LION Tribunal: YOU ARE going to Pay for employee injury with the jab

Australian Tribunal orders compensation for SA government employee who developed pericarditis after COVID jab

Per the article

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-01-31/sa-government-employee-wins-compensation-after-covid-vaccine/103408524

• “In short: A former youth support worker has won an appeal against the South Australian government after he suffered pericarditis from a COVID vaccine.

• A tribunal found he was entitled to workers compensation because he was mandated to have a booster shot to continue employment.

• What's next? The man will receive weekly income support and medical payments.

• South Australian government employee who fell ill after getting a mandatory COVID vaccine has won compensation against his employer.

  Daniel Shepherd worked as a child and youth support worker with the Department for Child Protection when he had a third dose of the COVID vaccine in February 2022.

  Directions made under the Emergency Management Act in January 2022 required certain workers such as Mr Shepherd to get a booster shot to continue working.

  SA Employment Tribunal documents showed Mr Shepherd experienced aching joints, cold and flu symptoms and minor chest pain after his first COVID vaccine in August 2021.

  He had similar symptoms following his second shot.

  He had those shots when he was employed by Baptist Care SA which encouraged, but did not require, COVID vaccinations.

  In February 2022, Mr Shepherd felt severe chest pain the day after he had his third shot, which grew steadily worse until two weeks later he experienced pain so "unbearable" he thought he was having a heart attack.

  The 44-year-old was taken by ambulance to Ashford Hospital where cardiologists diagnosed Mr Shepherd with post-vaccine pericarditis – an inflammation of the membrane around the heart.

  The employee has been off work since March 2022, except for a period of two months when he worked in a part-time administrative role.

  He made a claim for workers compensation, claiming vaccine-related injury, but was rejected. 

  Tribunal deputy president Judge Mark Calligeros ruled that the vaccination mandate and Mr Shepherd's employment were "both significant contributing causes" of the applicant's injury.

  "Mr Shepherd was required to have a third dose of the vaccine to continue performing duties and be paid," he said.

  "The vaccine mandate would not have applied to him had he not been employed by DCP and working in a healthcare setting.

  "The connection between employment and the injury is a strong one given I have found that Mr Shepherd would not have had a third dose of the vaccine if he had not been required to in order to continue working."

  His employer argued that his injury was a result of the Emergency Management Act directive and liability would be excluded under the same act.”

Just in time for our up next rounds.

At some point (sorry)

Fraud vitiates fraud

It will be time that the story tellers CNN THE VIEW

The profiteers pharma GAVI

And the puppeteers, the WEF WHO take theirs.

Jugular.

Go for the jugular.

Or send this to your employer who injured you or fired you.

Let the games begin.