Lost in the tower of Ethics

THEME: public health and totalitarianism

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.” – Sun Tzu

Do you know the path we have in front of us and that we must win. Think on that, for the technocrats have been thinking on it for some time. You have less time to think. because they have been making you busy ‘reacting’. No more of this react. Chart your path so that it includes preserving your nation, your community and your family. If you just let yourself be tossed by the forces right now, you will be a boat unmoored in the storm.

“A warrior never worries about his fear.” – Carlos Castaneda

I believe the plan is to ‘untether’ all their links in a systematic fashion. And we need a community of actors to do. Not so many as you think. Far less then you would believe. Believe that when you ‘add yourself’ it will be sufficient.

Today I look at a paper written in reaction to the ‘Sars pandemic’. I sued the government as a result of that pandemic so this paper and the resultant perversions I observe are all the more interesting for me.

I examine some aspects of this paper:

University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics. Pandemic influenza and ethics – stand on guard for thee. Ethical considerations in preparedness and planning for pandemic influenza, 2005 (http://www. utoronto.ca/jcb/home/documents/pandemic.pdf, accessed 1 October 2007).

In this paper ‘substantive values’ are examined in order to ‘guide’ ethical decision-making in a Pandemic Influenza Outbreak.

In examining the Substantive Value : “Individual liberty “ the paper stated

“In a public health crisis, restrictions to individual liberty may be necessary to protect the public from serious harm. Restrictions to individual liberty should:

• be proportional, necessary, and relevant;

• employ the least restrictive means; and

• be applied equitably.”

We can openly criticize the pandemic’s response in most western counties in that it was not PROPORTIONAL, NECESSARY OR RELEVANT (MASKING QUARANTINE, QR CODES, REQUIRING VACCINATION FOR MOVEMENT especially when these were neither effective nor safe within the normal concept of save’

They did not employ the ‘least restrictive means’. Firing and silencing dissenting doctors was not equitable, nor ‘least restrictive’.

In terms of the businesses that were eliminated through these policies, they were not applied equitably. Nor did those in charge review decisions to review the published articles. Instead out came the requirement TO SILENT DISSENT AND CONTROL SPEECH THE BIGGEST RUBBISH CONSEQUENCE OF THE PANDEMIC. CONTROL FOR THE SAKE OF CONTROL AND WORSE IT MEANT WE ARRIVED AT THE WORST OF ALL DECISIONS.

“The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.” ― G.K. Chesterton

The application of this ‘power’ to keep us safe resulted in the worst possible ethical demise of the value ‘INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY’. There is no ‘public health’ benefit of an inoculation that didn’t prevent the disease; that denied informed consent; and silenced dissenting opinions offering other medical interventions (successful at that).

It was not proportional to silence dissent in every social sphere nor use the pulpit to create fear and division. It was unethical to eliminate political speech and individual freedoms for flawed science.

In ever examination of the pandemic’s response the ethical value of Individual Liberty was ignored. Instead the pandemic was politicized for profit. the true ethical dilemma was the

None of those requirements were proportional. Show me the study of the unvaccinated excess deaths post vaccination. Show me the study of the vaccinated participation in excess deaths. control of the narrative by those lost in a smog of power, was part of the worst excess of UNETHICAL behavior. Only the ‘top’ and compromised scientists it no seems had access to the pulpit and voice and it parroted control by the government of people in excessive manner.

The paper further discusses the value:

“Protection of the public from harm”

To protect the public from harm, health care organizations and public health authorities may be required to take actions that impinge on individual liberty. Decision makers should:

• weigh the imperative for compliance;

• provide reasons for public health measures to encourage compliance; and

• establish mechanisms to review decisions.

Instead we have the creation of harm through the use of public health. Once evidence of the vaccine’s harm were available and scientists were raising the alarm, those in public health drunk on power, only accelerated the pressures to silence opposition and further utilized the pulpit of control and the only access to ‘media’ to further silence this dissent. This even amounted to using traditionally viewed sources in big tech to schmeer and malign any professional who would stand up against the ‘narrative’ viewpoints and ‘truistic’ facts. Influencers and celebreties’’ were used to shame and bully public opinion. This lack of ‘review’ was so ugly as to require a new ethical examination and to strip those who have run the governments of countries in archaic repressive regimes through the pulpit of ‘ethical public health’.

There was no mechanism to challenge decisions, and examine the dissent. Therefore any review was simply a doubling down on the existing paradigms which were hugely excessive and cost many lives. If you examine the economy, lost schooling, lost learning, suicides, obesity, diabetes, loss of businesses, abuse of drugs and alcohol and the lives lost within this there is a public health emergency that arouse. this is whiteout the consequences of moving the society to a authoritarian and totalitarian regime that would not support dissent and quash in every aspect the agility to dissent, and moreover safely dissent without those in powers abusing their powers against those voices with ab hominem attacks and the force of control of media, big tech and even politicians for such attacks. Therefore rather than review the decisions the power entrusted in public health, turned into a desire for rampant power upon power.

This is culminated in a world wide push for the ultimate power of public health through IHR amendments and Public health WHO Treaty, which will use the idea of health to ELIMINATE LIBERTY. it is so absurd that men of good conscience do not examine the consequences.

“A warrior has to believe, otherwise, he cannot activate his intent positively.” ― Théun Mares

This entity proposes ‘camps’ and a gendarmerie to round up the ‘sick’ or worse THE DISSENTERS. imagine a place where public health is the reason for totalitarian government and you’ve excised completely any substance of ethics. It thus becomes a smoke screen for Facism, Stalinism, Communism and the loss of liberties.

It also eliminates the nation state. I wonder if that is a PROPORTIONAL RESPONSE. I WONDER IF THAT IS A DESIRABLE RESPOINSE. SINCE THIS IS ALSO TAKING PLACE IN SECRECY FROM THE CITIZENS, I WONDER TOO IF THAT IS UP FOR ‘REVIEW’. I wonder if now the power has so coalesced through the 'smoke’ of PUBLIC HEALTH, that it is a coup. IT IS A COUP. IT IS A COUP. IT IS A COUP.

Then there is the conflict of interest with the Vaccine manufacturers both in terms of their profit for a rather deathly concoction mandated through governments AND their control of the WHO. Really do we need to have GAVI et al controlling the new world government body. Seems like a complete lack of proportionality to the ‘pandemic’ THAT IS WE GO FROM HAVING A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT WITH HUMAN RIGHTS AND CHARTERS AND BILL OF RIGHTS TO A GLOBALIST Government with an economy by appointment and clearly unaccountable (you don’t vote for the WHO) government in charge, WHERE NOTABLE

SO WHERE’S THAT ‘REVIEW OF DECISIONS’. Those in public health moving us in lock step are so clouded by their ‘objectives’ or their pay check that they do not know what they burn on the pyre.

Having a clarity of vision right now seems like a true and rare gift.

This is continuing unabated as though and I see no REVIEW of DECISIONS in order to show case AN ETHICAL OUTCOME THAT DOESN’T INVOLVE A TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENT GOVERNED BY THOSE IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

Those of us who understand: fortify yourself, we have a privilege of being born in times that require us. There is not greater calling then that uses our best talents to vanquish an enemy who would fell our loved ones, our community or our nation.

Proportionality is another ‘ETHICAL’ consideration mentioned in the paper.

“Proportionality requires that restrictions to individual liberty and measures taken to protect the public from harm should not exceed what is necessary to address the actual level of risk to or critical needs of the community.”

Shall we give a good chuckle as we contemplate the the WHO PANDEMIC TREATY and IHR regulations scheduled at the end of this month invites a totalitarian regime introduced where human rights can be avoided without consequence. SO AN UNACCOUNTABLE, UNELECTED, BODY WITH AN ARMY (YES THEY HAVE ADDED THAT IMPORTANT enforcement mechanism).

I should note that those giving our nation state over to the only meat eaters that will be left on the planet (as we eat bugs in compliance TRULY and horrifically NOT a conspiracy theory please look up C40 cities and the 2030 goals enforced by CBDC TO understand what is explicitly set out), believe they will remain in power?

But this nuance is true for them: that THEY will enjoy communism and totalitarianism over their ‘political rivals’. And enjoy living in said communism? How little their nugget has been utilized with Imagination.

So these political hounds, having access to speech and employment and a good reputation un-attacked by the power brokers of media and big tech, believe when they hand over the constitutions of their nations they will be making themselves Kings. And with said limited imagination, they foment the idea of having ‘arrived’ and conquered their political foe, in this case ‘the evil right’.

Ha. I find that the most delusional of the concepts. Their offices will be redundant. They will have no voice: for it is not a voice to PARROT what your puppeteers require.

And that is the easiest of the options they may find themselves in. The other is that the office is eliminated or transitioned altogether. When communist leaders take over a country, they eliminate the ‘useful idiots’ of the left that served them, BECAUSE, their disillusionment makes them powerful enemies to the regime. That is what happens in ‘history’. But history is now ‘dirty’, and we mustn't learn from our past.

There will be no ‘equity’ except in 'abject poverty’. Those now deemed ‘elites’, in the sub-managerial roles? well they had better have the stomach for what the ‘GREATER GOOD’ will next require.

If there is an ethical instinct left in those in the pulpits of power, or even a self-preservation instinct, they should CROSS THE FLOOR NOW. cross the floor and defeat the ‘words’. THEY ARE WORDS. that are becoming the least ETHICAL VERSION OF HUMANITY. under the guise of the Greater Good.

If you think this stops with ESG, or Equity, these are the pretty pictures that distract the busy from the totalitarian future at our door steps.

if the power was meant for accountability you' would be able to read it in the provisions. IT IS NOT. AND the public health ‘powers’ we’ve experience through the pandemic, lends us what lens to view the BIGGER BROTHER OF BIG BROTHER?

Think it is not so?

SHALL WE CONTINUE ON THEIR LITTLE USED PAPER.

“Privacy” Is another ethical value

“Individuals have a right to privacy in health care. In a public health crisis, it may be necessary to override this right to protect the public from serious harm.

The notion of ‘Serious’ was not at all given the necessary import. Privacy has been the value not simply eliminated in the management pandemic, but BECAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC. Here we are in Canada with a Big Brother government that insists on eliminating privacy in order to score individuals. Privacy is proposed to be eliminated everywhere: in health data; in banking with the advent of CBDC on social medial and tech platforms; in the governance of public bodies.

Thus not only was privacy discarded during the pandemic, the lack of privacy was used to score citizens and assign rights to them or remove those rights. Thus it is the ugliest of versions of use of Privacy by a government. It has now established a ‘trend’ in which that lack of privacy is ‘normalized’ for the greater good and becomes an exchange of information that quantifies into quantum rights and social credit, individuals future access to society.

If you think public health has been ethical over the past 3 years, it has not. It has been responsible for ushering in an iron curtain that the weight of our energy in the public and private sphere should be actively attempting to push back. If we fail. we will only be left with a modicum of health, economy, nationalism, communities. the rest will be burning on the pyre of public health. which is the ultimate socialism.

The wars that are won without bullets are here. And they have started with the capture of your ability to think clearly by making you scared of an invisible virus. All the while real tyrants are operating without check. What they intend to take next is culminating with the WHO Treaty and IHR amendments and it is warfare with words but will come next with Bullets.

If you aren’t interested in standing yet, I must wonder, what is it you are waiting for. Fortify yourself to move now into the world with knowledge that you must actively concretely untether their tethers. Anger is useful. Fear is not. Fear confuses and also keeps us from seeing the lay of the land.

Most useful are the cold calculations. Where it is that you are with the tools that you have. What we need to achieve in terms of the WHO grab for power? acts presented in every Parliament that dismantles the original 2005 Treaty, with pressure on citizens

Those in media schilling for the narrative must BREACK FREE AND PRESENT TRUTH. ALL FAILURES TO DO SO SERVE AN ENEMY WORSE THAN ANY VIRUS YOU CAN IMAGINE. TOTALITARIAN regimes controlled digitally and with CBDC are far uglier because they want to be ‘perpetual’ in service to a new societal governance. And eliminate freedom, not for the length of the story you write, but for the universe of time. SHOW THEM THEY ARE WRONG. COURAGE BEGETS COURAGE. TRUTH BEGETS ACTION. AND ACTION THEY FEAR.

Those who have been pushed to the very most left by the agenda that seems to be supported by these tyrants, must understand how ill they are being used and how little they will see their ‘visions’ survive tyranny.

Those who don’t act because they would have to eat humble pie. swallow. Better to upset your stomach now then lose what is proposed later.

Please like share, subscribe and upgrade your subscription if you see fit.