Evolutionary Bottle Neck is trusting government policies

This article discusses that family planning has always been about depopulation rather than a right. It discusses further that religion is one of the forces that cause increases in population. It is identified and right in the squares of the depopulators. War on fertility is a systematic war that started a long time ago. We know China’s policies included infanticide and forced abortions. I have thought since 2022 that the new vision for Abortion in OECD countries was that it would become the State’s right. Horrific. or just what China did. What else are we doing that is just what China does. What else do we see.

Repressing Christian world views; Burning Churches; defaming history to accomplish it. the propaganda is necessary and perhaps too depopulators believe eliminating religious views are necessary. The war on God has been eons. Fertility attenuating clot shots. Whisking children to their sterilization procedures also named gender affirming care. (sure I believe the State when all sums on the depopulation agenda always stack on one side). full term and perinatal abortion.

It is literally Darwinism in play. But the forcing of the evolutionary bottle neck is gullibility with State Programs. You believe your DNC vasectomy, abortion, Liberal piece of shit Euthanasia pipeline. Eliminate cheap energy, freeze the citizens on heat* pumps, war on God, force homelessness with immigration without housing, full government paid meth, crack, heroine on prescription, you tax dollars killing citizens and weapons injected, while spending into inflation, and causing stagflation. etc.

Sure you have scepticism and are able to raise sceptic kids. Maybe you get grand kids. But the war on population has been going a long time.

The evolutionary bottle neck is whether or not you trust your government. (and that includes the last conspiracy theory- the war on God while they worship the culling religion that sees us as cattle and permits that culling- satanism)

This abstract lists Propaganda along with other means to achieve depopulation goals.

J Home Econ. 1984 Spring;76(1):8-12.

“Family planning in developing nations: a global concern, our concern

L Harriman

• PMID: 12339668

Abstract

PIP: Rapid population growth is a serious problem in many developing countries and family planning policies developed in response to the problem raise many ethical issues; home economists can help the citizens in their respective countries increase their knowledge of population dynamics and help them assess the ethical implications of population and family planning policies. Most developing countries have high population growth rates.

The annual population growth rates for 1975-79 were 2.8% for Africa, 2.6% for Latin America, and 2.1% for Asia.

Population grows exponentially: a population growing at an annual rate of 3% increases. 1900% in a century. If current population trends continue the world's population will stablize toward the end of the 21st century at about 10 billion persons, compared to the world's present population of 4.3 billion.

Rapid population growth not only threatens the future welfare of society as a whole, but currently impedes the economic development of the world's poorest nations. Consequently, the governments in many developing countries have adopted vigorous family planning programs.

It is difficult to reduce population growth in developing countries because these countries have a high proportion of young people in their populations, i.e., a high number of persons of reproductive age.

Barriers to family planning acceptance include 1) high illiteracy rates 2) high infant mortality rates 3) the high economic and socialvalue placed on children in developing countries and 4)religious beliefs.

Methods used by governments to alter population growth include

1) manipulating access to contraceptives,

2)developing programs to alter social determinants of fertility,

3) using propaganda to encourage or discourage birth control and repressing information contrary to the government's policies,

4) offering incentives to those who further government policies and imposing disincentives on those who do not comply with government policies, and

5) exerting political pressure to force individual to comply with the govermnent's policies.

The use of some of these methods raises ethical issues. When does pressure become coercion? Is coecion justified by the need to ensure the future welfare of the world? In India, sterilization was promoted by making payments to sterilization acceptors and promoters and to physicians who performed sterilizations.

In Taiwan, savings deposits were made for children of couples with 1 or 2 children, and the deposits were decreased in additional children were born.

In China incentives, disincentives, and political and peer pressure are used to promote the governments family planning policies.

Do these strong measures lead to infaticide and to the abuse of children whose births result in economic loss for other family members? Do they violate human rights? These issues should be discussed in home economics classes, and additional efforts must be made to ensure that male students are also provided with population information. Home economists can promote the critical assessment of the population problem and its solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12339668/

Fyi I have a gMAIL subscription to my own substack that censors my substack emails. You can’t make this shit up.

TAKE DOWN THE BEAST