They want to Imprison Dissenters
They want to Imprison Dissenters
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
The Online Harms Bill would Jail Dissenters in the UK. We don’t need to be safe from being ‘hesitant’ on a vaccine (that doesn’t stop transmission). We need to be safe from GOVERNMENTS USING SPEECH TO JAIL CITIZENS. WHAT KIND OF WESTERN GOVERNMENT DOES THIS. DIDN’T WE ‘WAGE WARS’ TO ENSURE DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM BEFORE.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
They want to Imprison Dissenters.
I woke up astonished that this sentence kept repeating in my brain. Because they want to Imprison Dissenters. Those who want to contribute to the discussion in a manner that doesn’t parrot the government..
SPEECH IS SO DANGEROUS TO THEIR PLANS, THAT IT LANDS YOU IN JAIL. BILL 36 JAILS YOU FOR ‘MISINFORMATION’ IN CANADA. FROM BC BUT HAS LONG ARM JURISDICTION.
THIS DOESN’T HELP ONE SINGLE MEMBER OF OUR SOCIETY. REGARDLESS OF YOUR PERSONAL JOURNEY AND WHERE YOU ARE HEADED AND HOW FAST. JAILING THOSE WHO SPEAK…. AGAINST THEIR GOVERNMENT?
HOW IS THAT ETHICAL. YOU GO OUTSIDE. YOU LOOK AROUND. LOOKS LIKE CANADA. LOOKS LIKE CANADIANS. BUT THEY ARE PASSING BILLS THAT WANT TO JAIL DISSENTERS.
One piece of legislation has already passed in Canada Bill 36 in BC with long arm jurisdiction.
Bill C6 would imprison parents and professionals ‘converting’ their child to their original birth gender (not affirming? or seeking therapy that explores this non-affirming option). This Bill has passed the house and is at the final reading in the senate
Bill C-6: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy)
It is described thus: “The Bill would discourage and denounce harmful practices and treatments that are based on myths and stereotypes about LGBTQ2 people. These include myths and stereotypes that the sexual orientation or gender identity of LGBTQ2 people are undesirable and temporary conditions that can and should be changed.”
DAMN I want to get rid of things that hurt this community too. So Its all in the presentation. You win by naming it something that makes sense and bury the horror in the meat and pOtatoes. This is an act to AMEND THE CRIMINAL CODE. THE CRMININAL CODE. the criminal code. WHO ARE THE CRIMINALS? the parents and therapists in dissent.
Is it a really big cake or is someone in it?
Is the child completely and ALWAYS served with zero dissent? Where is that the case anywhere? Totalitarian systems that lead sterilizing and a life time a medicalization AND questioners therapists parents be dammed.
ONLY the affirmers stay out of JAIL. WHAT?????? WHAT?????? who then protects the child when the decision is hasty, influenced or ill-advised. who presents the life time of medicalization or consequences of sterilization, little appreciated between 12 and 18?
only AFFIRMERS STAY OUT OF JAIL. tell me its a system that is lopsided? only treatments that AFFIRM are permitted if you want to avoid Jail. ONLY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS WHO TOE THIS LINE STAY OUT OF JAIL. ONLY PARENTS WHO AFFIRM STAY OUT OF JAIL. who then provides true informed consent.
Seems like a battering ram to ensure entry into the system of medicalization and sterilization. WHEREAS what other medical procedure cannot be sustain challenge and how else do we ensure the heavy consequences of regret will not befall a child? This is not merely ensuring equal rights and use of pronouns this eliminates dissent from questioning procedures that lead to genital removal and sterilization. Where have we seen that in history before? And these are children. Pfft.
How do you explore options that delay the decision to be certain. Detransitionners increasingly are voicing their concerns, or indicate they were let down by the system (that didn’t jail dissenters). Protection of children may involve insuring all voices are heard.
Who cannot see the process and system may have flaws. And not just flaws like pot holes in a road, but missing genetalia and reproductive organs for an entirety of their lives. Is that ever something we should fast walk without dissent? And being loving and affirming is only one aspect of child protection. It is not discrimination it is principles of truly informed consent.
The proceed with caution and eliminate dissent with the threat or actual prison? I’m not sure that is a ‘system’ that affirms so much as a totalitarian system to eliminate the protections of the child that say ‘other’ than what the system is set up to ‘say’ and ‘do’. Are all children finding their right and proper path at all times Any detransition story seems to reinforce that alternatives were not presented. I studied conflicts of interest and a system where professionals are all paid and all affirm and some only get paid where they perform surgeries and dissenting medical or parental opinions are silenced on pain of prison? Well seems like that ab initio is ripe for systematic HARM. If jailing one innocent person in criminal law requires Constitutional Protection?
Well it would be better if everyone who needed to feel good felt good about the body they were born in and I understand that doesn’t happen.
But nobody’s body feels good in jail. And no-one who regrets sterilization or the medicalization of their body, feels good either.
So that’s alot of GOVERNMENT CONTROL to ensure all the way to surgery and hormones at very young ages are paved without dissent. Remember adults can choose all kinds of interventions up to including a therapist who wants to explore other options then ‘affirmation’. Its the child who won’t have access to this or adults who would recommend this.
Is it a really big horse? Or is an army in it?
Image from aleteia.org
