Decisions in infamy
Vaccine minute
A Canadian decision proving courts are enforcing the social and economic APARTHEID of a medical system.
They make themselves the handlers of a peddled product.
They also prove totalitarianism has its foot in the door. And will wink and nod for it.
Do as we tell you or you will not be an equal citizen. Unless you take the Jab your employer forces on you the social safety net won't apply to you. To all others including new comers. But not you. Beware immigrants, once here there are requirements courts enforce like lackeys for the Gavi goons.
When the course has been righted there will be decisions that rest in infamy.
According to Epoch Times
“Federal Court of Appeal has upheld a decision that denied EI benefits to an Ontario man who lost his job because he did not take the COVID-19 vaccine for religious reasons.
Robin Francis, who was working at a health care centre in Ontario, lost his job in Oct. 2021 because he refused the vaccine. When he applied for Employment Insurance, he was denied benefits, which the court said in a Nov. 2 decision was in line with the Employment Insurance Act, deeming Mr. Francis’s behaviour as “misconduct.”
“The applicant was dismissed by his employer on the ground that he refused to comply with the employer’s mandatory policy to obtain a COVID-19 vaccination,” justices Judith Woods, John Laskin, and Siobhan Monaghan wrote. “The applicant had requested an exemption from the policy based on creed but the employer denied this request.”
“We are satisfied that the applicant’s rights to procedural fairness were not violated,” they said.
Mr. Francis’s lawyer, James Manson, said the decision is concerning. He told The Epoch Times they may take the case to the Supreme Court.
"[This case] was important because it's talking about the intersection between people's rights and employment insurance,” he said”
When justice isn't in the courts, where do citizens find it?
In the streets and on the march.
Stock (Pfizer) prices are louder than the halls of justice. Let their products rot.
Court Dismisses Appeal for Employee Denied EI Benefits After Refusing COVID Vaccine.
It's communism. The party will have their enforcers. One day they will make special appointments. Just for you.
But the people are rising aren't they. AREN'T WE.
Disgusting. GET MAD. The tea leaves show me that works.
It occurs to me, that Canada has long favored the take over by the UN, W.H.O., and WEF. Our politicans and judicial system do not consider the people they work for. They work for the central banks, big corporations and ngos.
I am happy that more people are speaking.
Howard Zinn, the American historian, likely meant that even enormous and seemingly strong systems, like authoritarian regimes or oppressive governments, can fall apart or break down relatively quickly. He wasn't explicitly calling out certain regimes such as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union, but he was making a broader point about how these kinds of systems can be surprisingly fragile. What Zinn was getting at is that throughout history, various oppressive systems and authoritarian governments have eventually faced resistance, internal disagreements, or pressure from external sources that led to their collapse. These systems might seem stable and powerful, but they can unravel or crumble when challenged by mass movements, public outcry, international pressure, economic issues, or changes in popular opinion. In simpler terms, Zinn's perspective emphasizes that political and social systems are dynamic. It suggests that even the most deeply rooted powers can be susceptible to change and collapse under the right circumstances. - Luc