Canada amended the criminal code to include JAIL 2-5 Years for not accepting Minor's new TRANS Gender, and for conversations trying to reduce a minors sexual behaviours (with Adults?)

Why will minors ALWAYS BE AFFIRMED. Because otherwise if you attempt to ‘convert’ the minor to cis-gender to align with the gender at birth you will go to jail. Consider that stats say it is a large porprotion of who might be gay adults who are often subjected to gender hormones and surgeries as minors. Are we then actually converting them to heterosexual through gender surgery. Would surgeries be worse than talk therapy. is there a circular problem with the Criminal Code provisions?

Do most Canadians understand that once their minor child decides to identify as another gender, professionals cannot without great personal sacrifice question the minor’s identification. So then all teachers, medical professionals, therapists, must affirm on pain of PRISON. I am sure their unions, lawyers, board lawyers all use this and explain this to them.

what is conversion therapy.

for this let’s ignore changing gay and bi individuals to heterosexuals. That was probably the aspect that most allowed this to pass.

What I find though is that no one questions things so long is they are hot potato politically correct items.

Although there are papers submitted to the Senate that a large portion of those who formerly questioned their gender go through puberty end up living life as a gay individual comfortable in their body. If they are affirmed they may instead go through surgical procedures that involve removing the penis, breasts and a number of other medical interventions. Are we setting up a system to be punitive to gays. since this was pointed out at the Senate with medical reports, it turned out not to be persuasive. But how about you. How do you feel about that, either from the left, from the rainbow, from the right. I am a live and let live person. But I have a masters in law that specialized in Conflict of Interests. Did we set up a system that has a one way on boarding with no off ramp?

You must think about this and decide for yourself.

any service, practice or treatment designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual, gender identity to one that matches the sex assigned at birth, or to repress or reduce non heterosexual sexual attraction or sexual behaviours.

It is conversion: any service, practice or treatment (anything in the medical field,

Would it include a church service. The technocrats use words in a clever fashion. I would say consider this carefully.

It is conversion to change a person’s gender identity to one that matches the sex assigned at birth.

Will any professional want to go to jail. or will they affirm the child regardless of any opinion to the contrary.

Well that set’s up a system that will have affirmation or jail for every professional the child meets. If the child is not certain, would the certainty of all these professionals have an effect. Pronouns are easily adopted by a headstrong child interested in the concepts being floated. After that it is a referral to a system that requires following the child through to the new gender. Is that actualization? when sterilization is a possibility is this criminal code provision setting up gross negligence for the consequences of those sterilizations. There is data out there in terms of Lupron, and osteoporosis. (law suits and data abound in this space).

Testerone on wombs, voice boxes, hair loss. Can anyone explain what the child might endure.

how about complications, pain in surgeries.

I remember peer pressure being a thing when I was growing up and certainly observed it. Is that no longer a thing. or it is a thing and that is part of this system.

Can the child truly understand the consequences of the new gender decision and weigh the medical procedures.

Would conversations about the negative consequences (are there NONE???) of surgeries and hormone medicalization be perceived as failing to affirm or perceived as a practice or conversation that might change the mind of the child.

So would providing informed consent or down sides to the procedures walk EVERY PROFESSIONAL STRAIGHT into conversations that attempt to convert the child to their birth gender. AND THEREFORE JAIL.

So parents cannot have ‘conversations’ that also try to change their birth gender and are unlikely to find a therapist that would evaluate from a first principled basis what is going on, are there any externalities, depression, trauma (sexual assault is a leading reason de-transitioners gave for wanting to be male- imagine).

trusting the professionals who have access to your children without understanding the system they are now in and must abide by is, myopic.

If you work in the system and refer children to professionals, did you know the professionals cannot have any expressed opinion or conversation with the child that suggests their birth gender should be considered before moving headlong into sterilization.

If these ideas are at school and teachers are bound by the same set up (which they are), are schools ‘safe’ for children to have attached genatalia or reproductive organs? what about conversations about decreased future sexual pleasure or difficulties finding a mate, or consequences of sterilization. Can these be discussed. It is pronouns, celebrations and moving the child through or Jail.

PEDOPHILIA ALERT

the other thing I wanted to point out is you cannot have conversations etc to attempt to reduce non-heterosexual sexual attraction OR SEXUAL behaviours. this OR MEANS ANY SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR THE CHILD IS HAVING YOU CANNOT HAVE A CONVERSATION TO TRY TO REDUCE IT. THERE IS NOTHING THAT LIMITS THAT. Sex with dogs, their teachers etc…

people don’t read with a critical mind. we see the gay lgbtq angle and are tought immediately to be an ally. THE CONSERVATIVES VOTED FOR THIS. you see things are put through for their very good reasons, and the heart breaking children etc. So who debates the fine print.

SO STERILIZE MINORS IN A SYSTEM THAT YOU CANNOT OFF BOARD THEM AND IT ALWAYS RESULTS IN THE RIGHT ANSWER. YOU COULDN,T STERILIZE PEDOPHILES AND THAT IS AFTER a proper arrest, charge, legal representation, case with constitutional protections, jury, judge, sentence appeal and beyond a reasonable doubt. but we ARE TAKING GIRLS BREASTS AT 14 IN CANADA, and removing penii. what is the plural of penis without even the ability to provide informed consent or question. IS THAT NORMAL. is it? even if you are in the rainbow, do you think it is protective of the child to have a system that will JAIL everyone in the medical profession that interacts with the child that would question the castration. A pedophile in the criminal system has his genitals more protected than a child in a Canadian School. It would be cruel and unusual punishment for the pedo to be castrated. But the child, it is love. Have we lost our way a bit. Waiting until the child reaches adulhood often resolves the gender disphoria, many have set out. how will we know if that is the case.

is it throwing the baby out with the bath water to toss out sexual pleasure etc and open up the child to pain and possible surgical complications.

Conversion or conversations are something consenting adults can have. So this bill is about minors.

ADULT MINOR SEX

so non-heterosexual attraction, OR sexual behaviours: what that means is if the child was having sex (a sexual behaviour) with an ADULT you couldn’t have a conversation etc to try to reduce that. HMMM. I am a first principled thinker. it says what it says and it prevents conversations to try to reduce sexual behavious LANDS YOU IN JAIL

I think it would get really dangerous for pedophiles. If having a conversation with one’s child about their pedophile abuser, lands you in jail, and killing the pedophile also lands you in jail, this bill will incentivize some to make a choice.

Would conversations reporting the pedophile to the police land you in jail. THIS BILL HAS MANY PROBLEMS. BUT IT PASSED AND IS LAW.

There is no carve out for sexual behaviours with adults. So essentially a man can be having sex with your minor child and conversations to try to reduce it ends up in jail. ABSURD interpretation or did everyone just miss that. You see how words are used? Frame it as a concept most people think they understand.

But how it works. Completely different.

CHURCH SERVICE

and the word ‘SERVICE’ well if the church is doing a sermon, is it walking into jail time? so many questions just from that little bit of the BILL.

But it still passed and it at any point can become operational. Do you get the sense it would be take people to jail time once CBDC and Digital Id in play.

the following is from the Canadian Parliament. I hope you look at the ages and consider the questions you should be asking when you are reading based on my above critique. This post is not for minor children to read and should not be shared with them.

Was David Lametti the same guy who emailed other Liberals about using tanks on the Canadian Trucker protestors. I do think it is one in the same. Well this is his bill. Wonder if tanks against dissent for covid mandates is a proper communication, just how he would interpret the questions I have.

Here are Lametti’s exchanges with Mendicino about using tanks against the Freedom protestors.

““You need to get the police to move,” Lametti told Mendicino on Feb. 2. “And the CAF [Canadian military] if necessary.”

“How many tanks are you asking for?” Mendicino replied.

“I reckon one will do!!” Lametti responded.

On Wednesday, Lametti testified the exchange was “meant to be a joke between two friends.” He also clarified that the government cannot instruct police in operational matters.

Two days later, on Feb. 4, Lametti and Mendicino again voiced their irritation in a text exchange. “Police have all the legal authority they need to enforce the law,” Mendicino wrote. “They just need to exercise it, and do their job.””

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/24/canada-cabinet-freedom-convoy-00070816

So how will USE THE-TANKS-ONE-WILL-D0-LAMETTI interpret whether doctors and teachers will go to jail for not affirming a child.

“1.1  Summary of Bill C-6

Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy),1 was introduced in the House of Commons on 1 October 2020 by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, the Honourable David Lametti. The same bill was previously introduced as Bill C-8 during the first session of the 43^rd Parliament,2 but it died on the Order Paper when Parliament was prorogued on 18 August 2020.

Bill C-6 was studied by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, which reported the bill back to the House with amendments.3 The amended bill was passed by the House of Commons on 22 June 2021 and received first reading in the Senate on the same date. The bill died on the Order Paper when Parliament was dissolved on 15 August 2021.

The definition of “conversion therapy” included in the bill, as paraphrased by the Department of Justice, is

any service, practice or treatment designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual, gender identity to one that matches the sex assigned at birth, or to repress or reduce non heterosexual sexual attraction or sexual behaviours.4

The preamble of Bill C-6 states that conversion therapy causes harm to persons who are subjected to it, particularly children. It harms society more broadly by promoting myths and stereotypes about sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, such as the notion that these personal characteristics can and should be changed. Consequently, the bill aims to discourage and denounce conversion therapy by criminalizing certain activities related to it, with the further intention of protecting “the human dignity and equality of all Canadians.” It amends the Criminal Code (the Code)5 in order to, among other things, prohibit anyone from

• promoting or advertising services related to conversion therapy;

• forcing persons or causing a child to undergo conversion therapy;

• removing a child from Canada to undergo conversion therapy abroad; and

• receiving a material benefit from the provision of conversion therapy.

LL WILL CHURCHES OR OTHER RELIGIOUS INSTITUIONS BE SEEN AS RECEIVING MATERIAL BENEFIT FOR JUST HAVING SERVICES.

The bill does not criminalize the provision of conversion therapy to a consenting adult if no money or other material benefit is received for providing such therapy. Furthermore, it does not make it a criminal offence for a consenting adult to seek or receive conversion therapy.

Bill C-6 also adds provisions to authorize courts to make certain orders related to the promotion of conversion therapy, such as requiring the removal of advertisements for conversion therapy services from computer systems and the Internet.

1.2  Conversion Therapy

1.2.1  Defining Conversion Therapy

Various definitions of conversion therapy exist, both in Canada and globally, and they have evolved over time. According to the Canadian Psychological Association, conversion therapy refers to “any formal therapeutic attempt to change the sexual orientation of bisexual, gay and lesbian individuals to heterosexual.”6 Sexual orientation is a term used to describe an individual’s pattern of emotional, romantic or sexual attraction.7 It may include attraction to the same sex (homosexuality), a different sex (heterosexuality), to both the male and female sexes (bisexuality), or to neither sex (asexuality).8 Sexual orientation is distinct from an individual’s gender identity, which will be discussed below. The American Psychological Association uses the term “sexual orientation change efforts” (SOCE) to describe methods that aim to change a person’s same-sex sexual orientation to an other-sex sexual orientation.9 These methods can include behavioural techniques, psychoanalytic techniques, medical approaches, and religious and spiritual approaches. SOCE has been conducted by both mental health professionals and lay individuals, with the latter including religious professionals, religious leaders, social groups and other lay networks, such as self-help groups.10

The term SOCE has also been expanded to include gender identity change efforts (SOGICE), which refer to methods that aim to change the gender identity or gender expression of an individual.11 Gender identity refers to an individual’s deeply felt internal and individual experience of gender, which may be male or female or lie outside the male/female binary.12 An individual’s gender identity may differ from the sex they were assigned at birth, which refers to the characterization of an individual’s sex based on their primary physiological and biological sexual characteristics at birth.13 Meanwhile, gender expression refers to the ways individuals express their gender identity.14 Gender identity and gender expression change efforts involve similar approaches to those aimed at changing an individual’s sexual orientation. However, the goal of these efforts is for individuals to become cisgender, meaning that their gender identity aligns with the biological sex assigned to them at birth.15

1.2.2  Historical Origins of Conversion Therapy

Conversion therapy was first developed in the 19^th century. At the time, same-sex sexual activity between consenting adults was considered a crime punishable by imprisonment in Canada.16 Within the mental health profession, homosexuality was predominantly viewed as a pathology or mental illness.17 Psychiatrists viewed homosexuality as having its origins in delayed maturity or in pathology such as genetic defects, hormone exposure in the womb, parental abuse or molestation.18 Consequently, they began offering treatments to correct or repair homosexuality as a pathology. Such treatments focused on addressing family dynamics, aversion techniques (electric shock treatments and induced nausea and vomiting), behavioural interventions (dating skills, assertiveness and affection towards the other sex) and cognitive interventions (reframing of thoughts and desires).19

However, research conducted in the 1950s and 1960s examining human sexual behaviour found homosexuality to be a normal variation of human sexual behaviour.20 In the 1960s, there were also significant shifts in societal views regarding homosexuality, which resulted in the Parliament of Canada passing legislation that decriminalized private same-sex sexual acts between two people over the age of 21.21 In the United States, in response to both scientific and broader societal changes and advances in the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer and two-spirit plus (LGBTQ2+) individuals, the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association also undertook reviews of the scientific literature in the early 1970s. The reviews concluded that homosexuality could not be considered a psychological disorder, and it was removed from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1973.22 In 1990, the World Health Organization removed homosexuality from the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases.23 Thus, in the years that followed, conversion therapy was gradually removed from mainstream mental health practice.24 However, some mental health professionals continued to provide a form of conversion therapy, referred to as “reparative therapy,” and founded the National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality.25

Beginning in the 1970s, some faith-based organizations created “ex-gay groups,” which offered individuals engaging in sexual behaviours with or having feelings of attraction towards individuals of the same sex the opportunity to obtain spiritual healing through a process of repentance and forgiveness.26 Those faith-based organizations, referred to as “ex-gay ministries,” drew on psychoanalytic conversion theories and practices that were now rejected by the mainstream mental health community, as well as traditional religious practices such as prayer and scripture reading.27 Those services were generally targeted at individuals belonging to conservative Protestant communities who were seeking to reconcile their same-sex attractions and behaviours with their religious beliefs.28

It is important to note that the approach of faith-based organizations that were part of the “ex-gay movement” differs from the pastoral counselling currently provided by many Christian and other religious denominations, which aims to provide support to LGBTQ2+ individuals but not to change their sexual orientation or gender identity.29

1.2.3  Scientific Evidence Regarding Conversion Therapy

Controversies surrounding the provision of conversion therapy resulted in the American Psychological Association undertaking a systematic review of the scientific evidence regarding its effectiveness and possible harms in 2009.30 Having considered peer reviewed research literature from 1960 to 2006, it found that individuals did not experience long-lasting change in their sexual orientation after being exposed to SOCE, and any changes that occurred were uncommon or rare.31 Outside a laboratory setting, most participants did not stop engaging in sexual behaviours with, or having feelings of attraction toward, individuals of the same sex, and exposure to SOCE did not increase their sexual behaviour with, or their feelings of attraction toward, individuals of the other sex. Studies examining the impacts of aversion techniques used in conversion therapy found that participants experienced significant harms, including loss of sexual feeling, depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety, impotence and relationship dysfunction.32

According to the American Psychological Association review, more recent studies examining the efficacy of non-aversion techniques and religious approaches to changing a person’s sexual orientation were not scientifically rigorous.33 Rather, those studies were based on self-reporting of perceived benefits, harms and changes to sexual orientation or identity. Some of them documented harms that individuals were reported to have experienced as a result of their exposure to SOCE, which included negative social and emotional consequences, deteriorated relationships with family, loss of social support, loss of faith, sexual dysfunction, suicidal ideation and self hatred.34 Those studies were countered by several other studies, conducted by Dr. Joseph Nicolosi and others, that included self-reports from other individuals who said they had experienced benefits from exposure to SOCE. The benefits cited included relief, happiness, an improved relationship with God and perceived improvements in mental health status.35 However, it is noteworthy that the subjects in those studies were predominantly men who indicated that religion was of central importance in their lives.36

As a result of the limited scientific evidence supporting its efficacy and the significant risk of harms that it may pose to individuals, many health professional organizations, including the Canadian Psychological Association, the Canadian Psychiatric Association,37 the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association and other health professional bodies, have denounced conversion therapy.38 According to the Canadian Psychological Association, scientific research does not support the efficacy of conversion therapy.39 Furthermore, conversion therapy “can result in negative outcomes such as distress, anxiety, depression, negative self image, a feeling of personal failure, difficulty sustaining relationships, and sexual dysfunction.”40 The Canadian Paediatric Society has particularly recommended against providing conversion therapy to minors on the grounds that it reinforces the anxiety and guilt that adolescents experience in coming to terms with their sexual orientation or gender identity, leading to poor mental health outcomes.41 Internationally, 12 United Nations entities issued a joint statement in 2015 calling on states to end violence towards LGBTQ2+ individuals. According to the statement, such violence includes “abuse in medical settings, including unethical and harmful so-called ‘therapies’ to change sexual orientation.”42

1.2.4  Current Prevalence of Exposure to Conversion Therapy in Canada

Recent data suggests that exposure to some form of conversion therapy in Canada remains a significant but under-reported issue. According to the 2011–2012 Sex Now Survey, approximately 3.5% of the 8,388 sexual minority43 men surveyed had been exposed to conversion therapy in Canada.44 The study found that for 78.3% of those who had been exposed, the exposure had occurred more than 12 months prior to the study, but also that 7.9% had been exposed in the previous 12 months, suggesting that conversion therapy remains an ongoing practice in the country. The survey also found that exposure to conversion therapy was associated with significant harms, including loneliness, regular illicit drug use, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. It is important to note that this data is limited because it does not include the experiences of sexual minority women in Canada.45

1.2.5  The Canadian Legal Context

1.2.5.1  Division of Powers and Provincial Laws

In introducing Bill C-6, the federal government is relying on Parliament’s authority to pass criminal laws, as per section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867.46 The Supreme Court of Canada has determined that to be within the authority of Parliament’s powers relating to criminal law, a law must be a prohibition with a penal sanction and be directed towards a public purpose (such as peace, security, health or morality).47 Furthermore, as health care is largely a provincial responsibility, criminal laws related to the protection of health must address a “legitimate public health evil.”48

Some provincial legislatures and municipalities have already responded to the harms posed by conversion therapy by prohibiting or restricting it, or certain activities associated with it, in accordance with their jurisdiction. While those measures may restrict or discourage the provision of conversion therapy, they do not criminalize the practice, as this would fall under federal jurisdiction.

Under their powers over “property and civil rights in the province” in section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867, provinces may regulate health care professionals and the provision of health insurance.49 To date, Ontario,50 Nova Scotia51 and Prince Edward Island52 have enacted legislation prohibiting regulated health professionals from providing treatment or services that aim to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of a person under 18 or 19 years of age, depending on the jurisdiction.53 Those laws also prohibit conversion therapy from being considered an insured health service under the provinces’ respective public health care plans.54

Nova Scotia’s Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act prohibits a “person in a position of trust or authority towards a young person” from providing conversion therapy (referred to as “change effort” in the law).55 However, it allows conversion therapy to be provided to mature minors aged 16 and older, provided they consent to treatment.56

Ontario’s legislation does not prohibit conversion therapy for adults or for individuals under 18 years of age who have the capacity to consent to treatment and who consent to it. LL SEE WE ARE AT ALL TIMES TALKING ABOUT MINORS AND THEN DOWNGRADING TO THEM THE CONVERSATIONS THAT WOULD DISSUADE THEM FROM GENDER TRANSITION. AKA RETURNING TO CIS GENDER AS THEY SAY57 In both Ontario and Nova Scotia, parents, guardians, and other substitute decision-makers may not give consent for conversion therapy on another person’s behalf. LL AKA THEY CANNOT DENY IT EITHER58 In Prince Edward Island, the legislation prohibits a substitute decision-maker from consenting to conversion therapy on behalf of an incapable patient.59 Similar bills were introduced in 2020 in the legislatures of Quebec and Yukon.60

While the legislation in Ontario, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island varies in terms of the definitions and terms used for conversion therapy, each province’s legislation specifies in its own language that conversion therapy does not include the following:

1. services that provide acceptance, support or understanding of a person or the facilitation of a person’s coping, social support or identity exploration or development; and

2. sex-reassignment surgery or any services related to sex-reassignment surgery.61

While Manitoba has not passed legislation, it has adopted a policy that “conversion therapy can have no place in the province’s public health care system.”62 In other provinces and territories where there is currently no legislation in place, some municipalities (whose powers are delegated to them by the province) have introduced bylaws prohibiting businesses from offering, advertising or receiving remuneration for providing conversion therapy. For example, Vancouver, British Columbia, has passed By-law No. 12147, A By-law to Amend Business Prohibition By-law No. 5156 Regarding Conversion therapy, which prohibits businesses in the city from “[c]harging a fee for any services that seek to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of any person.”63 Other municipalities have enacted broader bylaws. For example, Edmonton’s Bylaw 19061 prohibits businesses from providing conversion therapy, regardless of whether they receive remuneration from providing such therapy.64 That bylaw also defines businesses broadly to include associations of persons, as well as for-profit and not-for-profit organizations.65

1.2.5.2  Previous Federal Bills

Bill S-260, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), was introduced in the Senate by Senator Serge Joyal and passed first reading on 9 April 2019.66 Bill S-260 died on the Order Paper with the dissolution of the 42^nd Parliament on 11 September 2019 and the calling of the 2019 general election.

Bill S-260 would have amended the Code to “protect” Canadians, particularly young people, from “the damage caused by practices and treatments designed to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.”67 The bill would have added new section 172.01(2) to the Code to make advertising conversion therapy a hybrid offence. In addition, new section 172.01(3) of the Code would have made it a hybrid offence to receive a financial or other material benefit either directly or indirectly from providing conversion therapy to a person under 18 years of age. A person found guilty of either of those hybrid offences could have been liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years on indictment or, on summary conviction, for a period of up to two years less a day.

2  Description and Analysis

2.1  Preamble

As noted in section 1.1 of this Legislative Summary, the preamble of Bill C-6 sets out its premise and purpose.68 The preamble states that conversion therapy is harmful to those who are subjected to it, particularly children. It adds that the practice has broader social harms, including how it is

based on and propagates myths and stereotypes about sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, including the myth that a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression ought to be changed.

The bill aims to address these harms and to “discourage and denounce the provision of conversion therapy in order to protect the human dignity and equality of all Canadians.” In the clauses that follow the preamble, the bill seeks to achieve its purpose by criminalizing certain aspects of the provision of conversion therapy.

2.2  New Offences (Clause 5)

Clause 5 of Bill C-6 adds five new sections to the Code that prohibit core practices and activities related to the provision of conversion therapy. The new offences established by those sections are

forcing a person to undergo conversion therapy (new section 320.102);

causing a child to undergo conversion therapy (new section 320.103);

advertising conversion therapy (new section 320.104); and

receiving a financial or material benefit from the provision of conversion therapy (new section 320.105).

The new sections are placed at the end of Part VIII of the Code, which addresses “Offences Against the Person and Reputation.” Other offences in this part include criminal negligence, homicide, kidnapping and trafficking in persons, and hate propaganda.

The first new section of the Code introduced by Bill C-6 is section 320.101, which defines “conversion therapy” as including any practice, treatment or service that is “designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual, to change a person’s gender identity or gender expression to cisgender or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour or non-cisgender gender expression.” This provision adds, “for greater certainty,” that practices, treatments or services that relate “to the exploration and development of an integrated personal identity without favouring any particular sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression” are not included in the definition.69 New section 320.101 also introduces the term “cisgender” to Canadian law, though it is not defined in the bill. As discussed in section 1.2.1 of this Legislative Summary, the term refers to an individual whose gender identity aligns with the biological sex assigned to that individual at birth.70

New section 320.102 of the Code makes it an offence to knowingly cause a person to undergo conversion therapy without the person’s consent.71 Individuals convicted under this section may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to two years less a day72 on summary conviction or for up to five years on indictment.

New section 320.102 of the Code does not define the role consent might play as a defence to charges under this provision. Rather, it simply states that the offence is committed when a person knowingly causes another person to undergo conversion therapy without that person’s consent. Were charges to be brought under this section, the prosecutor would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged victim had undergone conversion therapy as provided by the accused, and that the victim had not freely consented to it.

Various other provisions in the Code require that there be an absence of consent in order for the offence to have been committed, with some sections adding more detailed criteria concerning what constitutes consent.73 This is in keeping with common law principles that no assault is committed when a victim freely consents, having understood the nature of the act performed.74 In other words, if an accused person can show that the alleged victim consented, then this may be put forward as a defence to certain charges. Jurisprudence has provided additional guidance on how to determine whether valid consent was given.75

New section 320.103 of the Code makes it an offence to cause a person who is under the age of 18 years to undergo conversion therapy. In other words, under this Act, a child cannot consent to receiving conversion therapy, nor can a parent or guardian consent on their behalf. The section explicitly states that unless the accused “took reasonable steps to ascertain the person’s age,” mistaking that child’s age for 18 or older is not a defence for this crime. Persons convicted under this section may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to two years less a day on summary conviction or for up to five years on indictment.

New section 320.104 of the Code makes it an offence to knowingly promote or advertise to provide conversion therapy. Persons convicted under this section may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to two years less a day on summary conviction or for up to two years on indictment.

New section 320.105 of the Code makes it an offence to receive a financial or other material benefit76 in the knowledge that the benefit is being obtained, directly or indirectly, through the provision of conversion therapy. Persons convicted under this section may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to two years less a day on summary conviction or for up to two years on indictment.

New sections 320.104 and 320.105 mostly use the same language as the offences included in sections 286.2 and 286.4 of the Code, which respectively prohibit the provision of sexual services for material benefit and the advertising of sexual services.77 Those provisions form part of Canada’s approach to prostitution: certain activities are criminalized to deter and denounce the practice, but other elements are not prohibited in order to achieve other goals, such as the protection of sex workers.

As explained in section 1.1 of this Legislative Summary, the new offences do not criminalize the provision of conversion therapy to a consenting adult when there is no exchange of money or other material benefit. Furthermore, the receipt of conversion therapy services is not criminalized, whether for adults or minors. Minister Lametti and the Department of Justice have commented on the type of conduct that is and is not intended to be criminalized by the bill. The Department of Justice indicates that

[t]hese new offences would not criminalise private conversations in which personal views on sexual orientation, sexual feelings or gender identity are expressed such as where teachers, school counsellors, pastoral counsellors, faith leaders, doctors, mental health professionals, friends or family members provide support to persons struggling with their sexual orientation, sexual feelings, or gender identity.78

These points were repeated by the Minister when he commented in a press conference that “supportive” persons “need not fear engaging in conversations about someone’s identity – discussions that are often critical to personal development.”79

2.3  Seizure of Advertisements for Conversion Therapy (Clauses 1 and 2)

Bill C-6 introduces several provisions pertaining to warrants and to the seizure, disposal or deletion of materials related to the advertising of conversion therapy. These are added to Part V of the Code, which is titled “Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct,” under the subheading “Offences Tending to Corrupt Morals.”

Section 164(1) of the Code currently permits a judge to issue a warrant authorizing the seizure of copies of a recording, a publication, a representation or any written material if the judge is satisfied there are reasonable grounds to believe that such material is a voyeuristic recording, an intimate image, obscene, child pornography or an advertisement of sexual services.80

The remaining subsections of section 164 pertain to procedures that permit the forfeiture to the Crown of any materials that are seized as a result of any warrant. The occupier of a premises where the materials were seized, or the owner or maker of the materials, is provided an opportunity to oppose this forfeiture. If the court is not satisfied that the materials meet the criteria in section 164(1), it may order that they be returned to the person from whom they were seized.

Bill C-6 adds advertisements for conversion therapy to the types of materials for which a warrant may be issued and that may be seized under section 164.

Certain terms used in relation to the materials referenced in section 164(1) of the Code are listed and defined in section 164(8). Clause 1 of Bill C-6 adds the following definition of an advertisement for conversion therapy:

advertisement for conversion therapy means any material – including a photographic, film, video, audio or other recording, made by any means, a visual representation or any written material – that is used to advertise an offer to provide conversion therapy contrary to section 320.104.

Clause 2 of the bill adds advertisements for conversion therapy to section 164.1 of the Code, which provides for warrants of seizure and other procedures when the same types of prohibited materials referenced in section 164 are stored on and made available through a computer system that is within the jurisdiction of the court.

Section 164.1(1) of the Code permits a judge to make an order when there are reasonable grounds to believe that prohibited materials are stored on and made available through a computer system. This order may be for the custodian of the system to give an electronic copy to the court, ensure that the material is no longer stored on the computer system or made available from it, or provide information that helps find the person who posted the material. Additional subsections allow for the deletion of the material, for the person who posted the material to oppose the deletion, for the proceedings to be held in the absence of that person and for the return of the material if it is not determined to be prohibited.

2.4  Removal of a Child from Canada (Clause 4)

Section 273.3 of the Code prohibits anyone from taking a person under the age of 16 or 18 (depending on the offence) outside the country to commit acts that would constitute one of several listed offences, most of which are sexual offences. This is a hybrid offence that may be prosecuted by way of indictment, with a maximum term of imprisonment of five years, or by summary conviction, with a maximum term of imprisonment of up to two years less a day.

Clause 4 of Bill C-6 adds new section 320.103 to the list of offences in section 273.3(1)(c) of the Code,81 making it an offence to take a person who is both ordinarily resident in Canada and under the age of 18 outside Canada with the intention of causing them to undergo conversion therapy.

2.5  Electronic Surveillance (Clause 3)

Part VI of the Code includes provisions to permit designated peace officers and agents to obtain judicial authorization to conduct electronic surveillance for the purpose of criminal investigations into offences listed in section 183 of the Code (e.g., facilitating terrorist activity, weapons trafficking, child pornography, child abductions, drug trafficking and organized crime offences). Bill C-6 amends section 183 of the Code by adding three offences to the existing list:

• section 273.3 – removal of child from Canada;

• new section 320.102 – forced conversion therapy; and

• new section 320.103 – causing child to undergo conversion therapy.

Notes

1. Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), 43^rd Parliament, 2^nd Session. [ Return to text ]

2. Bill C-8, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), 43^rd Parliament, 1^st Session. [ Return to text ]

3. House of Commons, Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights (JUST), Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), Fifth report, 11 December 2020. [ Return to text ]

4. Government of Canada, Proposed changes to Canada’s Criminal Code relating to conversion therapy. [ Return to text ]

5. Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 (the Code). [ Return to text ]

6. Canadian Psychological Association, CPA Policy Statement on Conversion/Reparative Therapy for Sexual Orientation 

1.  (98 KB, 2 pages), 2015. [ Return to text ]

2. Clare Annett, “Gender Equality Week: Understanding Gender and Sexual Diversity Terminology,” HillNotes, Library of Parliament, 24 September 2018. [ Return to text ]

3. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

4. American Psychological Association (APA), Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation 

1.  (1.12 MB, 140 pages), 2009, p. 12. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

3. Travis Salway et al., Protecting Canadian sexual and gender minorities from harmful sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts 

1.  (201 KB, 12 pages), Brief submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, 2019. [ Return to text ]

2. For further details, see Clare Annett, “Gender Equality Week: Understanding Gender and Sexual Diversity Terminology,” HillNotes, Library of Parliament, 24 September 2018. [ Return to text ]

3. Translation Bureau, Gender and sexual diversity glossary. [ Return to text ]

4. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

5. Travis Salway et al., “Prevalence of Exposure to Sexual Orientation Change Efforts and Associated Sociodemographic Characteristics and Psychosocial Health Outcomes among Canadian Sexual Minority Men,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 65, No. 7, 26 January 2020. [ Return to text ]

6. Government of Canada, Rights of LGBTI persons. [ Return to text ]

7. APA, Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation 

1.  (1.12 MB, 140 pages), 2009, pp. 22–24. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

3. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

4. Jack Drescher et al., “The Growing Regulation of Conversion Therapy,” Journal of Medical Regulation, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2016, pp. 7–12. [ Return to text ]

5. For further details, see, for example, Government of Canada, Rights of LGBTI persons; Julia Nicol, Legislative Summary of Bill C-32: An Act related to the repeal of section 159 of the Criminal Code, Publication no. 42-1-C32-E, Library of Parliament, 11 January 2017; and Chloé Forget, Legislative Summary of Bill C-66: An Act to establish a procedure for expunging certain historically unjust convictions and to make related amendments to other Acts, Publication no. 42-1-C66-E, Library of Parliament, 28 September 2018. [ Return to text ]

6. Jack Drescher et al., “The Growing Regulation of Conversion Therapy,” Journal of Medical Regulation, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2016, pp. 7–12. [ Return to text ]

7. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

8. APA, Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation 

1.  (1.12 MB, 140 pages), 2009, p. 24. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid., p. 25. [ Return to text ]

3. Ibid., pp. 22–24; and Timothy W. Jones et al., Preventing Harm, Promoting Justice: Responding to LGBT conversion therapy in Australia 

1.  (5.94 MB, 83 pages), 2018, p. 13. [ Return to text ]

2. Jack Drescher et al., “The Growing Regulation of Conversion Therapy,” Journal of Medical Regulation, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2016, pp. 7–12; and Timothy W. Jones et al., Preventing Harm, Promoting Justice: Responding to LGBT conversion therapy in Australia 

1.  (5.94 MB, 83 pages), 2018, p. 13. [ Return to text ]

2. Timothy W. Jones et al., Preventing Harm, Promoting Justice: Responding to LGBT conversion therapy in Australia 

1.  (5.94 MB, 83 pages), 2018, p. 13. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

3. APA, Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation 

1.  (1.12 MB, 140 pages), 2009, p. 24. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid., pp. 2–3. [ Return to text ]

3. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

4. Ibid., p. 34. [ Return to text ]

5. Ibid., p. 42. [ Return to text ]

6. Ibid., p. 49. [ Return to text ]

7. Ibid., p. 45. [ Return to text ]

8. Albina Veltman and Gary Chaimowitz, “Mental Health Care for People Who Identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and (or) Queer,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 59, No. 11, November 2014, pp. 1–7. [ Return to text ]

9. Some other health professional organizations, such as the Canadian Medical Association, have not yet released a policy statement on conversion therapy. See Travis Salway et al., Protecting Canadian sexual and gender minorities from harmful sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts 

1.  (201 KB, 12 pages), Brief submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, 2019. [ Return to text ]

2. Canadian Psychological Association, CPA Policy Statement on Conversion/Reparative Therapy for Sexual Orientation 

1.  (98 KB, 2 pages), 2015. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

3. M. Kaufman, Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee, “Adolescent sexual orientation,” Paediatrics & Child Health, Vol. 13, No. 7, September 2008, pp. 619–623. [ Return to text ]

4. United Nations, Ending violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people 

1.  (277 KB, 2 pages), Joint statement, September 2015. [ Return to text ]

2. The term “sexual minority” refers to individuals who identify as having a different sexual orientation from the general population. See House of Commons, Standing Committee on Health, The Health of LGBTQIA2 Communities in Canada 

1.  (2.89 MB, 70 pages), Twenty-eighth report, June 2019, p. 10. [ Return to text ]

2. Travis Salway et al., “Prevalence of Exposure to Sexual Orientation Change Efforts and Associated Sociodemographic Characteristics and Psychosocial Health Outcomes among Canadian Sexual Minority Men,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 65, No. 7, 26 January 2020. [ Return to text ]

3. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

4. Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3 (U.K.). [ Return to text ]

5. Reference re Validity of Section 5 (a) Dairy Industry Act, [1949] S.C.R. 1 (also known as the Margarine Reference). [ Return to text ]

6. RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199, para. 32 (CanLII). [ Return to text ]

7. Peter Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada, 5^th ed., Vol. 1, p. 32-2. [ Return to text ]

8. Ontario, Affirming Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Act, 2015, S.O. 2015, c. 18 – Bill 77. [ Return to text ]

9. Nova Scotia, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act, S.N.S. 2018, c. 28. [ Return to text ]

10. Prince Edward Island, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection in Health Care Act 

1.  (906 KB, 8 pages), 2019, c. 33. [ Return to text ]

2. In Ontario and Prince Edward Island, the age is 18, whereas in Nova Scotia the age is 19. See Ontario, Affirming Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Act, 2015, S.O. 2015, c. 18 – Bill 77, s. 2; Prince Edward Island, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection in Health Care Act 

1.  (906 KB, 8 pages), 2019, c. 33, s. 4; and Nova Scotia, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act, S.N.S. 2018, c. 28, s. 6(1). [ Return to text ]

2. Ontario, Affirming Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Act, 2015, S.O. 2015, c. 18 – Bill 77, s. 1 (which amended section 11.2 of the Health Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.6); Nova Scotia, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act, S.N.S. 2018, c. 28, s. 4; and Prince Edward Island, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection in Health Care Act 

1.  (906 KB, 8 pages), 2019, c. 33, ss. 2–3. [ Return to text ]

2. Nova Scotia, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act, S.N.S. 2018, c. 28, s. 7(1). [ Return to text ]

3. Ibid., s. 6(2). [ Return to text ]

4. Ontario, Affirming Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Act, 2015, S.O. 2015, c. 18 – Bill 77, s. 29.1(3). [ Return to text ]

5. Ibid., s. 29.1(4); and Nova Scotia, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act, S.N.S. 2018, c. 28, s. 6(3). [ Return to text ]

6. Prince Edward Island, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection in Health Care Act 

1.  (906 KB, 8 pages), 2019, c. 33, s. 5(2). [ Return to text ]

2. Quebec, Bill 599, An Act to respect sexual orientation and gender identity, 42^nd Legislature, 1^st Session; and Yukon, Bill No. 9, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act 

1.  (124 KB, 5 pages), 34^th Legislative Assembly, 3^rd Session. [ Return to text ]

2. Ontario, Affirming Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Act, 2015, S.O. 2015, c. 18 – Bill 77, s. 1. See also the nearly identical provisions in Nova Scotia, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection Act, S.N.S. 2018, c. 28, ss. 8(a) and 8(b); and Prince Edward Island, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protection in Health Care Act 

1.  (906 KB, 8 pages), 2019, c. 33, s. 2(b.1)(ii). [ Return to text ]

2. Manitoba, Health and Seniors Care, Position on Conversion Therapy. [ Return to text ]

3. City of Vancouver, British Columbia, By-law No. 12147, A By-law to Amend Business Prohibition By law No. 5156 Regarding Conversion therapy 

1.  (13 KB, 1 page), 19 June 2018, amending Business Prohibition By law No. 5156 

1.  (41 KB, 7 pages), Schedule A, s. 15. [ Return to text ]

2. City of Edmonton, Alberta, The City of Edmonton Bylaw 19061, Prohibited Businesses Bylaw 

1.  (1.18 MB, 4 pages), Schedule A. [ Return to text ]

2. Ibid., s. 2(2)(a). [ Return to text ]

3. Bill S-260, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), 42^nd Parliament, 1^st Session. [ Return to text ]

4. Ibid. [ Return to text ]

5. Section 13 of the Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21, states that preambles are to be read as part of an enactment that is intended to assist in explaining its “purport and object.” [ Return to text ]

6. In the first reading version of the bill, clause 5 did not refer to “gender expression” and the “for greater certainty” provision added that the definition

does not include a practice, treatment or service that relates

(a) to a person’s gender transition; or
(b) to a person’s exploration of their identity or to its development.

1. Amendments made by JUST added, among other things, reference to gender expression and modified the “for greater certainty” provision. See JUST, Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), Fifth report, 11 December 2020.

   [ Return to text ]

2. Translation Bureau, Gender and sexual diversity glossary. [ Return to text ]

3. In the first reading version of the bill, clause 5 included the phrase: “against that person’s will.” This phrasing was amended by JUST to use the phrasing “without the person’s consent.” See JUST, Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), Fifth report, 11 December 2020.

   The marginal note heading for new section 320.102 of the Code is entitled “Forced conversion therapy.” Section 14 of the Interpretation Act states that marginal notes form no part of the enactment but are inserted for convenience of reference only.

   [ Return to text ]

4. As per section 787 of the Code. [ Return to text ]

5. Examples include the provisions pertaining to assault, including sexual assault. See sections 153.1, 265, and 271 to 273.1 of the Code. [ Return to text ]

6. Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, “Criminal Law – Defences,” Canadian Encyclopedic Digest. [ Return to text ]

7. For instance, there are many Supreme Court of Canada decisions pertaining to consent in sexual assault cases: R. v. Seaboyer; R. v. Gayme, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. Esau, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 777; R. v. Ewanchuk, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330; R. v. Mills, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668; R. v. Darrach, 2000 SCC 46; R. v. Shearing, 2002 SCC 58; and R. v. J.A., 2011 SCC 28. [ Return to text ]

8. In other words, this could be money in a form of currency or some other thing of value to the recipient that motivates the recipient to perform a particular action. [ Return to text ]

9. Lyne Casavant and Dominique Valiquet, Legislative Summary of Bill C-36: An Act to amend the Criminal Code in response to the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Attorney General of Canada v. Bedford and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, Publication no. 41-2-C36-E, Library of Parliament, 18 July 2014. [ Return to text ]

10. Government of Canada, Proposed changes to Canada’s Criminal Code relating to conversion therapy. [ Return to text ]

11. CPAC (Cable Public Affairs Channel), “Ministers discuss bill to ban conversion therapy,” YouTube, 9 March 2020, 10:35 [Bilingual]. [ Return to text ]

12. For all these types of materials, related prohibitions are set out elsewhere in the Code (sections 162, 162.1, 163, 163.1 and 286.4), and further definitions are provided in section 164(8). [ Return to text ]

13. Other offences included in section 273.3(1)(c) are those found in sections 155, 160(2), 170, 171, 267, 268, 269, 271, 272 and 273 of the Code. [ Return to text ]”

So have these criminal code provisions set up some problems or fixed everything perfect for fixing the kids into their new Genders.

Those who advocate on behalf of Transgender children, do they understand these laws. I hope so.

It will come a time that we will all be silent if we are not loud now.