must accompany an application;

(b) providing that the Supreme Court Civil Rules apply to the hearing of an application by the court, or modifying those rules;

(c) respecting certificates for the recovery of debts due under this Act and reviews of amounts owing.

ON TO THE NEXT WEAPONZIATION OF THIS ACT: PRIVACY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION.

Information

530 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations as follows:

(a) respecting the collection, use and disclosure of personal information, quality assurance information, protected information and other types of confidential information by regulators and regulated health practitioners, including

(i) authorizing the collection, use and disclosure of the information for purposes that are in addition to any referred to in this Act, and

(ii) conferring a discretion on a board or health occupation director to make bylaws or rules that impose prohibitions, requirements, limits and conditions that are in addition to any imposed under this Act or paragraph (b) of this section;

(b) without limiting paragraph (a), imposing prohibitions, requirements, limits and conditions on disclosing personal information, quality assurance information, protected information and other types of confidential information to

(i) the person who is the subject of the information,

(ii) other regulated health practitioners, for the purposes of providing health services,

(iii) regulators, for the purposes of monitoring the practice of a designated profession or occupation, and

(iv) provincial or federal government payment agencies and insurers that reimburse fees and expenses associated with health services, for the purposes of claims or payment administration and the performance of audits;

(c) respecting the collection, use and disclosure of information, including personal information, for the purposes of sections 491 [health human resources information] and 492 [discrimination monitoring information].

This provision allows the

This provision allows the LT to MAKE NEW RULES AND GRANT NEW POWERS AND COLLECT PERSONAL INFORMATION NOT CONTEMPLATED BY THE ACT. Really. Re-read the above. My work looking at the EU and Tehdas has ellucidated that the secondary use of health information is a new commodity. If you want that post let me know.

This again is a provision to grant powers in the future on personal information. From who. Well a person. And those covered by this act. That also seems exceptionally broad: for an act to regulate Professional Bodies.

And remember they insulate themselves from my court’s review. What will the regulations that the LT sees fit be? What will those new powers. It’s legislation to empower the executive branch?

ON TO THE NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THIS ACT; they get to pick and choose the beneficiaries, discretions and exemptions. WILL THE LAW APPLY UNIVERSALLY LIKE THE RULE OF LAW NO. they can ‘benefit their friends' or political allies or whomever based on an ability to have or provide ‘discretion’.

Classes, exemptions and discretion

532 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations as follows:

(a) establishing classes of persons, places or things referred to in this Act and making different regulations for different classes;

(b) exempting a person, place or thing, or a class of persons, places or things, from one or more requirements under this Act;

(c) conferring a discretion on the minister or the superintendent to, by order,

(i) exempt a person, place or thing from one or more requirements under this Act,

(ii) modify a requirement set under this Act with respect to a person, place or thing, or

(iii) set terms and conditions on an exemption or modification referred to in this paragraph.

ON TO THE NEXT WEAPONIZATION OF THIS ACT; IN BRINGS INTO EFFECT LAWS THAT HAVEN’T BEEN CRAFTED THAT ARE FOREIGN!!!!

TELL ME WITHOUT TELLING ME THAT YOU ARE COMPROMISED TO A WORLD AUTHORITY RATHER THAN THE DEMOCRACY THAT PURPORTED TO PLACE YOU IN OFFICE. YOU PASSED THIS ACT. No one. I repeat No one is accountable to their Nation State, will bring in laws not yet passed that are FOREIGN. WHAT THE AF? (SIC). I’d like to restrict my commentary to only ultra professional comments, but this monstrosity is passed in MY COUNTRY. With the appearance of a intact ‘democracy’; with the chilling knowledge that the WHO Pandemic Treaty and IHR Regulations are being passed without any fanfare or public debate. With the chilling knowledge that his and other legislation passed can work in lock step. that’s the tin foil hat part. But you don’t need to comprehend that part. You need to read the bill on its FACE. I didn’t draft it, or pass it. But someone did, and it all these provisions are ok with you, you’ve shifted a long long way from where you started. This is not left and right. This is what is going to be left that is right and good.

Incorporation by reference authorized

533 (1) A regulation of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, designation regulation, bylaw or rule made under this Act may adopt by reference, in whole or in part and with any changes the maker of the regulation, bylaw or rule considers appropriate, a regulation, code, standard or rule

(a) enacted as or under a law of another jurisdiction, including a foreign jurisdiction, or

(b) set by a provincial, national or international body or any other body that may make codes, standards or rules.

(2) A bylaw or rule made under this Act may adopt by reference, in whole or in part and with any changes the maker of the bylaw or rule considers appropriate, a model bylaw or model rule published by the superintendent.

(3) Unless otherwise stated, a regulation, code, standard, rule, model bylaw or model rule referred to in subsection (1) or (2) is adopted as amended from time to time.

THIS IS DESIGNED TO WORK WITH THE laws your democracy hasn’t seen or approved of! it incorporates the ‘LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION INCLUDING FOREIGN JURISDICTION’

This legislation is a COUP!! THIS LEGISLATION IS A COUP! ITS A COUP! IT’S A COUP D’ETAT!!

A COUP for political purposes ripe for abuse and insulated from the courts.

I CAN SEE THIS ONE ACT PASSED IN ONE PROVINCE WILL BE GIVEN AUTHORITY ACROSS CANADA THROUGH THIS LAST PROVISION. I CAN SEE OTHER LAWS YOU’VE NEVER SEEN INCORPORATED. IT SETS UP A JUSTICE ALONG SIDE OF THE COURTS THAT MEETS NONE OF THE CONSITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS. IT IS NOT LAW BUT WEAPONIZATION OF LAW FULL STOP.

I believe this is an egregious and very serious act that must not stand in CANADA.

It should be examined by lawyers everywhere as this is the FORMULA legislation on taking the Regulation of a Professional Body and WEAPONIZING THEM in terms of stripping out courts, civil procedures, politicizing requirements, making any person liable for kangaroo courts that lead to serious Jail time and fines that aren’t topped at 2years and not topped at 200k but at LT’s discretion for FALSE INFORMATION THAT they define.

Hearings on False and Misleading information have zero protections.

It is also a COUP LEGISLATION as it ‘incorporates' LAWS that aren’t even written from Foreign Jurisdiction’. This doesn’t even meet the basic concepts of incorporating Treaty law.

THIS NEEDS TO BE SHARED EVERYWHERE. ESPECIALLY TO CITIZENS OF BC, to lawyers considering their own law society right now.

If you want to encourage my work. Please consider a paid or free subscription and sharing.

WE ARE IN A RACE AGAINST TIME. TREAT INFORMATION AND ACTIONS AS YOU GETTING THE BATON. This is a race of millions. I’ve written this flawed and all in an impassioned way. I hope it reaches smarter more energetic lawyers, professionals and citizens than even I.

YOUR ENERGY, your legs, your intellect, your voice, your connections, whatever they are BRING IT. You absolutely must run with the Baton.

You, whoever you are, just got the baton. I’m trusting you.

I’m begging you with tears. I see the consequences of where we are headed. I hope I communicated this to you effectively. If I failed, or am imperfect, or you don’t like my writing or warning, treat it as my personal failing and do a better job bringing the warning and passing the baton.

YOU MUST RACE WITH IT. This is a race. I see it.

Brainstorm on how you will make an impact with this. THERE IS NO RULE OF LAW. That cannot stand.