Image from ModernDiplomacy.eu
A comrade must have written this.
Note the following:
regional governments are desired precursors to the OWG (one world government) think EU;
Brics is the next step up from Regional governments;
Regional governments are for replicating the model until OWG is achieved;
the polarization of American politics is the ‘reason’ why democracy can’t be the OWG format (so who thinks polarization isn’t actually a Xi Jinping’s goal)
WEF mentioned;
Xi wants to try global citizens in courts outside their countries; NO THANKS
Covid sure did help! or rather helped a lot;
Equity is going to be outsourced as the OWG ruling format- wait already happened through CRT and DIE(FREEDOM);
they use Environmental groups and Womens Groups to create Communist Parties since 2019 in all western countries; (oh goody!);
This is the Big Guy’s little project; AND HE IS QUOTED. OWG UNDER HIM.
So I need to ask whether Hamas was working not for Iran but for China in order to destabilize the region and create a new front. The only manner to engulf the world in Martial Law is to have declarations of war fly everywhere. So while it is pitched as a Religious conflict or terrorism or local borders, I think both countries are being sacrificed by Xi for the new conflict he requires to complete the plan.
Just like I thought the globalists were carving up Ukraine with Putin, (and Zelinski will fight for Ukraine down to the last Ukrainian) I think the Middle East is being re-engineered for Xi’s vision. WW3 is necessary.
SO MASSIVE SUFFERING in order to create a OWG. think on that those who are pit against one another. who is the puppeteer. who wants a OWG and will use War to create it.
I have believed that the Religious would have to be eliminated in order for a Xi version of communism to be marched out across the world. Look at the genocide of Uyghurs in China. Christianity in the west and around the world is facing assaults, with the leaders of the west turning a blind eye. All religions are being told to back seat against LGBTQIA etc. Now we have the next two Abrahamic religions in escalating conflict. If you need to take power from those who have it in the West, going after Jews was going to be part of Xi’s plan from the outset.
That I see Xi’s world domination plan, it also creates a back drop and lens through which to see other conflicts. Not that existing conflicts don’t exist in regions but that these can be exploited for a purpose. the Hamas attack was so particularly inflaming and brutal. Beheading babies, mass rape, murders.. And now 1.1 million people are expected to move in 1 day to save their lives, while Gaza is being strip bombed. Gas on the conflict?
(PRAY ALL OF US FOR PEACE. I love you dear readers, we are witnessing such sadness and destruction. )
By winning WW3 or WWL XI will expect that he can impose on the West the last of the OWG. Take the reparations from the West as the coup de grace.
So there’s the plan that allows a globalist take over while also denting the world population and having the necessary controls: War in Europe via Ukraine and Russia, War in the Middle East via Israel and Palestine and culminating in War in Asia through Taiwan or North Korea and South Korea - as early as next week;
Martial law and repressions in the west;
possible conscription in the West;
if the West is at war with China: what do Canadians think of all the Chinese Police stations? do you like your alarm systems being on the internet instead of hard wired? what do you think of attacks on the 2nd amendment or open borders; or gun confiscation from legal gun owners;
the settlement of the war imposes that lovely equity, we are already rolling out as DIE (FREEDOM);
I have thought the OWG nodded to Xi for a long time. (WEF spends 1 meeting a year there the WHO is run by Tedros, who is Xi’s appointment and new shit-storm powers are being introduced through the WHO. all the destabilizing and demoralization of DIE (Freedom) and CRT work seamlessly with Xi’s China, all the smart city infrastructure being exported, and CBDC replicates China; religion as impossible to co-exist with the new ‘instruction’. and the radicalization of the youth, and unions -comrades). These independent observations have led me there. He may still be a front man for the 7. That is still possible. But please just assume that this vision outlaid in the article influences every single world event you watch.
Well here’s the good comrade herself writing of the OWG under Xi Jingpings hopeful governance.
“The visit of Egyptian President “El-Sisi”, Saudi Crown Prince “Bin Salman”, Sheikh “Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan”, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, and Prince of Qatar Sheikh “Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani”, to attend the Winter Olympics in China, hosted by the Chinese capital “Beijing” from February 4-20, as a significance cooperative initiative to provide the international support that China needs at the present time in confronting the “politicization of the Winter Olympics in Beijing”, China raised the slogan “Together for a Common Future”, with its “clear political and international significance”, and for promoting the idea of (pluralism in international affairs, and pressing for the establishment of a new, unified world government), under the Chinese leadership and vision of President Comrade “Xi Jinping”, who was awared to mention this point in all of his political discourses internally and externally, focusing on the “common destiny of humanity ”.
As an Egyptian academic, specializing in Chinese political affairs, I can lay out general features of the form and nature of this “new one world government”, and how Egypt can be during the era of President “El-Sisi” and Arab and African leaders, and even all those developing, marginalized and poor countries, are the “ideal countries” to China, the thought and vision of the comrades in the Communist Party of China, and the focus of the speeches of the Chinese President, Comrade “Xi Jinping”. As the following:
The establishment of a “one world government” is a prelude to (the imposition of a single global legal order), meaning that:
“Allowing any citizen of the world to be tried in independent international courts, not a requirement within the borders of his nation-state”
The refusal of President “El-Sisi”, the Saudi Crown Prince “Mohammed bin Salman”, the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, the UAE Crown Prince of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh “Mohammed bin Zayed” and the Qatari Prince, Sheikh “Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani” to the policies of the American and Western politicization of the file hosting China for the “Winter Olympics”, comes as an affirmation of the importance of this global pattern of transition to the (new world government), and perhaps with a common thought and vision between China and the countries of the region in the face of the “deliberate politicization of all Arab and Chinese issues”.
The content of the unified global discourse at the present time is, based on:
The world post “Covid-19” has crossed the so-called closed borders points and unilateral solutions, as we have already become in the heart of globalization or post-globalization, or according to my previous pproposition of “adapting to the results of globalization”, such as: adapting to the necessity of using advanced technology, Artificial intelligence, smart robots…, etc. Thus, we agree with China in our need for global regulations to enhance economic and global stability, as well as global peace and security.
Perhaps the organization or grouping and entity of the “European Union”, despite all of those many challenges it is going through, is based on its value as a cornerstone in the (nature and form of the initial appropriate for that one global government regionally), given the nature of the broader value of the global vision and leadership of the nature of the European Union through his management of the many foreign files, especially in the (diplomacy and smart pluralism), and others. Now more than ever, it has become a lesson that cannot be ignored.
Here, this global government is supposed to be preceded by what is known as: a pattern of a (continental or regional governments), such as: the European Union, the Caribbean Union, and others, and to encourage the repetition of this model in other regions of the world. Therefore, ideas are put forward about the establishment of (the Union of Latin American States, the Union of Arab States, the Union of Pacific States), and others. This is because (the reorganization of the world into regions and federations is considered a first step towards establishing a world order and imposing a one world government). According to my belief, the proposal of the Chinese President, Comrade “Xi Jinping”, on (the common destiny of humanity), is the ideal premise and the best slogan for the nature of the next stage.
The formation of this new one world government under Chinese leadership and vision will serve the interests of the developing Arab and African countries, and may be a prelude to the Arab and African countries for obtaining a (permanent representation in the UN Security Council). Here, China, as an essential partner of the Arab countries and the African Union, in The framework of the “China-Arab and China-Africa Cooperation Forum” may help meet the need of these countries to have their voice heard globally, by following fair and equitable rules globally.
Also, as an academic, I do not imagine at all that the demand of a large bloc such as the African Union at the present time, is only “to deliver its voice to the world”. It is something that has stopped me analytically during my follow-up to the session of the meeting of the representatives of the African Union countries on Saturday, February 5, 2022, through the request of the African countries in the African Union to meet their desire to collectively contribute to (establishing a continental media center to counter the negative media portrayal of Africa).
In my opinion, (activating the global government pattern will make the blocs important, such as the Union of Arab States or what is known as the League of Arab States, and the same case for the African Union), and others. All of them are still remaining almost small, and ineffective partners, without a real contribution or meaningful role in the international governance system.
But the pattern of transition to the form of the world government in the Chinese concept or proposal, will work to “reshape and organize the world order, according to the rules of equity and justice collectively”, which will meet the request of Arab countries within the framework of the League of Arab States and African countries within the framework of the African Union, to meet their desire to (obtaining at least two permanent seats and five non-permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council).
Egypt and all Arab and developing countries have become similar to the Chinese proposal, especially after the “Covid-19” pandemic, about (the interdependence of the fate of mankind and the welfare of peoples first, and the development of a policy for the required minimum wage), both during the era of President “El-Sisi” and all Arab countries. The developing and African countries, so the political discourse of all Arab leaders, through their participation in the Beijing Winter Olympics and their support for China, is focused on:
“Turning inward in today’s world is not a viable option, we are simply so interconnected that the problems, challenges, and opportunities we face do not recognize state borders. Efforts to return to the times of independent nation-states will have a heavy price”
The United Nations took an actual advanced step towards “building a one world government” in 2015, with “the decline in the importance of the sovereignty of the nation state, and the closing of the borders of states to themselves” at the present time in favor of other issues that affect all of humanity, especially issues and topics, such as: “Development Global issues, climate change and control of epidemics and viruses, such as the Corona pandemic “Covid-19”, and others. This reinforced the international support for the issuance of a document, entitled: (Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development). This document now includes practical suggestions for “91 issues” under five headings, which are: (Globe, Prosperity, Peace, Sustainable Development Goals), which all aim to improve the standard and quality of life on the planet Earth.
We find that the anthropologist, the anthropologist, the thinker Professor “Thomas H. Ericsson”, he may have referred, perhaps indirectly, in his well-known book, entitled: “Ethnicity and Nationalism” to the term “non-racial”, in order to express (a post-globalization human being), whose acquired global features overcome or outperform his original national and ethnic features, as he emphasized during the pages of his interesting book, that:
“One of the characteristics of the contemporary world is that people appear more similar and more different at the same time due to the forces of modernity and globalization”
According to Professor “Thomas H. Ericsson”, this means that people of different geographic, ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds can communicate more effectively today than ever before.
The Egyptian researcher goes to analyze and apply Arab and African support to China in the face of American and Western attacks, through the participation of President “El-Sisi” and Saudi Crown Prince “Bin Salman” and Sheikh “Mohammed bin Zayed” Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, in the opening of the “Winter Olympics” in China, and that (as a gesture to provide the international support that China needs at the present time to promote the idea of pluralism in international affairs), as President “El-Sisi” and the other Arab leaders who have visited China, are trying to provide (an international mobilization that China needs from developing countries to affirm everyone’s adherence to the principles of protecting states, national sovereignty and preventing interference in state affairs, protecting pluralism and the interests of developing countries, and supporting justice and equity in the world).
Defending the idea of “multipolarity” is the governing framework of the Chinese leadership at the present time. For example, the first foreign international visit was made by Chinese President “Xi Jinping”, in 2017, abroad, in which he visited the United Nations office in Geneva, to deliver a speech. In his speech at the “World Economic Forum” in Davos, Chinese President “Xi Jinping” stressed the importance of (multilateralism in managing world affairs, and China’s interest in effective participation in global governance).
Everyone must understand that we are currently witnessing a “clash of nations and peoples over interests, not a clash of civilizations or a clash of religions”, as promoted by a number of Western orientalists and foreign thinkers.
With the importance of emphasizing that “American democracy cannot be applied to peoples by force”, with my introduction to a possibility theory of emerging democracies in the Arab countries, similar to the American concept of democracy, but coupled with the increasing of “intensity of violence and political terrorism in the region, in the face of American policies”.
My personal observation as an expert in Chinese political affairs, lies in (the success of the content of communist political discourses globally, according to the Chinese concept of working on the welfare of peoples and achieving a well-off life for all), and even the success of the content of those discourses in democratic countries and in the Arab world in favor of China, in contrast to the decline of American democracy discourses globally and regionally.
For example, we will find that (the idea of a minimum wage, not an American democracy, is the most important for peoples now, whether in Egypt, Saudi Arabia or the Arab Gulf in general, and the beginning of its spread in Europe itself). The leftist populist, and at the present time, the leaders of the Arab political systems are defending the poor of societies by undertaking development initiatives to serve them, especially the issues of the “required minimum wages”.
The number of members of “left-wing and communist parties” in Europe has increased since 2019, particularly due to the rise of women’s movements and climate advocacy organizations. The members of these radical left parties also succeeded in winning seats in European local and legislative councils in return for (the decline in the intensity and strength of liberal democratic parties in the American concept of democracy).
According to my analysis, the concepts of American liberalism and democracy have retreated globally in favor of other issues that are more important and closer to (China’s ideas and reforms internally to mobilize and mobilize the masses in its interest), such as:
(Strengthening old-age insurance and granting minor orphans, family subsidies, obtaining three weeks of annual vacation, women’s right to vote and suffrage)
The initiatives presented by the workers’ and people’s parties to the Europeans themselves became a “catalyst” for all the different political forces, even those who disagree with them. Consequently, the success of the idea of (the minimum wage has become more important than the discourses of American democracy), and the European labor and popular parties succeeded in promoting it, and at the present time, the European left and communist parties are defending the poor in society, health and social security, improving services, and others. All of them are ideas that are in the interest of the people more than the ideas of American democracy and its aspirations to achieve its own narrow interests at the expense of the weak and marginalized peoples, regions and developing countries.
The celebration of the (100th Anniversary of Chinese Communism in July 2021) was close to the preoccupations of members of European workers’ and people’s parties. This is despite the right-wing counter-campaign on the effects left by the Maoist movements in Europe, in relation to the ideas of “Mao Zedong”.
According to my analysis of the current global scene and the idea of polarizing American political systems, governments, alliances and polarizations, this will be an application and confirmation of the theory of “the impartial failure of all countries in the region in the face of the American or Chinese forces”, in confronting China and the United States of America (either with or against) without the (possibility of maneuvering between its parties in the coming period), which is the most important.
Here, we find that China attaches great importance to the interests of marginalized and developing Arab and African peoples, the most prominent of which are the (Chinese development contributions in favor of Egypt and African countries to build a center for reconstruction and development). With the keenness of the leaders and comrades of the ruling Communist Party in China to expand the scope of Chinese contributions to development and peace for the benefit of the peoples in Egypt, the Arab countries and the weak and marginalized countries of the African continent, especially due to the importance of the Egyptian role for China as a large Arab, African and Islamic developing regional state, as well as its geographical advantages. Therefore, the Chinese keenness on (promoting free trade to enhance trade opportunities and investments for the benefit of China through the Egyptian gateway to the African continent) came to serve the interests of developing, marginalized, poor and African peoples in the first place.
Also, for example, the inauguration of (Le Pen’s Chinese workshop as a platform for strengthening dialogue between Egyptian and Chinese youth) in November 2020, all of which have become important measures to consolidate and strengthen relations between the Chinese and Egyptian sides, build more competencies, and a platform for exchanging experiences between Chinese and Egyptian youth.
The organization of virtual discussions between Egyptian and Chinese officials on (means of activating economic development and advancing cooperation in the fields of health, information technology and space) came to reach consensus among all those parties. As well as, the Chinese support to Egypt to build (an information technology center).
The symbolic and even strategic importance of the participation of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Emirates, and Qatar in the “Beijing Winter Olympics”, as they are two of the great regional countries, and between them there is close coordination and cooperation in international and regional affairs in order to protect the common interests of developing countries, protect regional and global peace and stability, and strive to establish (a new, justice and reasonable global political and economic order). There is positive cooperation between them in international and regional forums, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Emirates and Qatar have an important role for China in playing a greater role in international and regional affairs.
The Sino-Egyptian-Saudi-Emirati cooperation within the framework of (the China-Arab Forum, and the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation with regard to Egypt’s membership in it), comes as an important part of the strategic cooperation between the two countries, as well as (the holding of the fourth session of the Ministerial Conference of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Egypt), which is what It will provide a new opportunity for the development of Chinese-Egyptian-Saudi Western relations. Here, we will find that China has the desire to cooperate in various forms with the countries of the region, Egypt and Saudi Arabia within the framework of the China-Arab Cooperation Forum, in order to work all within the framework of (consolidating the idea of international multipolarity and collective participation in international decision-making).
Here, I may refer to a completely different and old proposition, but I found it extremely dangerous and important to put it back and consider it again, which is the field of (linking between different scientific disciplines, such as medicine, sports with politics), and others. It was one of the strangest and deepest phrases that stuck in the mind of the Egyptian researcher for many years, the phrase of the Britain well-known medicine “Patrick Manson”, the founder of tropical medicine, and even the owner of the first huge reference in this specialty, is his famous phrase: “I believe the white race should colonize the world”
Professor Patrick Manson’s famous phrase was a tool that brought him real fame, given its racist and racial bias, which means the idea of the end of the world and its closure on itself, and the racial bias of the West at the expense of African and poor marginalized peoples. This phrase is a (completely opposite to what I propose today in terms of presenting a new idea, and then discussing the mechanism of its collective application in the Arab and African countries, and it is related to the idea of “establishing the world government,” with a Chinese open-minded vision, compared to any other ideas that are biased to a particular thought or ideology), such as: democracy, liberalism and neoliberalism, and some other such concepts that carry within some “ethnic or divisive ideological bias”, that is, it seeks to divide the world into two kinds of regimes, which are: “democratic regimes and other authoritarian, totalitarian, or a non-democratic regimes”.
Where we found that according to this new American division of the relationship between the political systems in the world ideologically, which was held by the “Conference of Leaders of Democratic Countries” in December 2021, which actually led to the marginalization and division of the world into two blocs, and all the countries of the Arab region and China went to the bloc of non-democratic countries, with the exception of Iraq, which basically lacks “the elements of true democracy according to the testimony of the Iraqis themselves”. However, the American call for Iraq came as “an American tool for promoting its democracy in the region, given its occupation of Iraq since its entry in 2003, and basically causing chaos in it”.
The Egyptian researcher found that there is a severe global shortage, according to the previous proposal referred to Dr.Patrick Manson, especially after the spread of the Corona pandemic or “Covid-19”, in all American, Western, Chinese and international references and writings, for what is known as: “imperialist medicine or Political medicine”, or even media medicine, social, continental and others related to the common political and military aspects analytically, and it is the one that links politics and medicine in the first place, with the exception of the only international book that the Egyptian researcher found, and it fits into my previous idea of Professor “David Arnold” in his book, regarding: “Imperialist Medicine and Local Societies”, which summarized his presentation and practical and applied conclusion in this interesting book, arriving at important recommendations and conclusions, which I can summarize, in:
“All treatment orders and health battles regarding epidemics, viruses, the increase in diseases and medical intervention during the colonial policy era, were subject to the military operation and the pattern of military intervention in the first place, which allowed the armies and these military medicines working with them, to cross the borders, and take advantage of periods of epidemics and viruses and the increase and spread of certain types of diseases to suppress movements of rejection and opposition”
Accordingly, and as a specialist in political science, specifically in the field and path of “comparative political systems”, there is what is scientifically, academically and professionally, known as: “the theory of entanglement or networking among all the different scientific disciplines”. This type of imperialist medicine, means:
“The existence of medicines in a military capacity are present in poor or marginalized areas under the occupation or tutelage of their countries”
As is the case during the period of the Britain colonization of Africa and others, where (the view of prejudice or racial superiority) by the category of “military medicines compared to civilian medicines”, may have drawn attention again to return to that point in order to develop a new networking mechanism between (the form of the relationship between political systems and military human medicine, from the category of “military medicines” in colonial, marginal or custodian areas, mainly during the Britain colonial era). The Egyptian researcher discovered, that there is paramount importance internationally to do studies on (the relationship between politics and medicine science), such as: making extensive academic research studies, on:
(The relationship between the Coronavirus pandemic and the fading of the sovereignty of nation states” or “the relationship between epidemics and viruses and the growth of imperialism”, i.e. intervention, domination and military control mainly over the population and citizens of those affected areas), and others
Here, it was one of (the most important features of medical intervention in the colonial countries is its connection with the military aspects), not only because many of the medicines and managers of these medical policies were primarily military, or that the only working organs that participated in the medicine of tropical areas were military.
Accordingly, my new analytical and interpretive proposal and vision has become the current search for (the best types of “governance systems” suitable for all political systems, especially our developing and marginalized Arab and African countries, especially after the ideological American division of the world into democratic and authoritarian non-democratic ones). Which stopped me greatly, to research and study again in all previous writings, about the relationships between medicine and politics, sports and politics, and others. Then trying to apply it to the current situation, especially in light of the sharp global division that we are witnessing today into democratic and non-democratic systems, and so on.
My new analysis internationally remains the theory of forming (continental or regional Arab and African blocs, unifying efforts between them and China in preparation for the establishment of global governance systems and international frameworks that suit the aspirations of our peoples at the present time) given the similarity of goals among all their parties. Also, proposing the theory of (building alliances and networking and working with other different ethnic, religious and political blocs and gatherings in the world), that would provide more political power for our marginalized peoples, and strengthen Arab pressure mechanisms towards issues of American politicization of events, as happened in the “Beijing Winter Olympics”. Considering that any restriction or derogation of the civil rights of Arabs, Muslims, Africans, the Chinese and the other marginalized and poor peoples today, may affect the freedoms of others tomorrow, and so on. Therefore, it has become imperative for everyone to unite for the sake of the rules of fairness and global justice, and to pass decisions in favor of the people, by choosing (a global system of government agreed upon by all as a larger entity or bloc to defend the issues and interests of the peoples).”
What do you think. are we witnessing a global reorganization for CCP? Certainly in terms of repressions of speech, rolling out authoritarianism, rolling out smart cities, CBDC etc. could he also be rolling out manufactured conflicts for his purpose?
damn right he could. Its not even a conspiracy. Its a stated goal being set out methodically.
So as a human being with the Love of God and our World in you, what are you going to do about it? Get out in front of transnational tropes. Speak with Courage and Confidence. Your words and their effects are additive. In every space. Municipal meetings, trustees, corporate, etc. Let’s defeat his systematic goals in our institutions. Let’s defeat his partners in crime in our governments. Let’s do that Now shall we. No time to waste.
Terrifying essay!
- Luc
I agree with much of what you are saying. The western countries are at the brink of economic disaster. Many countries are seeing the rise of censorship on speech and assembly. There appears to be greater poverty and violence in many cities across western countries. There are reports of growing division amongst the people. The ideas of the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the World Economic Forum are becoming entangled in our laws and policies. I also see how Chinese ideas of the people being submissive to the state being more entrenched in western countries.
I am fearful of what I see, yet I have faith that by taking my stand and joining with like-minded people that something can be done.