The injecting practitioner is obliged to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination, or a person may choose to decline the intervention.
So how did practitioners go along with coercion and mandates?
Practitioners should have refused to inject people they knew were under duress to comply.
How did this happen? Why did practitioners collaborate with coercion and mandates?
And why didn’t the law profession step up and highlight that practitioners who injected people who were being pressured, coerced, manipulated and even mandated to submit to the injections were trashing voluntary informed consent?
This just pisses me off. One of our Australian ex pollies worked for the oecd in this time and today I read in the newspaper his wife is running for preselection in our state election. We will never be rid of these wankers. They are idiots. They did get people trusting them with their oh so polite messaging then, but now nobody with a brain trusts any alphabet, NGO or government.
And that is how all the immigrants from former communist countries tell me they felt from the start of covid. It was a stark line for them. We are already in soft communism.
The deadline (January 27, 2024) to submit proposed amendments has passed. It is the responsibility of every sovereign member nation of the WHO to defend the rule of law and enforce Article 55. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/enforcearticle55
SHARE as if your life depends on this because it DOES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We citizens need to pay more attention to executive orders. (In the US, I would guess other 'democratic' countries have their own version) They are designed to gradually skirt the law. All presidents do it, they may not realize that they are helping to move things along. When a drug is authorized under an EUA, there is no requirement to obtain informed consent, they only need to inform you that the drug is under EUA and you have the right to refuse it. (Unfortunately this wasn't even done). Check Katharine Watt's substack, she has done extensive research into this. As to why the healthcare workers do it, somehow they bought into the lie. All doctors and nurses had to take some sort of biology course and they know that a virus can get through any mask and the dark, warm, moist conditions inside the mask are an excellent environment for the bacteria that we normally exhale yet you see them all cheerily going about their day with a mask plastered on their face. (Somehow infection control procedures have been relaxed for the most dangerous viruses ever but that's another discussion). I'm sure there was some kind of campaign to brainwash healthcare workers, (I'd like to see the correspondence on that.) Some of them are just bad people like society as a whole, but most of them have just bought into the myth that the science is sound, listen to the 'experts' they know best. Thanks to the prep act, they can't be sued and when that happens you take away the motivation for the people at the top to care what is being done to the patients. To make matters worse, CMS went on record and relaxed patient rights, so families were kept out. The patients had nobody to advocate for them. As far as having another Nuremberg type trial, who would be in charge? Tedros and the WHO? I'm sure those in charge already have it all planned out. But we mustn't accept defeat, dont comply, don't make things easy for them
What happened to ‘voluntary informed consent’?
The injecting practitioner is obliged to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination, or a person may choose to decline the intervention.
So how did practitioners go along with coercion and mandates?
Practitioners should have refused to inject people they knew were under duress to comply.
How did this happen? Why did practitioners collaborate with coercion and mandates?
And why didn’t the law profession step up and highlight that practitioners who injected people who were being pressured, coerced, manipulated and even mandated to submit to the injections were trashing voluntary informed consent?
All of medicine is becoming technocratic. Doctor speaking up lose their license. They have to move as a block. Reclaim their power.
This just pisses me off. One of our Australian ex pollies worked for the oecd in this time and today I read in the newspaper his wife is running for preselection in our state election. We will never be rid of these wankers. They are idiots. They did get people trusting them with their oh so polite messaging then, but now nobody with a brain trusts any alphabet, NGO or government.
And that is how all the immigrants from former communist countries tell me they felt from the start of covid. It was a stark line for them. We are already in soft communism.
1. Censorship
2. Agree or lose your job
3. Dei
Etc.
***********************************#EnforceArticle55**************************************************
The deadline (January 27, 2024) to submit proposed amendments has passed. It is the responsibility of every sovereign member nation of the WHO to defend the rule of law and enforce Article 55. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/enforcearticle55
SHARE as if your life depends on this because it DOES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We citizens need to pay more attention to executive orders. (In the US, I would guess other 'democratic' countries have their own version) They are designed to gradually skirt the law. All presidents do it, they may not realize that they are helping to move things along. When a drug is authorized under an EUA, there is no requirement to obtain informed consent, they only need to inform you that the drug is under EUA and you have the right to refuse it. (Unfortunately this wasn't even done). Check Katharine Watt's substack, she has done extensive research into this. As to why the healthcare workers do it, somehow they bought into the lie. All doctors and nurses had to take some sort of biology course and they know that a virus can get through any mask and the dark, warm, moist conditions inside the mask are an excellent environment for the bacteria that we normally exhale yet you see them all cheerily going about their day with a mask plastered on their face. (Somehow infection control procedures have been relaxed for the most dangerous viruses ever but that's another discussion). I'm sure there was some kind of campaign to brainwash healthcare workers, (I'd like to see the correspondence on that.) Some of them are just bad people like society as a whole, but most of them have just bought into the myth that the science is sound, listen to the 'experts' they know best. Thanks to the prep act, they can't be sued and when that happens you take away the motivation for the people at the top to care what is being done to the patients. To make matters worse, CMS went on record and relaxed patient rights, so families were kept out. The patients had nobody to advocate for them. As far as having another Nuremberg type trial, who would be in charge? Tedros and the WHO? I'm sure those in charge already have it all planned out. But we mustn't accept defeat, dont comply, don't make things easy for them