7 Comments

NICOLAE CEAUSESCU WAS TRULY A PATRIOT!

Why was Ceausescu assassinated

Journalist Maria Diana Popescu December 30, 2013

Regarding the subject, this time I will certainly receive a warm invitation to go and meet my creators, but if everyone loved the truth, if some journalists in the country did not - he would have sold to the assassins, the truth would not have walked today in tatters and with a broken head. December does not even come into its own, because the media is twisting and turning it with the assassination of the Ceausescus. Regardless of what it was and how it was, the President of the Socialist Republic of Romania (for the younger ones, that was the official name of our country in 1989), Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife, Elena Ceausescu, were statesmen, and they were eliminated in style mobster, by shooting with Kalashnikov bursts, on the great Feast of St. Christmas, after a summary and crooked "judgment". After the barbaric and shameful execution, dictated on December 24, by telephone from Bucharest, by a group that included Brucan, Iliescu, Măgureanu, Roman, Voican, Militaru, Kemenici, who had the guarantee of their impunity, everything collapsed in Romania and today we have really become slaves in abject poverty. How much courage do Petre Roman and the rest of the assassins have when they state that "the bodies of the Ceauşti's and the film of the execution disappeared for several hours!" I think aliens stole them. The ex-president of Romania and his wife, Elena Ceauşescu, were not convicted by an official court. They were executed according to a paper, written and signed on December 23, 1989 by Ion Iliescu, on which date he had no official capacity in the management of the Romanian state, apart from that of head of the gang of "undercover profiteers" of revolutionaries, who were trying to annihilate the real revolutionaries, so as not to lose power. According to the saying "fear guards the garden", some time after the assassination of the two, for fear that it might be their turn, the executioners urgently moved to abolish capital punishment in Romania, and some left the country. The Ceauşti family were killed in cold blood, and those involved in the assassination of the presidential couple should be held accountable to the law. Now!

On the occasion of public speeches, President Nicolae Ceauşescu drew attention to the danger of imperialism, as it can lead to the loss of economic identity, national identity and even national independence. That's what happened after the coup. Research the documents, as I did, and then you will want to commemorate him. Nicolae Ceausescu's foreign policy was based on "non-interference in the internal affairs of other states". And because on the international level the former president acted and thought Romanian, he had to be removed and replaced by a puppet who thought and acted on a double channel: in favor of the great capitalist powers, but kept, through the red phone, the connection with Moscow. I quote the cynicism with which a platoon sergeant, named Dorin Cârlan, recounted the execution of Ceauşescu and his wife last year, on a central television station - "I made Elena Ceauşescu a stunner and took the polymers out of her head with brains, bones, and blood," shook me and led me to believe that the man had fouled spark plugs. Or he frowned after the crimes committed. Or he was specially chosen in the firing squad, because he was not of sound mind. This platoon leader had shot two people, committed two murders, not with one bullet, but with volleys, and was overflowing with childish enthusiasm on the screen, making it a public bravado. Those who committed the assassination and those who ordered it, following the judicial masquerade, have no excuse. Although they acted on external and internal orders and under the manipulations that governed the coup of 1989. It seems that we have a vocation to assassinate our patriots. History bears witness. Like Marshal Ion Antonescu, President Nicoale Ceauşescu shouted before the first bullet: "Long live free and independent Romania, death to the traitors!" Great care was taken, however, so that this part of the film (made up, falsified and rigged) broadcast to the point of intoxication, every year, before Christmas and which went around the world, should not reach the public, should be cut. In fact, an abominable political assassination, on the scale of history, a shame for us, the execution of the presidential couple Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu on December 25, on the Holy Feast of the Savior's Birth, is an anti-Christian assassination, and under this curse followed the involution of the people into freedom and the democracy long-dreamed of by the naive. The assassination of the Ceausescus was used as "a wonderful news" in the press of the time. All the newspapers headlined in lame letters: "Great news: the dictator has been caught and shot!" A gross manipulation! The criminals had replaced the wonderful news of the Nativity of Jesus, the celebration of the Romanian Christian, with the news of "minor crimes".

Expand full comment

Ceausescu was in the minds of Westerners. In fact, he was killed for u that he raised the Country from the stage of semi-feudalism to that of civilization. He had become extremely inconvenient to the powers of the West. Ceausescu offered Romanians a high-class education, in a free education, a guaranteed job, housing for every family or young person, free medical assistance (even if it was not up to today's European standards, when Romanians die in days). It offered human dignity and social protection. What did capitalism give Romanians? Poverty, unemployment, thievery, robbery, state corruption, ministers and parliamentarians in prison, drugs, ethnobotanicals, fraud, homosexuality, lesbianism, prostitution, slavery, discrimination, murder and a gun to the waist of all the bastards. Who suffered in the regime before '89? Stinkers, fools, whores and pickpockets. Of course, even then there were abuses, but they cannot be compared with today's. The last 24 years after the coup and the assassination of the presidential couple have been truly dramatic. The parents lived through a dictatorship with a socialist regime, not a communist one, as the ignorant and the ignorant say, who do not know what world they live in and what they eat History up to 1944 and even until 1964. In a dictatorship with a socialist regime, Ceausescu he built extremely many edifices, in order to have something for himself, which the capitalists close, sell and demolish. Four million apartments were built where half of the country's population moved, large factories and plants were built, where over ten million people worked, Transfăgărășan, the subway, the Danube-Black Sea Canal (which many long for , today), Casa Poporului, Sidex Galati, Oltchim, Petromidia, schools, kindergartens, hospitals, nurseries, which the capitalists were not even able to lime. In the 24 years since the coup d'état, Romania lost almost the entire industry, lost its sovereignty and economic independence. The generations of the present must learn that young families received jobs and apartments from the state, after graduating from college, students received an allowance, and education and health were free. Look now at the hundreds of thousands of children abandoned by their parents who have gone to work in the West, look at the factories of the unemployed, i.e. the universities that leave young people to chaotic freedom. Yes, theoretically, socialism is an unfriendly notion. But the many, the bottom of the country, were not struggling in poverty like today, when we are free to maintain the state budget defrauded by the governors and politicians, who have enriched themselves on the backs of the people. The control over the population is much more extensive today than in socialism, only that it is no longer achieved by force, but by subtle means: cards and credits, unconstitutional and abusive registration and exposure of the personal numerical code, control of public opinion (that is, also through fear). Romanians were forced to become consumers. They are given credit on their card, so that they can consume according to the needs of the West, as if Romanians no longer have their own will, but also to get them used to virtual money. Next come the ID cards with CIP and GPS detection included. Unlike the period before 1989, today you sit with the fear that you will end up unemployed, you are free as hell, just walk around, send your child to the private schools of the mobsters and for hard money, you are obliged to buy the illiterate textbooks from the system, otherwise the child's grade will be deducted. Yes, democratic "successes"! In socialism you didn't see people sleeping on the street, kicked out of their homes or jobs, you didn't see poor peasants. Ceausescu built a strong economy, as Romania did not have before the war, in order to be independent and not beg from the IMF, B.M. And so on

But, as a president, when you don't owe the world financial bodies, you are considered a dictator, you are invaded by jackals, your natural resources are taken away, and the people are turned into active taxpayers, (although they have no jobs, taxes are mandatory) slaves and consumer. Libya, Egypt, Syria, and Romania are living examples in this sense. They eliminated Ceausescu when the country had no more debts and the economy was doing well. Just when we had finished paying the debts and we were going to enjoy a European standard of living, for fear that we would compete with Western children, the aliens came and put their claws on the national assets. Even if in socialism, for a short period, you ate less, you were healthy, you lived without heat, electricity was given with the portion, even if the bread, sugar and oil were billed, that's how the external debts were paid. There were no millionaires and billionaires to defraud the state. Today there is plenty of food and bread (purchasing power being zero), but garnished with deadly egos, which spread diseases, obesity, cancer, diabetes, the degree of illness of the population being tripled.

Expand full comment

There have been more pickpockets, street children, more than community dogs, the press is full of scandals, crimes; cardboard billionaires have cthe doldora ontures, and they didn't give a day with a hoe. The law is made for them, they have luxurious cars and a gun on their waist. All these charming things were written into the coup plan of 1989. We deserve our fate. Live well!

So, I return to the question of a Romanian journalist from the central press. "Why didn't Ceauşescu build highways"? Simple: export to Russia and other countries was done by rail and water. The specialists of the time thought according to practical needs. No one walked in opinci during the socialist period, from now on we may walk barefoot. Opinca is ecological footwear and I'm afraid we won't be able to afford it. After 1989, how many kilometers of highway were built? Maybe the transport ministers or Bechtel answer? All the wealth of the country gathered with the sweat of the people was confiscated by the political and financial "elite", in cahoots with the world's financial bodies, by the sly guys, by the scumbags sneaking up on us and through the government, who give us so much that we don't die of hunger. I really don't understand where all the stupidity of some guild colleagues comes from to refer only negatively to what was during Ceausescu's time? Let us leave the past destroyed knowingly and in bad faith, and ask the incompetents who have accumulated huge fortunes, which they could not achieve in a millennium through honest work, why they indebted the country to the point of suffocation, why they robbed the country's wealth that they deposited in foreign banks, why does the country no longer have funds for investments, for salaries and pensions? If they keep complaining that there is no more money for investments, why don't they invest the money stolen from the people? Why are we still waiting for new foreign investors? They will never pursue the good of the country where they invest, but, of course, their own profit, as much as possible, which they will externalize, in foreign currency, not in lei. The lions leave them for local country sellers, who ensure their path to illicit gains. Those who governed after the coup d'état were not able to build anything in the country, except for offices to squeeze the last straw out of Romanians. All of them were put to the test. They looted the banks (Bancorex, Banca Agricola, Banca Religiilor, etc...), enterprises, factories, combines, impoverished the population through 300% inflation. Under the Iliescian lie in cohabitation with Petrică in the plover, called "privatization", Romania's production was gradually silenced. What could not be stolen, was sold to foreigners with majority or total capital for nothing, the price being below that of scrap metal, but for a fat bribe.

A former official of the Ministry of Economy from the old days, an economist by training, now retired, explained to me how before 1989 the performance of the economic balance and the 100% absorption of the young workforce was achieved, how Romania refused any contact with The IMF and other international financial bodies, which were trying to lure Romania into traps. "The trespassers had nothing to look for in the wheels of the system," he told me, "that's precisely why the economic system had no flaws or cracks. There were no favored classes. Many of the things before '89 - keeping the proportion of evolution over time - were superior to today's. Back then there were all kinds of bodies of honor and control, which solved people's problems, today you have no one to turn to, thieves pretend to be leaders." Recent studies show that at that time all the active population had a job, today approximately 6 million Romanians are looking for work outside the country. All Romanians had homes, today they are in debt to foreign banks for life, taken to the streets and forcibly executed. Back then the electricity was cut off daily, today we don't have the money to pay for it. Then there were a few hours of television a day, today, hundreds of TV stations bring into our homes violence, debauchery, political circus, crimes, debauchery, sexuality, pornography, homosexuality, which disturbs the minds of children and urges them to have sex from a young age, leading to anxieties, frustrations, suicides and internal conflicts with the self. What economy is the government talking about today? The industrial giants, which for decades in a row ensured the domestic production and exports of our country, were bombed.

There is no money for doctors' salaries, schools and hospitals are being abolished, health is in the hands of the pharmaceutical groups that condition the appointment of the management factors and the policy of the health institutions. "The socialist regime invested about 30% of GDP in research and development, military technology (tanks), aerospace (including supersonic planes), agriculture, infrastructure (railways, roads and bridges in villages, canals and irrigation systems, dams, sewers) ". So what did the "revolution" bring about, excuse me, the coup d'état?

Expand full comment

The freedom to go for strawberries, the freedom of slavery on Romanian soil and the contempt of the West. A country received as a gift in 1990, without a single leu of foreign debt and with enough cash (meaning liquidity B.R.C.E.), was t suffocated by debts for generations to come. Immediately after the coup, Petre Roman, prime minister at the time, announced that the country's industry is a pile of old beasts", a colossal lie, which started the robbery, still ongoing today.

So, why was Nicolae Ceausescu assassinated? Because he condemned the invasion of the U.S.S.R. in Czechoslovakia in 1968; because he built the House of the People, the second largest building in the world after the Pentagon; because Romania was the fourth arms exporter in Europe; because he built the subway in Bucharest, the Cernavodă Atomic Power Plant, the Danube-Maria Neagră canal; because in the spring of 1989 Romania had paid off all its external debts in the amount of over 18 billion dollars; because he had accumulated gold deposits in the National Bank (volatilized today and sent on a trip abroad); because he banned abortion and encouraged the birth rate, bringing the population to over 22,000,000, because he did not have accounts abroad as the neo-Bolsheviks claimed; because he built more than four million apartments; because the country's steel production was 8% of world production, and depending on this, Romania could change the price of steel on the stock market at any time; because he built over 10,000 schools, universities and kindergartens, almost 100 hydropower plants; because Romania had one of the most developed railway networks in Europe; because, starting from 1973, Nicolae Ceauşescu allowed the establishment of 48 joint-stock companies, with participation of Western capital in the country and abroad, and the volume of trade with the West almost doubled: from 28% in 1965 to 45% in 1974 ; because between the years 1971-75, Romania registered an annual growth rate of 11.8%, a figure never equaled in Europe. For all this and for the guilt of not being an occasional patriot, but a real one, Ceausescu was assassinated in cold blood, in a frantic rush, on Christmas Day. If you try to talk about Ceausescu today, you are immediately categorized as a communist or nostalgic. In my case, I cannot be accused either of participating in the system or of communist nostalgia. During the time of Nicolae Ceauşescu's assassins, who in the meantime became billionaires with the help of the Americans, I took care of the baby bottle. Study the archive documents and you will see what Ceausescu did with the money from the IMF. and from the World Bank, and what did these fat democrats, specialized in financial scams, do at the political summer schools of the parties.

Study the documents! The president shot by the few anti-Romanians, indoctrinated by "foreign agents" will no longer seem so sinister to you. Ceausescu was truly a patriot. Apart from the scumbags who plundered the Romanian state after 1989 and became scumbags, today the people lie in poverty, ruthlessly exploited, for almost a quarter of a century. The Tîrgovişte wall is too small for these packs of politicians who have undermined and ruined post-December Romania!

https://www.art-emis.ro/editoriale/de-ce-a-fost-asasinat-ceausescu

Expand full comment

That was an interesting history lesson Lisa thank you I learned much! The problem is the governments of the west have been corrupted from within and taken over from within and once again it is only the minority of the people who can see it for what it is, Communism trying to take hold of the west.

Too many are either indoctrinated or brainwashed and most leaders of the churches including the pope himself are in on it just like every other institution we used to believe in. We are living in a pathocracy, with impotent leaders and their useful idiots and with every institute and large corporations especially with the assistance of the mainstream media censorship following along with the globalist agenda.

Things are getting worse, what does it take to get people to wake up if they’re not already bothered by mass censorship, constant surveillance with lots more plans coming down the pike to disappear autonomy altogether and aerial spraying of toxins across our skies in attempts to block out the sun?They don’t feel threatened enough yet it seems or mostly only in an economic sense.

Expand full comment

Speaking of communism.... Canada style......

'Whore of Havana' The Justin Trudeau Story (Premiere)

Premiere of 'Whore of Havana' The Justin Trudeau Story

A Film by Dean Ryan

Exploring the checkered past of Canada's notorious Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his deep rooted connection to Fidel Castro.

https://rumble.com/v4x8c1f-whore-of-havana-the-justin-trudeau-story-film.html

Expand full comment

I am currently reading a story of the Chinese Communist Revoution, in the form of autobiography (The Vermillion Gate, by Aiping Mu). Her parents lived through the earlier part of it, she, as a child lived through the later part of it. There are two things very scary about it. One is that 1984 already happened, only without the hi-tech two way TV screens. The other is that there are so many close parallels between the early stages of all that (1930's and early 40s) and now.

Expand full comment