Oversimplified
History has lessons. Revolt follows too much oppression. The Rule of Law must be protected. Those who consider it expendable, will find Jacobins seething. Justice that has no Court finds the streets. The people are demanding justice.
Since that is predictable, it must be the the stage on which the next power desires to enter in on.
The observed result is the intended result.
The method to keep peace, is reason and morality. Preserve our institutions. Our Nations.
When you watch the video, the visual of oppression and the power of the people is accurate. The people have the power.
However all I see is that division is the aim of the current power structure. It's as though the violence is what is sought. Unity is what they, not us, fear.
Violence would be tragic. Give them what they don't want. Preservation of our institutions. Unity is this pursuit. But watch the video to understand the power is in the people. The visuals so oversimplified may be just what you crave. We are told to fear them. But it is the reverse. We will become more united.
Enlightenment.
The Awakening. We are witnessing mankind leaving the cave. Again.
"For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which everyone designs to secure by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making: whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, which is the end for which they are in society." --- John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (1689)
For the Overlords, there can never be "too much oppression". That's the starting point. And it leads directly to: ANYTHING that allows them to apply all the oppression they are driven to apply, serves their purpose.
But this isn't a civilized chess game. They will find a way no matter what if not blocked.
We have been debt and credit slaves for decades, drained and barely holding on to a short-lived middle class. Either there is active resistance, and we hold the line or there is lost ground. Have the majority lost the will to resist, push back, declare boundaries to the abuse? Are they even awake to it?
What really moves the mass of intelligent yet uneducated people to take responsibility for their own experience and their own future?
I heard that South Africans tolerated apartheid until -- of all things -- their soccer team was banned from international competition because of the apartheid blockades. THAT moved them. Was there something as uniting in the French Revolution (or just bankers' money betting for special outcomes?) that we can recognize?
I read that the Globalists have decided -- in the name of 'climate change' and 'clean energy' -- to BAN pizza ovens as carbon belchers. Will that get couch potatoes off the couch to join AmRev 2.0?
You always get us pondering. Thanks.
It is a strange type of trickery when the will of the state takes more importance than the people. The state claims to be providing protection from the unknown, while it is them that is the problem.
I pray that more people come to understand. That people can say no to things they do not understand or want. I am doing my part to learn, inform and not comply.