WORLD POPULATION PLAN OF ACTION
No one is concerned with reducing fertility. Not the UN since 1974
The link above is a UN link still active. But I downloaded the document below.
According to this article Dep State Bull. 1974 Sep:1-14.
World Population Plan of Action from the United Nations World Population Conference, Bucharest, August 19-30, 1974
No authors listed
PMID: 12229766 found HERE:
the plan can be distilled as follows:
“The Plan 1) encourages nations to develop population policies; 2) recognizes the right of individual governments to determine their own population policies; 3) calls on countries to make a concentrated effort to reduce mortality and infant mortality; 4) upholds the right of all couples to determine the number of children they want to have; 5) calls upon governments to make family planning education and services available for all individuals; 6) calls for the integration of family planning services and other health services; 7) recommends reducing urban pressure by promoting regional and rural development policies; development programs; 8) urges governments to improve popu collection procedures in their respective countries in order to facilitate population and development planning; 9) advises governments to take into account the age and sex structure of the population in formulating development plans; and 10) asks governments to promote legal, educational, and employment equality for women. The Plan places a high priority on conducting population research and research aimed at developing more effective contraceptive methods. The successful implementation of the plan depends primarily on the actions taken by individual countries; however, international efforts should support and promote these national efforts.”
So well the Reduce the population being a conspiracy is now fact and has been for some time. Those who silence us with the use of conspiracy theory allegations, very quickly get to, reasons behind the need for the culling. The finite resources.
They forget grade 5 carbon cycle and the cyclical nature of the resources they are afraid of expiring. Minerals do not expire. Elements other than radioactive ones, don’t expire. Carbon is refashioned from detritus to fossil fuels to CO2 to plants through photosynthesis. Carbon does not expire. All the data on the greening of the deserts show that CO2 increases photosynthesis.
IT’S A CYCLE NUMBSKULLS!
Carbon Cycle Definition as found on byJus
Carbon cycle is the process where carbon compounds are interchanged among the biosphere, geosphere, pedosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere of the earth.
Carbon Cycle Steps
Following are the major steps involved in the process of the carbon cycle:
Carbon present in the atmosphere is absorbed by plants for photosynthesis.
These plants are then consumed by animals and carbon gets bioaccumulated into their bodies.
These animals and plants eventually die, and upon decomposing, carbon is released back into the atmosphere.
Some of the carbon that is not released back into the atmosphere eventually become fossil fuels.
These fossil fuels are then used for man-made activities, which pump more carbon back into the atmosphere.
Population will decay and become fossil fuels through the carbon cycle. Much better than soylent green through the globalist version of the carbon prison cycle.
This is straight from the UN Population Plan. It is a lengthy document worth understanding. It is based on a flawed version of organic and inorganic chemistry. The ice ages kill species faster then warming periods. It is a just a self hating anti-human plan.
"Throughout history the rate of growth of world population averaged only slightly above replacement levels. The recent increase in the growth rate began mainly as a result of the decline in mortality during the past few centuries, a decline that has accelerated significantly during recent decades.
The inertia of social structures and the insufficiency of economic progress, especially when these exist in the absence of profound socio-cultural changes, partly explain why in the majority of developing countries the decline in mortality has not been accompanied by a parallel decline in fertility.
Since about 1950, the world population growth rate has risen to 2 per cent a year. If sustained, this will result in a doubling of the worlds population every 35 years. However, national rates of natural growth range widely, from a negative rate to well over 3 per cent a year. 4.
The consideration of population problems cannot be reduced to the analysis of population trends only. It must also be borne in mind that the present situation of the developing countries originates in the unequal processes of socio-economic development which have divided peoples since the beginning of the modern era. This inequity still exists and is intensified by lack of equity in international economic relations with consequent disparity in World Population Plan of Action http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html 4/46 levels of living. 5. Although acceleration in the rate of growth of the world's population is mainly the result of very large declines in the mortality of developing countries, those declines have been unevenly distributed. Thus, at present, average expectation of life at birth is 63 years in Latin America, 57 years in Asia and only a little over 46 years in Africa, compared with more than 71 years in the developed regions. Furthermore, although on average less than one in 40 children dies before reaching the age of 1 year in the developed regions, 1 in 15 dies before reaching that age in Latin America, 1 in 10 in Asia and 1 in 7 in Africa. In fact, in some developing regions, and particularly in African countries, average expectation of life at birth is estimated to be less than 40 years and 1 in 4 children dies before the age of 1 year. Consequently, many developing countries consider reduction of mortality, and particularly reduction of infant mortality, to be one of the most important and urgent goals. 6. While the right of couples to have the number of children they desire is accepted in a number of international instruments, many couples in the world are unable to exercise that right effectively. In many parts of the world, poor economic conditions, social norms, inadequate knowledge of effective methods of family regulation and the unavailability of contraceptive services result in a situation in which couples have more children than they desire or feel they can properly care for. In certain countries, on the other hand, because of economic or biological factors, problems of involuntary sterility and of subfecundity exist, with the result that many couples have fewer children than they desire. Of course, the degree of urgency attached to dealing with each of these two situations depends upon the prevailing conditions within the country in question. World Population Plan of Action”
http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html 5/46 country in question. 7. Individual reproductive behaviour and the needs and aspirations of society should be reconciled. In many developing countries, and particularly in the large countries of Asia, the desire of couples to achieve large families is believed to result in excessive national population growth rates and Governments are explicitly attempting to reduce those rates by implementing specific policy measures. On the other hand, some countries are attempting to increase desired family size, if only slightly. “
Please review the World Population Plan and have on hand for the hurling of conspiracy theorist. The UNs link is active.
Please refer to the carbon cycle. whether the apex predator is us or wolves, the detritus we become will release carbon eventually. Unless they want to send the carbon into space to prevent CO2 for the ultimate nonsense solution to the non-problem.
If they want to interrupt the carbon cycle because of carbon it tends to get nauseating. Thanks always for reading considering, agreeing or not, sharing and being patient with me! Be good to yourself and others. How long our time is not measured in always agreeing. Some of my best times have been in lively debates. don’t we want to exert our minds? Don’t we want to have the ability to spar intellectually? Don’t we want the opportunity to persuade? Or MUST WE ALWAYS AGREE OR DIE. Diversity equity and inclusion is coming for you. Unless we get it first.
what an acronym. I always thought it meant die freedom. die carbon also fits. die those who defy them also fits. Die population ? that might be a wee streeeetch.
Here I am still standing. I love Boatrawker‘s parodies. Some are funny. But get this. It is still a wonderful world. Ice ages would be worst than globalists I figure. We have to explain it them so they see the vision of their world and prefer ours.
Someday the technocrats might wish for an Ice age than the consequences the FREEDOM FIGHTS have for them. Write down what you want on a list. put it in a vision and the glint of your eyes. How many of us doing this. FOC-us.
I am seriously wondering if the evils of WW2 go away? It looks like they unfortunately hide in plain sight.
The Moving Contradiction
it's not Malthus after all...
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/the-moving-contradiction