International Health Regulations vs. Freedom
Time to get in the ring
Image from Reuters
Too often the Amendments to the International Health Regulations, or the New Pandemic Treaty are dismissed because we believe our Constitutional Instruments in our respective countries will protect us. However it is likely (past) time to reconsider that facile assumption and dig into the repressions being advanced, these are architectures of power and we would do well to demand our MPs refuse these amendments.
Now there are two instruments. The Pandemic Treaty itself and the Amendments to the IHR (2005).
The International Health Regulations (IHR 1969) was replaced by IHR 2005. These were adopted by the World Health Assembly on 23 May 2005 and came into force on 15 June 2007. IHR 2005 are a legally binding agreement among World Health Organisation (WHO) member states and other states that have agreed to be bound by them. As of 2020 196 member states had ratified the 2005 IHR.
click here WATCH THIS SUMMARY
Here is a poster you can print in areas you have access to or use for your purposes.
According to James Roguski"
“Most people are completely unaware that the 75th World Health Assembly DID ADOPT AMENDMENTS to 5 Articles of the International Health Regulations on May 27, 2022.
They can still be rejected by every member nation, but the deadline to reject them is the end of November 2023.
CLICK HERE and HERE to learn more.”
“Petition to the Government of Canada
Whereas:
Parliament has neither discussed nor debated Canada’s participation in a proposed World Health Organization (WHO) International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response (Pandemic Treaty) that is currently being negotiated and due to be signed by May 2024;
In parallel to the Pandemic Treaty drafting process, hundreds of amendments have been proposed by 16 member states to the International Health Regulations (IHRs), which govern the conduct of countries and provide the legal framework for the WHO to exercise its powers;
Parliament has neither discussed nor debated the amendments to 5 Articles of the IHR that were adopted by the 75th World Health Assembly on May 27, 2022 and states have 18 months to opt out of these amendments;
The outcomes of these efforts will give legally binding, “emergency” powers to the WHO, with potential far-reaching impacts on the lives, health and human rights of Canadians; and
Canada must be careful not to agree to anything that could give away our sovereignty on health care, even if there is tremendous international pressure to do so for the sake of pandemic preparedness.
We, the undersigned, citizens of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to urgently allow Parliament the opportunity to debate and vote on the amendments to the IHRs that have already been adopted by the 75th World Health Assembly and to allow opportunity for parliamentary scrutiny of the proposed amendments currently being negotiated by WHO delegates.This is an anti-democratic Regime of control. Power without checks or accountability has historically resulted in the worst possible atrocities. The silence in MSM or in our houses of Parliament, democracy, do not bode well. The amendments were proposed initially by the Biden administration. Under the guise of optimal One Health, we sacrifice principles of self-determination. A more fundamental discussion in law is not taking place. “
Other resources are found here.
http://StopTheAmendments.com
http://ExitTheWHO.org (worldwide)
http://ExitTheWHO.com (USA)
http://ThePeoplesDeclaration.com
http://ScrewTheWHO.com
How would the following work with the new powers?
digital ID and passports;
censorship;
climate as the reason for ‘lockdowns’;
Programmable currency;
AI;
Global. Government.
Treaties are not the "Supreme Law of the Land" in the US. Most people never read the whole "Supremacy Clause," only the part that fits their agenda. So, let's take a look at the first part.
Article VI, paragraph 2: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, (and here's the key part) under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land."
"UNDER the authority of the United States!" Well, what is under the authority of the United States? It is those delegated powers, and ONLY those delegated powers given by the States to the federal government, when they ratified and amend over time, the Constitution.
Therefore, no law or treaty that does not comply with the Constitution, or is outside the Constitution in scope or power, is NOT BINDING or ENFORCEABLE on We the People of the United States! Same goes for unconstitutional laws passed by Congress, like the Clinton Gun Ban. It covers illegal Presidential actions like undeclared wars. It also covers unconstitutional opinions of the Supreme Court like Roe v Wade, which was constitutionally impossible, and also covers any laws, regulations or policies out of the Supreme Court because their power ends at the parties to the cases as delegated in Article III.
The point is to always remember the clause, "Under the authority of the United States." The federal government can not make laws, regulations, policies, or treaties, that are outside the specific powers delegated in the Constitution. This is because the individual States are like separate and independent countries, which, when they Unite, can delegate powers to the subordinate federal government, through the Constitution.
Greg Penglis
Creator and Host of the Action Radio Citizen Legislature
BlogTalkRadio.com/citizenaction
WriteYourLaws.com
We are all engaged in a physical and spiritual battle. The enemy is not lurking in the shadows or in a far away country. It is at our doorsteps banging on the door. These are not people offering help for the ills of the world. This is the evil that has created struggle, despair and pain. Their ammendments will be the one size solution that greatly benefits them.