UNESCO GUIDELINES FOR THE GOVERNANCE OF DIGITAL PLATFORM. THE SHUT UP POLICE. WHERE Speech needs policing and law and order is irrelevant.

Hate and misinformation is morphing to include discussions about Climate

New automobiles will require your biometrics, your face to drive. Presumably they could be outfitted for shutting down based on speech and misinformation violations. Great technology if you want your Big Brother Schwaab with you at all times.

Bring out your dead! thoughts and speech that is.

Citizen Go has written a great essay on the status of the latest fancy thought police in the market place. THE TREND IS HARD to avoid if you are looking at it all. It is the bzzt, can’t say this. MC Hammer has to do a redo of Can’t Touch this. as Can’t Say This.

It’s the Inquisition equivalent of cutting out the tongues of blasphemers. In Canada Bill 36 has weaponized the Regulatory Body to do the same thing:

1. Provided committees who can give themselves powers on an as needed basis;

2. Legislated International Instruments not yet passed. so the black box of legislation;

3. Given themselves under the auspices of communication with a regulated professional the ability to regulate those who communicate with a regulated professional. So like hey doctor did you see this peer reviewed article published about .. myocarditis?

4. Aggressive search and seizure laws including where they think you will delete ‘misinformation’, the ability to go in without warrant.

5. criminal penalties and fines;

6. Essentially provided long arm jurisdiction where you govern people based on the speech. That could come from anywhere. Like a Jordan Peterson twilight zone episode where complainants come from anywhere in the Globe, based on their subjective interpretation to his speech. (The Court of Appeal ruled against him this week, or rather failed to allow leave to appeal. )

My theory on all these Professional bodies that silence their members, is that they are woven together and by 2025 will be more important than courts if we do not push back. I do not see the judges tempering the professional committees policing speech. I see the only possible result for freedom being the dissolution of these bodies. SIC. Once infected in their structure by hard line adherents to neo-marxist totalitarianism there is no possible of a cleanse. Look at their budgets and administration and new focus on cleansing the profession of thought. Precursor organization to worse still.

When you see how thorough all the little bubbles are you see they all link, through all OECD countries and beyond. It is the tongue tamer. To earn a living you will have to comply. The regulatory bodies are organizing everything. Next in line are the recruiters. So you get docked for failures in DEI and you have these committees, all the same, all without any court supervision, so denuded of constitutional rights, bill of rights, and charter rights. IT is a mind numbingly boring way to assemble power through bureaucrats but this is what is happening. It is also no stone unturned. Any Professional of any stripe, nutritionist to real estate agent, should read Bill 36 to understand that is the beast they codified and how they wish it to operate.

That Bill has to come thunderously down. And then all the committees on speech in every professional body and failing that the bodies themselves.

When I see them attacking the doctors, the politician in Findland, Jordan Peterson, it is all the same dance. You can guess where it ends.

Citizen Go on Unesco : "UNESCO, a major UN agency, slyly launched an alarming plan – one that strikes at the very heart of our freedoms.

The plan, called ‘Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms,’ outlines a 'set of duties, responsibilities, and roles for States, digital platforms, intergovernmental organizations, civil society, media’, etc., to deal with 'dis- and misinformation, hate speech, and conspiracy theories.'

This is a direct attack on free speech, targeting those of us who challenge the Globalists’ views on gender, abortion, vaccinations, family values, and Christianity.

The same UN that pushes for a global pandemic accord to control your health decisions or that upholds that religious freedom is less important than the promotion of LGBT ideology - they will now be deciding what you can or can’t read, post, and share!

Will you sign the petition today urging Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to stand against UNESCO's plan of global censorship?

At CitizenGO, we're ready to stand up against this globalist and far-left conspiracy, just like we're fighting the Pandemic Treaty and other threats to your freedom and mine. Step one in our plan:

Let's rally together to amass over 500,000 signatures from Canada and across the 20 countries where we operate by January 31st. We want to generate a massive response in the shortest time and present an overwhelming opposition, ensuring the decision-makers don't forget the strong resistance to their under-the-radar plans.

The ability to freely exchange ideas and information is a cornerstone of democratic societies. 

Yet the report seeks to restrict open discourse on social media platforms and beyond under the guise of controlling the so-called “hate speech” and “false information”. 

But you and I know the real deal: to these Globalists, "hate speech" and "fake news" are just what goes against their agenda… And that’s why they need a global thought police.

Their intentions are clear:

• If information surrounding elections is suppressed and under their control and regulation, then we know just how easily it is for them to influence and affect political outcomes.
  
  

• Second - public health measures - are you surprised? After a year fighting off the WHO Pandemic Treaty, the UN is now getting its hands on yet another weapon to dictate your health choices.
  
  

• And last but not least … “incitement to discrimination”, also known as “hate speech”... In other words, anything that goes against their agenda in topics like gender ideology, abortion, and Christian opinions in such matters!

You will recall how a number of our own campaigners at CitizenGO –like Caroline Farrow in England, Ann Kioko in Nigeria, and now Eduard Prols in Germany– have been prosecuted and charged for publicly expressing their opinions on issues like gender ideology. 

Not to mention the outrageous prosecution of legislator Päivi Räsäanen in Finland, who faced a lengthy three-year trial, risking jail time, for expressing her Christian views online.

And so many others like her in the last few years!

Don’t forget, all of the above were prosecuted and faced charges for “hate speech”.

The aim of this new report is to propose measures to identify and limit what it considers "disinformation” and “hate speech”. 

Once again, it is up to us to get in the way of this and do everything possible to expose it for what it is - a totalitarian, overreaching attempt at global censorship, that directly restricts our fundamental rights to express our beliefs.”

Citizen Go references

References:

Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms (UNESCO)
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387339

Inside the UN Plan to Control Speech Online (The Epoch Times)
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/inside-the-un-plan-to-control-speech-online-5534524

Inside The UN Plan To Control Speech Online (AMAC)
https://amac.us/newsline/society/inside-the-un-plan-to-control-speech-online/

Whether it is silencing Christian Muslim or Jewish or other religious voices it is the same premise.

But just like I’ve always thought, it may start with attacking Christians but there is no actual line in the sand. They come for science that they don’t want us to have either.

So atheist, and agnostics, it is way more than that. It is also the definition of Hate speech, as Climate denialism. We are talking about a monolithium of gigantic proportion. And it is just what will be required to quell dissent.

the ‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘Academics’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ (you can never have enough quotation marks for the dribble out there passing as study, research and academia) are pushing for climate denialism to be HATE SPEECH.

So you accept John Kerry up your wazoo or bust.

Here is an excerpt of Igor’s post, link below.

Freedom is a 'Threat to Our Democracy'

“The proposed solution is to stop platforming climate denial. The definition of climate denial is ever-changing and constantly expanding.

Even content agreeing with global warming but questioning specific climate solutions is now considered harmful misinformation. Imran Ahmed from CCDH explains:

In this report, for the first time, researchers at the Center for Countering Digital Hate have quantified the startling and important rise over the past five years in what we call “New Denial” — the departure from rejection of anthropogenic climate change, to attacks on climate science and scientists, and rhetoric seeking to undermine confidence in solutions to climate change. “New Denial” claims now constitute 70% of all climate denial claims made on YouTube, up from 35% six years ago.”