THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY
The Great Barrington Declaration of Climate Alarmism:
I did a stack on the incoming climate lock downs through IHR amendments and the COP27 conference.
There is another perspective that doesn’t require you in chains. Please spread the word. The Great Barrington Declaration now has its climate counterpart.
There is No Climate Emergency
Because the climate alarmists are tying health to climate to justify lockdowns; these are the other areas of specialists that need to weigh in. It is not just whether the weather is man made but:
climate health not the most serious health concern;
lockdowns won’t alleviate climate health;
consumptive based interventions are punitive and result in a new political system;
smart city is not health city but prison city
starvation by the c40 leeds arup plan (chapter 6) will cause worst health outcomes;
What would it take to improve goods and services in ways that help us keep global heating below 1.5°C and avoid even more debilitating storms, heat waves and droughts than we’ve seen lately? And how might those changes affect quality of life?
That’s what we set out to answer in 2019, in an area of work that was very new to us then, just as it was for many important stakeholders, from governments to businesses and beyond. The result is a report C40 published with Arup and the University of Leeds, entitled: “The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World.”
communist prison systems are not conducive to health outcomes see ;
reducing greenhouse emissions in agriculture industry results in starvation;
forest fires have been arson;
weather science is quite developed and can be weaponized;
it has become an outcome based science for power accumulation;
the number of professionals who should be properly weighing in are not just those that understand climate or geology or modelling but so so many more.
“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.
To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.
There is no climate emergency
A global network of over 1609 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming
The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted
The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters
There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment.
Epilogue
The World Climate Declaration (WCD) has brought a large variety of competent scientists together from all over the world*. The considerable knowledge and experience of this group is indispensable in reaching a balanced, dispassionate and competent view of climate change.
From now onward the group is going to function as “Global Climate Intelligence Group”. The CLINTEL Group will give solicited and unsolicited advice on climate change and energy transition to governments and companies worldwide.
* It is not the number of experts but the quality of arguments that counts
World Climate Declaration plus all signatories in pdf
To believe that climate change is caused by man is like believing Santa Clause brings you the gift you always wanted. Neither can be proven with direct evidence.
As I start speaking out about how I feel about covid, the environment, gender ideology, and other UN policies which are masquerading as government policies I am still finding people holding on to their understanding of the narrative. I am trying to be polite, yet assertive to why I am taking a different stand. I do find that finding people with a similar view is important. I am doing more research and becoming informed. I am also finding the evil, chaos and craziness in the world is helping me to build my faith.