Population Activities

Lottery tickets in exchange for your sterility.

Image from the Conversation

We are in the throes of ‘population activities’.

Population Activities is parlance for Depopulation. Depopulation can occur through 2 methods. Decreasing births: through infertility, abortion, still birth, miscarriage, delaying birth for social reasons, and thus increasing the span between generations. Alternatively, depopulation can be as a result of increasing Deaths. This is achieved by murder, war, violence in our societies, delaying health care, preventing health care, isolating and creating fear, applying poisons, increasing disease, decreasing nutrition, increasing worry, causing poverty and so on and so forth.

If you look at the themes our leftist governments deal in you might easily wonder if you could lump the activity in a Population Activity.

For instance:

Open air drugs sites which facilitate addiction and violence within the community: Yes P.A.

Abortion until and after birth:

Yes P.A.

administering substances that reduce fertility:

Yes. P.A.

Mandating the youth obtain pro-myocarditis producing, injections to attend school or play in the NBA.

Yes. P.A.

Creating a culture that has disdain for marriage, family and faith.

Yes. P.A.

Sterilizing the youth prior to puberty and even an interest in sex.

Yes. P.A.

Take a factor you are observing and ask yourself does it increase death or decrease birth.

Depopulation or Population Activities has been an aim of the UN, since the early 70s. That is to say, in some way the organization is bent on killing us by increments for decades.

We fund the UN.

Int J Health Serv. 1973 Fall;3(4):679-87.

doi: 10.2190/6CFA-N9FR-L6MD-K5LR.

The United Nations Fund for Population Activities

R M Salas

• PMID: 4596079

• DOI: 10.2190/6CFA-N9FR-L6MD-K5LR

“Abstract

As of the end of January 1973, the United Nations Fund for Population Activities was supporting almost 600 population projects in 76 developing countries and areas, with cumulative resources of more than $80 million contributed by 60 governments. The rapid expansion of resources and activities experienced by the Fund since its inception five years ago is evidence of the remarkable rate at which international concern for world population problems, once aroused, has been translated into action. The Fund, as the recognized focal point of population efforts of the United Nations system, has moved further toward its objective of encouraging universal participation in population activities. The Fund provides assistance to governments in the areas of collecting basic population data, population dynamics, population policy, education and communication, multisector activities, and, most extensively, family planning. The Fund's continuing role as a major multilateral source of assistance in the population field was confirmed in December 1972, when the United Nations General Assembly changed the Fund from a trust fund of the Secretary-General to a fund under the authority of the Assembly itself.”

600 population activities projects in 1973. Do you think they got better at it?

In this below article, Abortion is presented as a Population Activity. Is it a ‘right’ or is population activity. Family planning is how we now describe this part of P.A. Ie. plan to have none.

Interaction 1986 Jan;6(1):8-9.

The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee

S L Camp

• PMID: 12340678

“Abstract

PIP: The Vice President of the Population Crisis Committee comments on current US population policies and on the potential impact of these policies on family planning programs around the world. The policies of the current administration pose a serious threat to family planning programs in developing countries. In May, 1984, the administration issued a population policy draft which identified economic mismanagement as the cause of most 3rd World problems and claimed that the free enterprise system was capable of solving most population growth problems. It further stated that the US would no longer provide funding support to any government or nongovernment organization (NGO) which promoted abortions regardless of the funding source for the abortion activities. The draft paper engendered considerable negative reaction, and it was revised before it was presented at the Mexico City Population Conference in July, 1984. The revised policy exempted foreign government organizations and agencies from the abortion restrictions. The restrictions were preserved for all NGOs. In December, 1984, the government began to implement the policy in earnest. US$17 million is support was withdrawn from the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). IPPF operates worldwide and is a major source of contraceptive supplies in many Latin American and African countries. 6 years ago IPPF, at the request of US Agency for International Development (USAID) instituted accounting procedures to track all abortion related expenses. Less than .5% of the federation's funds are spent on abortion related activities. In January, 1985, funds previously appropriated for the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) were withheld because of UNFPA involvement in family planning in China. No US funds were used in the UNFPA China project, and UNFPA was not involved in abortion activities in China. Indeed, UNFPA policies prohibit involvement in abortion programs and in any coercive program. In March, 1985, all but US$10 million in appropriated funds were released to UNFPA as a result of congressional and foreign pressure. Steps to restrict the activities of national and local level NGOs are also being taken. The administration is planning to impose contract restriction on all USAID grant agreements. The restriction will forbid all foreign NGOs from promoting abortion regardless of the source of the funding for abortion activities. Preliminary wording of the contract clause indicates that the restrictions will apply to all abortions except those undertaken to save the life of the mother and that the NGOs will have to allow US inspection of all their books. These restrictions cannot be applied to USAID contracts awarded to NGOs in the US because these restrictions would be illegal in the US; however, US NGOs will be required to impose these restriction on any overseas subgrantees. These restrictions will force USAID to increase funding for the generally less effective programs which are operated by foreign governments. Worldwide negative consequences of the new US policies will include increases in unwanted pregnancy, infant mortality, maternal mortality, and abortion.”

In this article we learn that the World Bank is willing to give money to countries (I guess their leadership class) who are willing to undertake programs to reduce their population growth rate.

Remember you can reduce the growth rate 2 ways. Increase deaths and decrease births. Should you government tell you what those programs are; when they engage in them. Should they get rich when fentanyl comes in and crimes and violence go up.

The World Bank pays leaders or governments to increase deaths and decrease births. When can that go awry. Are there no limits to ‘benefits’ of the elites deciding to institute programs that either accelerate or increase death or decelerate or prevent births. Are all such programs PG? or by nature of dealing in deaths are they necessarily prone to slide into evil.

Can you conceive of any programs that would fly in the face of ethics. Should to be trusting those in power to always be instituting programs in your best interest. or will some of these become Population Activities with you in the cross-fire? Does a little touch of skepticism go a long way in maintaining your health, fertility and status as a live citizen?

Int J Health Serv. 1973 Fall;3(4):709-18.

doi: 10.2190/551L-GRX7-1MAD-UXDE.

The concern and contribution of the World Bank in population planning

K Kanagaratnam

• PMID: 4788247

• DOI: 10.2190/551L-GRX7-1MAD-UXDE

“Abstract

PIP: The present efforts to improve standards of living throughout the world would be threatened by high population growth rates. In three different ways the World Bank is trying to do something about this problem: a) increasing awareness of adverse consequences of population growth, b) alerting national leaders to the demographic conditions of their own countries, c) giving aid to countries willing to implement programs for reduction of growth rates. Tables complement the text in summarizing the growth of lending by the Bank and the International Development Association and indicating future planned activities.”

There really is no end to the ways in which a government funded by the UN might try to reduce population.

In this article I discovered a project that was aimed at giving you Lottery tickets in exchange for your sterility. Not even money. Just the chance to win some. Oh jeez. A scratch ticket for your nuts. A bingo game for your fallopian tubes.

Asian Pac Popul Programme News. 1984;13(1):17-9.

Population planning: a well co-ordinated approach required

No authors listed

• PMID: 12313052

• “The more recent innovative measures to encourage the 2-child child family norm in India include: increased compensation money to acceptors of sterilization and IUD and giving lottery tickets to acceptors of sterilization. There is recognition in these countries of the need for an integrated approach to population and development programs.”

Does that contextualize at all our trans movement aimed at children’s genitalia and reproduction abilities which get chopped and permanently sidelined? Or is the program devoid of Population activities? And I have swamp land in Florida for you.

In this article looking at reducing the population in India financial incentives in exchange for sterilization are again mentioned .

“Financial incentives are also given to acceptors of sterilization and IUD to compensate them for loss of wages sustained during hospitalization and convalescence. Yet, any incentives that are offered can only be very selected and limited in scope due to the vast numbers of target couples.

The present strategy is to cover as many couples as possible by increasing the facilities for sterilization in the District and taluka hospitals and the primary health centers. The government has also decided to liberalize the rate of payments to the State governments on sterilization. Addition funds have been provided for incentives at higher rates to motivators”

Yojana. 1983 Jan 26;27(1-2):17-20.Population problem, a planner's view

S B Chavan

• PMID: 12311992

Could you imagine subjecting yourself or your child to a treatment so you get some benefits? Would your government in the throes of a Population Activity tell you about the consequences of the Population Activity?

What could be a benefit that you become programmed to value and select for? Ie your own little lottery ticket of sorts? Being of course, also your game of Russian roulette of Adverse Events and death and your progeny’s opportunity to procreate. What would you through dancing nurses, late night comedy, universal messaging, come to accept. What would you take in order to get the following lottery tickets?

• travel;

• entering stores and restaurants;

• going into non essential businesses like the cinema and the gym;

• leaving the country;

• keeping your business open;

• having access to health care;

• having access to an organ transplant;

Do you see why those technocrats have FIRM and ridiculous policies around the above. These policies and mRNA are not going away, despite the currently comforted that they are. They don’t go away until we win. We win by being the majority. Let’s hope that is not through the attrition of population activities.

Would you be valued higher than other individuals for having smaller families or non-exitance families? I wonder he doesn’t procreate. Well if you have sex with the same sex it doesn’t work. If you are a furry and have sex with other species it doesn’t work. Do we see celebration of these activities. It is about inclusivity OR is it about celebrating the accord of a population activity.

If you want to celebrate a population activity. Fine. But don’t dance around it. I see through it. Straight and past and through and beyond and still more. Are you celebrating women’s rights to kill a full term baby. Are you celebrating that. Are you calling infanticide in our society good? Have the balls to say your satanic antilife population activities and Name them. China called the one child policy: THE ONE CHILD POLICY. NONE OTHER. FLEE THE COUNTRY. IT IS THE ONE CHILD POLICY.

I love my gay friends, neighbours and family. I don’t care. But when we have the CELEBRATION for months or seasons or whatever. It’s not because we are being inclusive. If China was naming Pride month it would be: the month we home more people chose unions that don’t result in kids month. Please wear the jersey or fly the flag of NOT RESULTING IN KIDS flag. that IS ALL THEY CARE ABOUT. THEY DO NOT CARE about anyone. they don’t care about LGBT. They do not. they want you to chose the Q through Z and volunteer you genitals. and Trans surgery in China would be called: We are taking your dick so you can’t make babies surgery. That’s it. We are cutting off your breasts and they will never be used to suckle a baby surgery. They don’t care if you think you are in the wrong body. you think I’m wrong. you think my opinion is the problem.

seeing and saying is the problem. The only people who will hate this are those in charge of policing Population Activities. they are the angry ones intimidating us all. They never seem like LGBT that you know personally because they are angry and militant and intimidating. Population Activities. Let us in your schools for our …. drum roll… population actives.

remember if you chose the rainbow, beer brands will throw themselves on the pyre of Population Activities.

chose like Dylan and you will be rewarded. THAT IS THE NONSTOP MESSAGE. BECAUSE WE ARE IN END GAME POPULATION ACTIVIES.

Are we seeing sterilized trans being thrown away once they choose the de-nutting?

Have you considered who the UN is at war with? Faith groups.

What do Catholics do. OH JEEZ. Do they procreate. Damn it Janet. How about other faith groups, like Muslims and Orthodox Jews. In the cross hairs. Procreation is the reason.

Think like a Depopulator. Corner the language. Corner the dialogue.

https://www.unfpa.org/

The UN has a fund that covers all this. But notably the language around depopulation has altered into rights. Women’s Rights. Are they? Is sterilization a women’s right? Is family prevention, really family planning? Is leaving your faith for hedonism and Godlessness really a fundamental freedom and soon a requirement they hope to impose?

If sterilization is described as success in terms of Population Activities then can we not graphically see areas in our current society that promote sterilization?

Yojana. 1983 Jan 26;27(1-2):15-6, 56.

Checking population pressure in India

S P Mittal

• PMID: 12311991

“The Association has been successful in creating an environment of political consensus in favor of family planning. Apart from education and motivational campaigns, there are incentives and disincentives. Incentives include monetary compensation to acceptors and motivators. Some opposition exists in relation to disincentives. The feeling exists that the line between compulsion and disincentives is very thin. The following are included among the program's incentives and disincentives: cash incentives of Rs. 1000 after 2 children for undergoing sterilization and RS. 250 after 3 children for undergoing sterilization; highest priority for allotment of commercial or housing plots or flats to couples who adopt sterilization; and a maternity leave of 120 days for the 1st child if followed by sterilization, 90 days for the 2nd child if followed by sterilization, and no leave thereafter.”

Imagine requiring a new jab to go to school as a Freshman in the fall. Wow. Imagine while at Browns you graduate on hormones, without your breast, or nuts as the case be. Imagine thinking NEITHER IS A POPULATION ACTIVITY, but rather is safe and effective OR inclusive, loving and affirming.

Image from Nocollegemandates.com

Ok what would be the ultimate way to sterilize the population. Make them show a QR code to get the cash in their own accounts. then all the QR codes and biometrics will lead to the worst bio-metric of all. I’m sorry I’m writing uncomfortable things. Just tie the loose ends up by evaluating all in the light of:

Population Activities. Then evaluate your medical team pushing you to make a decision. Is it in your interest to wait until you are 25 before de-nutting? Or if you don’t mind doing it for the nutters in charge of this planet, fine. But do not think you are doing it just for yourself. You are doing it for the purpose of chopping down your family tree. That’s it. You may or may not achieve your dream of being in the right body, having taken off the testicles responsible for the sperm which does the fertilizer thing in eggs. But the depopulators in charge of population activities will be monitoring these surgeries. Not because THEY CARE. But like all these articles I reviewed, sterilization is the objective and is tracked. You are a nut-job if you see this evidence and think differently.

So how do you evaluate the plummeting birth rates in vaccinated countries in light of this article. Success in the world of Population Activities.

This is how I interpret OUR WORLD. You may be less cynical. However in my view you’re a dreamer. With your head in the clouds. If you refuse to see the evidence because they have nicer names and corner the dialogue then I have one response:

Darwin is on the march everywhere. It just is what it is.