Nothing in her accounts is problematic. What is problematic, is the use of the word "risk" associated with providing essential banking services to individuals. Can anyone truly believe that any big bank like RBC would be "at risk" from providing services to an individual? Even if that individual were a mass murderer, they would not be at risk. In fact,, this "risk" wording is the disguise for politically motivated debanking, which is a crime against humanity and must be fought by any means available.
‘Laws’. ‘Courts’. The futility of both of those concepts became staggeringly real during the COVID wars.
During COVID, we had ‘sick until proven healthy’ with the vaccine passports.
The Party were all desperate to codify and merge that as the entry point to digital ID (this battle still rages today).
When the digital ID and digital currency happens there will be defacto guilty until proven innocent, with the added bonus of never being able to prove your innocence.
The Blob doesn’t just disappear because of a change in government officials, and we proved that the ‘laws’ and ‘courts’ are mechanisms of the various control systems of the old world.
We’re leaving that world behind now. The only ‘laws’ that have any relevance now are that which are unwritten, and are instinctively known by all.
The very attempt to even write a ‘law’ based on some illusion of ‘consent’ now is simply an attempt at a distortion of reality.
All that remains now is an administrative state, underpinned by an economic state, and those who would continue use that old world infrastructure while it still exists, to attempt to assert control over your life.
"ONCE THEY attack the lawyers, the officers of the court must decide."
Unfortunately, as we've seen in the U.S., leftist trained lawyers are leftists first and always, and not persons of principles or individual integrity. I predict that the officers of the court in Canada will have no trouble looking away. Many will even support the action if asked to comment on it.
Our hope is they are human and their evolution can evolve. You wake up but once. There are the silent who resent this thumb upon them. When we tap those silent it will be a tidal wave.
These lawyers need to learn to do all their business on a cash only basis and buy themselves strong fireproof safes that have protruding bars or plates for attachment to steel reinforcing bars in the concrete in which they should be embedded.
In today’s financial inquisition, banks no longer need pitchforks—just policies. Across the globe, governments have turned financial institutions into tools of enforcement, silencing dissent without trial or due process. The case of Eva Chipiuk is a chilling example: no charges, no crimes—just quiet surveillance and a sudden expulsion.
As currencies go digital and bank oversight tightens, the message is clear—step out of line, and you’ll be cut off. Once you’re on the list, there’s no getting off.
Go hard. Esc key on Substack is a great resource for the architecture of the bankers Clearinghouse protocols now being expanded at all levels through tech as a denial of service model for non compliance.
My banking woes are similar. I've been an LSO member since '91 . Between '19 & '21, while anarcho-tyranny was running wild, I had 7 long standing bank accounts closed. 3 of those were with RBC ; 2 in Canada and 1 in Georgia, USA. No explanation. My best guess was a confluence of activities "disturbed" some entity with a long reach. My three potentially "offending" activities were: (i) serving in an executive role for PPC; (ii) unabashedly supporting Freedom Convoy on social; (iii) and my day job ---> advancing privacy protocols within crypto. Take your pick ;-) Hopefully, for Eva, the harassment stops with de-banking. For me, it spiralled into regulatory lawfare that dragged on for years. The bigger shock than banksters run amok, was the (mostly) disinterest from fellow lawyers who seemed weirdly content with administrative state over-reach.
What recent activity in Eva's accounts are problematic or is this just the generalized debanking wording?
Very vague letter. She seems mystified in her post and calls them on it. Lawyers used to be "good banking risks."
Not if you dare cross examine Trudeau.
Nothing in her accounts is problematic. What is problematic, is the use of the word "risk" associated with providing essential banking services to individuals. Can anyone truly believe that any big bank like RBC would be "at risk" from providing services to an individual? Even if that individual were a mass murderer, they would not be at risk. In fact,, this "risk" wording is the disguise for politically motivated debanking, which is a crime against humanity and must be fought by any means available.
Well said Pony
Thank you. Yes risk is the key word and there is no risk to RBC. Pure BS.
More signs of the d3ecay in Canada - so sad.
This is fully global.
My grandmother was a Menard
‘Laws’. ‘Courts’. The futility of both of those concepts became staggeringly real during the COVID wars.
During COVID, we had ‘sick until proven healthy’ with the vaccine passports.
The Party were all desperate to codify and merge that as the entry point to digital ID (this battle still rages today).
When the digital ID and digital currency happens there will be defacto guilty until proven innocent, with the added bonus of never being able to prove your innocence.
The Blob doesn’t just disappear because of a change in government officials, and we proved that the ‘laws’ and ‘courts’ are mechanisms of the various control systems of the old world.
We’re leaving that world behind now. The only ‘laws’ that have any relevance now are that which are unwritten, and are instinctively known by all.
The very attempt to even write a ‘law’ based on some illusion of ‘consent’ now is simply an attempt at a distortion of reality.
All that remains now is an administrative state, underpinned by an economic state, and those who would continue use that old world infrastructure while it still exists, to attempt to assert control over your life.
"ONCE THEY attack the lawyers, the officers of the court must decide."
Unfortunately, as we've seen in the U.S., leftist trained lawyers are leftists first and always, and not persons of principles or individual integrity. I predict that the officers of the court in Canada will have no trouble looking away. Many will even support the action if asked to comment on it.
Our hope is they are human and their evolution can evolve. You wake up but once. There are the silent who resent this thumb upon them. When we tap those silent it will be a tidal wave.
These lawyers need to learn to do all their business on a cash only basis and buy themselves strong fireproof safes that have protruding bars or plates for attachment to steel reinforcing bars in the concrete in which they should be embedded.
That letter is chilling. This bank needs to be put out of business and every one of its executives shamed and ostracized.
The banality of evil, per Hanna Arendt
Lisa,
In today’s financial inquisition, banks no longer need pitchforks—just policies. Across the globe, governments have turned financial institutions into tools of enforcement, silencing dissent without trial or due process. The case of Eva Chipiuk is a chilling example: no charges, no crimes—just quiet surveillance and a sudden expulsion.
As currencies go digital and bank oversight tightens, the message is clear—step out of line, and you’ll be cut off. Once you’re on the list, there’s no getting off.
https://t.me/TheMacroButlerSubstack/182
I stay local. Everybody in town knows where we all live. Shit be different that way.
Go hard. Esc key on Substack is a great resource for the architecture of the bankers Clearinghouse protocols now being expanded at all levels through tech as a denial of service model for non compliance.
Great explanation with the Globalist takedown of our speech, therefore no democratic society, thank you for this presentation!
My banking woes are similar. I've been an LSO member since '91 . Between '19 & '21, while anarcho-tyranny was running wild, I had 7 long standing bank accounts closed. 3 of those were with RBC ; 2 in Canada and 1 in Georgia, USA. No explanation. My best guess was a confluence of activities "disturbed" some entity with a long reach. My three potentially "offending" activities were: (i) serving in an executive role for PPC; (ii) unabashedly supporting Freedom Convoy on social; (iii) and my day job ---> advancing privacy protocols within crypto. Take your pick ;-) Hopefully, for Eva, the harassment stops with de-banking. For me, it spiralled into regulatory lawfare that dragged on for years. The bigger shock than banksters run amok, was the (mostly) disinterest from fellow lawyers who seemed weirdly content with administrative state over-reach.
Horrific social credit on display. The brown nosers don't understand they are on a chess board, until they hear mate.
What a dirty sinister agenda
Thanks for your commentary, your book and the interview with Corrinne Mori. Thanks for speaking out.
I'd be going to the International Court on Human Rights no Bank Account no way to by Food etc
These controlling Bankers are the Worlds Achilles Heel
The" royal " bank took my last 15 bucks 50 plus years ago as a service charge. Scum sucking pigs.